%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DCTP---1.31
% Problem  : PUZ030-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : oldtptp
% Command  : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec  4 14:19:06 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.00s
% Output   : Assurance 0.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% running dctp on problem file PUZ030-2.oldtptp on host art02.cs.miami.edu
% starting preprocessing loop for 63 clauses
% no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses
% input formula is propositional
% problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23595/PUZ030-2.oldtptp
%   	Syntax :	Number of clauses :	63 ( 36 non-Horn; 0 unit)
%   			Number of literals :	214 ( 0 equality)
%   			Maximal clause size :	10
%   			Number of predicates :	10 ( 10 propositional; 0-0 arity)
%   			Number of functors :	0 ( 0 constant; 0-0 arity)
%   			Number of variables :	0 ( 0 singleton)
%   			Maximal term depth :	0
% Starting proof
% **************** Exit status is success (PROOF found in 0.0 seconds) ****************
% Proof search statistics:
% ========================
% Length initial path:        63
% Linking steps (succ/fail):  111 / 1150
% Twin-clause inferences:     9
% Eager eliminations:         0
% Rewrites (subgoal/path):    0 / 0
% GR-closures total/c-foldup: 232 / 55
% Links generated/deleted:    251 / 228
% Links sweeped vector/all:   0(0) / 0(0)
% Clauses in tableau/pruned:  120 / 36
% Regularity/Tautology fails: 890 / 0 (0)
% Renamings/Contractions:     120 / 0
% Variants deleted/subsumed:  220 / 0
% Clauses by splitting:       0
% Variant subsumption tests:  0
% Fails ful/mat/sig/len:      0 / 0 / 0 / 0
% Pre subsumption tests:      3906
% Subsumed unit/path/back:    64 / 0 / 20
% Coupled eliminations:       1092
% Simplifications/lemmas:     29 / 2 (0)
% Foldups root/context:       3 / 80
% Maximum term depth/compl:   0 / 0
% Relevance vectors:          432
% Unifications/failed:        0 / 0
% Maximum tableau depth:      10
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------