TSTP Solution File: PUZ034-1.003 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ034-1.003 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 04:02:21 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7666/PUZ/PUZ034-1.003+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 55] [nf = 0] [nu = 47] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 210] [nf = 0] [nu = 174] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 655] [nf = 0] [nu = 487] [ut = 57]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1589] [nf = 0] [nu = 1186] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3382] [nf = 0] [nu = 2591] [ut = 59]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6782] [nf = 0] [nu = 5339] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13235] [nf = 0] [nu = 10668] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25573] [nf = 0] [nu = 21009] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 49390] [nf = 0] [nu = 41170] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 95794] [nf = 0] [nu = 80704] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 186911] [nf = 0] [nu = 158645] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 366893] [nf = 0] [nu = 312980] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 723934] [nf = 0] [nu = 619593] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1434302] [nf = 0] [nu = 1230153] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2850403] [nf = 0] [nu = 2447890] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 5676909] [nf = 0] [nu = 4879147] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 11323014] [nf = 0] [nu = 9736484] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 42 secs [nr = 22606946] [nf = 0] [nu = 19444886] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 84 secs [nr = 45164991] [nf = 0] [nu = 38854179] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65286934] [nf = 10] [nu = 55507718] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65287089] [nf = 10] [nu = 55507845] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65287542] [nf = 14] [nu = 55508158] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65289740] [nf = 24] [nu = 55509175] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65297657] [nf = 140] [nu = 55512235] [ut = 79]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 182 secs [nr = 76733615] [nf = 57510] [nu = 56128329] [ut = 1127]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 97806919
% resolvents: 97711850 factors: 95069
% Number of unit clauses generated: 58885450
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 60.21
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9 [1] = 37 [2] = 1 [3] = 10
% [4] = 15 [5] = 6 [6] = 1049 [7] = 42
% Total = 1169
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 58885450 [2] = 22314622 [3] = 14637991 [4] = 1886085 [5] = 81411 [6] = 1352
% [7] = 8
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] attack_2 (+)0 (-)24
% [1] less_2 (+)9 (-)0
% [2] queens_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [3] same_2 (+)0 (-)18
% [4] diagonal_attack_3 (+)0 (-)1066
% [5] do_queens_3 (+)2 (-)3
% [6] range_3 (+)17 (-)3
% [7] select_3 (+)9 (-)0
% [8] sum_3 (+)10 (-)6
% ------------------
% Total: (+)48 (-)1121
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1169
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 26420962
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 645274
% Number of successful unifications: 97806919
% Number of unification failures: 365874346
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 118
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 231739112
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 90694842
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 11277
% Max entries in substitution set: 60
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 30776769
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 28669345
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 40
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 10
% Number of states in UCFA table: 6311
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 26562
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.24
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 463681265
% ConstructUnitClause() = 30777929
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 46.09 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 326023
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------