TSTP Solution File: PUZ033-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:11:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:38:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.18/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.18/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.18/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.18/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.18/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.61 % File : PUZ033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.18/0.61 % Domain : Puzzles
% 0.18/0.61 % Problem : The Winds and the Windows Puzzle
% 0.18/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.18/0.61 % English : (1) There is always sunshine when the wind is in the East.
% 0.18/0.61 % (2) When it is cold and foggy, my neighbor practices the flute.
% 0.18/0.61 % (3) When my fire smokes, I set the door open.
% 0.18/0.61 % (4) When it is cold and I feel rheumatic, I light my fire.
% 0.18/0.61 % (5) When the wind is in the East and comes in gusts, my fire
% 0.18/0.61 % smokes.
% 0.18/0.61 % (6) When I keep the door open, I am free from headache.
% 0.18/0.61 % (7) Even when the sun is shining and it is not cold, I keep my
% 0.18/0.61 % window shut if it is foggy.
% 0.18/0.61 % (8) When the wind does not come in gusts, and when I have a
% 0.18/0.61 % fire and keep the door shut, I do not feel rheumatic.
% 0.18/0.61 % (9) Sunshine always brings on fog.
% 0.18/0.61 % (10) When my neighbor practices the flute, I shut the door,
% 0.18/0.61 % even if I have no headache.
% 0.18/0.61 % (11) When there is a fog and the wind is in the East, I feel
% 0.18/0.61 % rheumatic.
% 0.18/0.61 % Show that when the wind is in the East, I keep my windows shut.
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 % Refs : [Car86] Carroll (1986), Lewis Carroll's Symbolic Logic
% 0.18/0.61 % Source : [ANL]
% 0.18/0.61 % Names : winds.ver1.in [ANL]
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.18/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 2 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% 0.18/0.61 % Number of literals : 32 ( 0 equ; 20 neg)
% 0.18/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.18/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% 0.18/0.61 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 12 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.18/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.18/0.61 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.18/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 % Comments :
% 0.18/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c1,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ wind_in_east
% 0.18/0.61 | sunshine ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c2,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ cold
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ foggy
% 0.18/0.61 | neighbor_practices_flute ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c3,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ fire_smokes
% 0.18/0.61 | door_is_open ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c4,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ cold
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ i_feel_rheumatic
% 0.18/0.61 | fire_is_lit ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c5,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ wind_in_east
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ wind_in_gusts
% 0.18/0.61 | fire_smokes ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c6,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ door_is_open
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ headache ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c7,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ sunshine
% 0.18/0.61 | cold
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ foggy
% 0.18/0.61 | window_is_shut ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c8,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( wind_in_gusts
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ fire_is_lit
% 0.18/0.61 | door_is_open
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ i_feel_rheumatic ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c9,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ sunshine
% 0.18/0.61 | foggy ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c10,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ neighbor_practices_flute
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ door_is_open ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c11,axiom,
% 0.18/0.61 ( ~ foggy
% 0.18/0.61 | ~ wind_in_east
% 0.18/0.61 | i_feel_rheumatic ) ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(c12,hypothesis,
% 0.18/0.61 wind_in_east ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 cnf(prove_window_is_shut,negated_conjecture,
% 0.18/0.61 ~ window_is_shut ).
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.18/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.61 %ClaNum:13(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.18/0.61 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.18/0.61 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.18/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.18/0.61 %SharedTerms:24
% 0.18/0.61 %goalClause: 2
% 0.18/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.18/0.61 [1]P1(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [2]~P11(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [3]P2(a500)+~P1(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [4]P3(a500)+~P2(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [5]P4(a500)+~P6(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [6]~P8(a500)+~P4(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [7]~P4(a500)+~P9(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [8]P8(a500)+~P5(a500)+~P3(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [9]P6(a500)+~P1(a500)+~P12(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [10]P10(a500)+~P1(a500)+~P3(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [11]P7(a500)+~P5(a500)+~P10(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [12]P5(a500)+P11(a500)+~P2(a500)+~P3(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 [13]P4(a500)+P12(a500)+~P10(a500)+~P7(a500)
% 0.18/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.18/0.61
% 0.18/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (P2(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (~P3(a500)+P10(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,10])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (P3(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,4])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (~P12(a500)+P6(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,9])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (~P3(a500)+P5(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,2,12])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (P8(a500)+~P5(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,8])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (P10(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,15])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (~P10(a500)+P7(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,19,20,6,5,11])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 (~P10(a500)+~P7(a500)),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,19,20,6,5,11,18,13])).
% 0.18/0.62 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.18/0.62 ($false),
% 0.18/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[21,26,28]),
% 0.18/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.18/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------