TSTP Solution File: PUZ029-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : PUZ029-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:59:17 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 31.01s
% Output   : Refutation 31.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19889/PUZ/PUZ029-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 12] [nf = 0] [nu = 3] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 55] [nf = 0] [nu = 15] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 142] [nf = 0] [nu = 36] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 360] [nf = 0] [nu = 102] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 834] [nf = 0] [nu = 240] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1985] [nf = 10] [nu = 596] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4644] [nf = 20] [nu = 1420] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 10816] [nf = 128] [nu = 3351] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 25108] [nf = 236] [nu = 7881] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 57445] [nf = 986] [nu = 18143] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 131260] [nf = 1736] [nu = 41863] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 295226] [nf = 6072] [nu = 94436] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 664354] [nf = 10408] [nu = 214245] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1471476] [nf = 33178] [nu = 475269] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 3264181] [nf = 55948] [nu = 1061900] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 13 secs [nr = 7129943] [nf = 168832] [nu = 2321049] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 29 secs [nr = 15614011] [nf = 281716] [nu = 5115607] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 17363835] [nf = 341745] [nu = 5705224] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 17363879] [nf = 341745] [nu = 5705236] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 17363976] [nf = 341745] [nu = 5705257] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 17364350] [nf = 341747] [nu = 5705371] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: balloonist_1(piggy_0())
% B1: pig_1(piggy_0())
% B2: wise_1(piggy_0())
% B5: ~old_1(x0) | ~young_1(x0)
% B6: ~balloonist_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0) | has_umbrella_1(x0)
% B7: ~balloonist_1(x0) | ~young_1(x0) | liable_to_giddiness_1(x0)
% B8: dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | eats_pennybuns_1(x0) | old_1(x0)
% B9: ~dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0)
% B11: ~has_umbrella_1(x0) | ~pig_1(x0) | looks_ridiculous_1(x0)
% B12: ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~pig_1(x0) | treated_with_respect_1(x0)
% B14: ~fat_1(x0) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(x0) | dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(x0)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > wise_1(piggy_0())
% U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > young_1(piggy_0())
% U5: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > has_umbrella_1(piggy_0())
% U6: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0())
% U7: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0())
% U9: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > ~dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0())
% U10: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0())
% U11: < d4 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0())
% U12: < d4 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > fat_1(piggy_0())
% U13: < d5 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 > eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% wise_1(piggy_0()) ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% young_1(piggy_0()) ....... U3
% Derivation of unit clause U5:
% balloonist_1(piggy_0()) ....... B0
% ~balloonist_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0) | has_umbrella_1(x0) ....... B6
%  ~wise_1(piggy_0()) | has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B6:L0]
%  wise_1(piggy_0()) ....... U2
%   has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U6:
% balloonist_1(piggy_0()) ....... B0
% ~balloonist_1(x0) | ~young_1(x0) | liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) ....... B7
%  ~young_1(piggy_0()) | liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B7:L0]
%  young_1(piggy_0()) ....... U3
%   liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U3:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U7:
% pig_1(piggy_0()) ....... B1
% ~has_umbrella_1(x0) | ~pig_1(x0) | looks_ridiculous_1(x0) ....... B11
%  ~has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) | looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B11:L1]
%  has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) ....... U5
%   looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U9:
% wise_1(piggy_0()) ....... B2
% ~dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0) ....... B9
%  ~dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) | ~liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B2:L0, B9:L2]
%  liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... U6
%   ~dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U6:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U10:
% ~old_1(x0) | ~young_1(x0) ....... B5
% dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | eats_pennybuns_1(x0) | old_1(x0) ....... B8
%  ~young_1(x0) | dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | eats_pennybuns_1(x0) ....... R1 [B5:L0, B8:L2]
%  young_1(piggy_0()) ....... U3
%   dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) | eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U3:L0]
%   ~dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) ....... U9
%    eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U9:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U11:
% pig_1(piggy_0()) ....... B1
% ~has_umbrella_1(x0) | ~pig_1(x0) | looks_ridiculous_1(x0) ....... B11
%  ~has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) | looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B11:L1]
%  ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(x0) | ~eats_pennybuns_1(x0) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(x0) ....... B10
%   ~has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) | ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) | ~eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B10:L2]
%   has_umbrella_1(piggy_0()) ....... U5
%    ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) | ~eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U5:L0]
%    eats_pennybuns_1(piggy_0()) ....... U10
%     ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L1, U10:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U12:
% pig_1(piggy_0()) ....... B1
% ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~pig_1(x0) | treated_with_respect_1(x0) ....... B12
%  ~liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) | treated_with_respect_1(piggy_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B12:L1]
%  ~treated_with_respect_1(x0) | dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | fat_1(x0) ....... B13
%   ~liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) | dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) | fat_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B13:L0]
%   liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... U6
%    dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) | fat_1(piggy_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U6:L0]
%    ~dances_on_tightropes_1(piggy_0()) ....... U9
%     fat_1(piggy_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U9:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U13:
% ~dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0) ....... B9
% ~fat_1(x0) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(x0) | dances_on_tightropes_1(x0) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(x0) ....... B14
%  ~liable_to_giddiness_1(x0) | ~wise_1(x0) | ~fat_1(x0) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(x0) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(x0) ....... R1 [B9:L0, B14:L2]
%  liable_to_giddiness_1(piggy_0()) ....... U6
%   ~wise_1(piggy_0()) | ~fat_1(piggy_0()) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U6:L0]
%   wise_1(piggy_0()) ....... U2
%    ~fat_1(piggy_0()) | ~looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0]
%    fat_1(piggy_0()) ....... U12
%     ~looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) | eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U12:L0]
%     looks_ridiculous_1(piggy_0()) ....... U7
%      eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... R5 [R4:L0, U7:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... U13
% ~eats_lunch_in_public_1(piggy_0()) ....... U11
%  [] ....... R1 [U13:L0, U11:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 17707003
% 	resolvents: 17365252	factors: 341751
% Number of unit clauses generated: 5705618
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 32.22
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		[1] = 1		[2] = 5		[3] = 1		
% [4] = 2		[5] = 1		
% Total = 14
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 5705618	[2] = 8115293	[3] = 3885971	[4] = 105	[5] = 16	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] balloonist_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [1] dances_on_tightropes_1	(+)0	(-)1
% [2] eats_lunch_in_public_1	(+)1	(-)1
% [3] eats_pennybuns_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [4] fat_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [5] has_umbrella_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [6] liable_to_giddiness_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [7] looks_ridiculous_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [8] old_1		(+)0	(-)1
% [9] pig_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [10] treated_with_respect_1	(+)1	(-)0
% [11] wise_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [12] young_1		(+)1	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)11	(-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 14
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 26807294
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 35
% Number of successful unifications: 17707027
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 36752420
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 48969531
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 18
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3090944
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 17
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 14
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.21
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 48
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 17707027
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3090954
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 2.86 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 571194
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 32 secs
% CPU time: 31.01 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------