TSTP Solution File: PUZ028-2 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : PUZ028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:10:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : PUZ028-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat May 28 22:38:26 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b
% 0.14/0.37  # and selection function SelectCQIPrecW.
% 0.14/0.37  #
% 0.14/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.37  # Number of axioms: 39 Number of unprocessed: 39
% 0.14/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.20/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.20/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.20/0.37  # 39 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.20/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.20/0.37  # Found 36 unit axioms.
% 0.20/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.20/0.37  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.20/0.37  # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.20/0.37  # 36 unit axiom clauses
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.20/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.20/0.37  # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.20/0.37  # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.20/0.40  # 20448 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.20/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.20/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.20/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (person(n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (person(n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (person(n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (person(n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (person(n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (person(n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (not_equal(n1,n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (not_equal(n1,n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (not_equal(n1,n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (not_equal(n1,n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (not_equal(n1,n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (not_equal(n2,n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (not_equal(n2,n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (not_equal(n2,n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (not_equal(n2,n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (not_equal(n2,n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (not_equal(n3,n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (not_equal(n3,n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (not_equal(n3,n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (not_equal(n3,n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (not_equal(n3,n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (not_equal(n4,n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (not_equal(n4,n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (not_equal(n4,n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (not_equal(n4,n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (not_equal(n4,n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (not_equal(n5,n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (not_equal(n5,n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (not_equal(n5,n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (not_equal(n5,n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (not_equal(n5,n6))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (not_equal(n6,n1))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (not_equal(n6,n2))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (not_equal(n6,n3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (not_equal(n6,n4))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (not_equal(n6,n5))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (~familiar(X1,X2)|~familiar(X3,X1)|~familiar(X2,X3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (~not_familiar(X1,X2)|~not_familiar(X3,X1)|~not_familiar(X2,X3))).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (not_familiar(X1,X2)|familiar(X1,X2)|~not_equal(X1,X2)|~person(X2)|~person(X1))).
% 0.20/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.20/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.20/0.40  # Found 17 steps
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (~not_familiar(n1,n2)|~not_familiar(n2,n1)|~not_familiar(n2,n2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (~not_familiar(n1,n2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~not_equal(n1,n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (~person(n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (~person(n1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (familiar(n1,n2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_77])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_171, plain, (~familiar(n2,n1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_175, plain, (~not_equal(n2,n1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_176, plain, (~person(n1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_177, plain, (~person(n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_172, plain, (~familiar(n2,n2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_187, plain, (~person(n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_188, plain, (~person(n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~not_familiar(n2,n1)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_76])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_197, plain, (~not_equal(n2,n1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_198, plain, (~person(n1)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.20/0.40  cnf(i_0_199, plain, (~person(n2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.20/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.20/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.20/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.20/0.40  # 20441 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # 20442 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # 20444 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # 20443 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # Child (20448) has found a proof.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  # 20445 Satisfiable branch
% 0.20/0.40  # Proof search is over...
% 0.20/0.40  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------