TSTP Solution File: PUZ029-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PUZ029-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:10:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : PUZ029-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:17:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.51 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.56 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.56 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.56 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.56 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.56 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.56
% 0.19/0.56 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.56 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.56 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % File : PUZ029-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.19/0.57 % Domain : Puzzles
% 0.19/0.57 % Problem : The pigs and balloons puzzle
% 0.19/0.57 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.57 % English : 1) All, who neither dance on tight ropes nor eat penny-buns,
% 0.19/0.57 % are old.
% 0.19/0.57 % 2) Pigs, that are liable to giddiness, are treated with respect.
% 0.19/0.57 % 3) A wise balloonist takes an umbrella with him.
% 0.19/0.57 % 4) No one ought to lunch in public who looks ridiculous and eats
% 0.19/0.57 % penny-buns.
% 0.19/0.57 % 5) Young creatures, who go up in balloons, are liable to
% 0.19/0.57 % giddiness.
% 0.19/0.57 % 6) Fat creatures, who look ridiculous, may lunch in public,
% 0.19/0.57 % provided that they do not dance on tight ropes.
% 0.19/0.57 % 7) No wise creatures dance on tight ropes, if liable to
% 0.19/0.57 % giddiness.
% 0.19/0.57 % 8) A pig looks ridiculous, carrying an umbrella.
% 0.19/0.57 % 9) All, who do not dance on tight ropes, and who are treated
% 0.19/0.57 % with respect are fat.
% 0.19/0.57 % Show that no wise young pigs go up in balloons.
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 % Refs : [Car86] Carroll (1986), Lewis Carroll's Symbolic Logic
% 0.19/0.57 % Source : [ANL]
% 0.19/0.57 % Names : pigs.ver1.in [ANL]
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.57 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.19/0.57 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 4 unt; 4 nHn; 13 RR)
% 0.19/0.57 % Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% 0.19/0.57 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.57 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.57 % Number of predicates : 13 ( 13 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.57 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.57 % Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.57 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.57 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(boring_old_people,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( dances_on_tightropes(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | eats_pennybuns(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | old(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(giddy_pigs_reated_with_respect,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ pig(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ liable_to_giddiness(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | treated_with_respect(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(wise_ballonists_have_umbrellas,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ wise(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ balloonist(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | has_umbrella(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(dont_look_ridiculous_eating_buns_in_public,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ looks_ridiculous(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ eats_pennybuns(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ eats_lunch_in_public(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(young_balloonists_get_giddy,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ balloonist(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ young(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | liable_to_giddiness(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(fat_ridiculous_off_tightrope_eat_in_public,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ fat(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ looks_ridiculous(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | dances_on_tightropes(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | eats_lunch_in_public(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(wise_giddy_dont_dance_on_tightrope,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ liable_to_giddiness(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ wise(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ dances_on_tightropes(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(pigs_look_ridiculous_with_umbrellas,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ pig(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ has_umbrella(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | looks_ridiculous(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(non_dancers_who_are_respected_are_fat,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( dances_on_tightropes(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ treated_with_respect(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | fat(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(young_or_old,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( young(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | old(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(not_young_and_old,axiom,
% 0.19/0.57 ( ~ young(X)
% 0.19/0.57 | ~ old(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(piggy_is_wise,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.57 wise(piggy) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(piggy_is_young,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.57 young(piggy) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(piggy_is_a_pig,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.57 pig(piggy) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(prove_piggy_is_no_balloonist,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.57 balloonist(piggy) ).
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.57 %ClaNum:15(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.57 %VarNum:32(SingletonVarNum:11)
% 0.19/0.57 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.19/0.57 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.57 %SharedTerms:5
% 0.19/0.57 %goalClause: 3
% 0.19/0.57 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.19/0.57 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.57 [2]P11(a1)
% 0.19/0.57 [3]P2(a1)
% 0.19/0.57 [4]P13(a1)
% 0.19/0.57 [5]P13(x51)+P3(x51)
% 0.19/0.57 [7]~P13(x71)+~P3(x71)
% 0.19/0.57 [6]P5(x61)+P3(x61)+P4(x61)
% 0.19/0.57 [8]P7(x81)+~P12(x81)+P4(x81)
% 0.19/0.57 [9]~P2(x91)+~P13(x91)+P8(x91)
% 0.19/0.57 [10]~P1(x101)+~P8(x101)+P12(x101)
% 0.19/0.57 [11]~P11(x111)+~P2(x111)+P9(x111)
% 0.19/0.57 [12]~P1(x121)+~P9(x121)+P10(x121)
% 0.19/0.57 [13]~P8(x131)+~P11(x131)+~P4(x131)
% 0.19/0.57 [14]~P10(x141)+~P6(x141)+~P5(x141)
% 0.19/0.57 [15]P6(x151)+~P10(x151)+~P7(x151)+P4(x151)
% 0.19/0.57 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.57
% 0.19/0.57 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.57 (~P3(a1)),
% 0.19/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,4,11,9,7])).
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.19/0.57 (~P4(a1)),
% 0.19/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,4,11,9,7,13])).
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.57 (P10(a1)),
% 0.19/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,2,4,11,9,7,13,12])).
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.57 (P12(a1)),
% 0.19/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,2,4,11,9,7,13,12,10])).
% 0.19/0.57 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.19/0.57 ($false),
% 0.19/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,20,22,24,8,6,15,14]),
% 0.19/0.57 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.57 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------