TSTP Solution File: PUZ028-5 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ028-5 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:58:52 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27281/PUZ/PUZ028-5+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 64] [nf = 2] [nu = 14] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 160] [nf = 52] [nu = 34] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 876] [nf = 102] [nu = 174] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3236] [nf = 1034] [nu = 314] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12526] [nf = 1966] [nu = 814] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44172] [nf = 11676] [nu = 1314] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 130920] [nf = 21386] [nu = 2246] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 408012] [nf = 93878] [nu = 3178] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1027078] [nf = 166370] [nu = 4110] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 2860412] [nf = 605436] [nu = 5042] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6533182] [nf = 1044502] [nu = 5974] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6648393] [nf = 1070036] [nu = 6011] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6648453] [nf = 1070050] [nu = 6031] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6648570] [nf = 1070124] [nu = 6051] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6652428] [nf = 1070200] [nu = 6551] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 6666581] [nf = 1077208] [nu = 7051] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 6936226] [nf = 1084504] [nu = 14103] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 8061627] [nf = 1951670] [nu = 21155] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 187 secs [nr = 34338934] [nf = 2839764] [nu = 81151] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 98835886
% resolvents: 67568574 factors: 31267312
% Number of unit clauses generated: 100599
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.10
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 11 [2] = 10
% Total = 21
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 100599 [2] = 21411428 [3] = 51790196 [4] = 23518192 [5] = 1917579 [6] = 97892
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] person_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [1] after_2 (+)15 (-)0
% [2] familiar_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] not_familiar_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)21 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 21
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 138909057
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 8973678
% Number of successful unifications: 98835886
% Number of unification failures: 970102026
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 37237968
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 13757565
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 21
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 60912
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 9
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 36
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.25
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1068937912
% ConstructUnitClause() = 60922
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.06 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 329453
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------