TSTP Solution File: PUZ028-2 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ028-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:57:56 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 6.87s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27053/PUZ/PUZ028-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 24] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 510] [nf = 38] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2328] [nf = 232] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10518] [nf = 714] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21372] [nf = 2204] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 86298] [nf = 10750] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 151224] [nf = 19296] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 216150] [nf = 27842] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 281076] [nf = 36388] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 346002] [nf = 44934] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 410928] [nf = 53480] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 475854] [nf = 62026] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 540780] [nf = 70572] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 605706] [nf = 79118] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 670632] [nf = 87664] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 735558] [nf = 96210] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 800484] [nf = 104756] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 865410] [nf = 113302] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 930336] [nf = 121848] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 995262] [nf = 130394] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1060188] [nf = 138940] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1125114] [nf = 147486] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1190040] [nf = 156032] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1254966] [nf = 164578] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1319892] [nf = 173124] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1384818] [nf = 181670] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1449744] [nf = 190216] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1514670] [nf = 198762] [nu = 0] [ut = 36]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 1713432
% resolvents: 1514670 factors: 198762
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 36
% Total = 36
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 5208 [3] = 247140 [4] = 951372 [5] = 471540 [6] = 38172
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] person_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [1] familiar_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] not_equal_2 (+)30 (-)0
% [3] not_familiar_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)36 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 36
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 145765
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 102768
% Number of successful unifications: 1713432
% Number of unification failures: 20679720
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 6139536
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 5726868
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 10
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 66
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.15
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 22393152
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 285572
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 7 secs
% CPU time: 6.87 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------