TSTP Solution File: PUZ028-2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : PUZ028-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:54:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 4.50s 2.14s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : PUZ028-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:04:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  Inference rules
% 4.50/2.14  ----------------------
% 4.50/2.14  #Ref     : 0
% 4.50/2.14  #Sup     : 149
% 4.50/2.14  #Fact    : 0
% 4.50/2.14  #Define  : 0
% 4.50/2.14  #Split   : 17
% 4.50/2.14  #Chain   : 0
% 4.50/2.14  #Close   : 0
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  Ordering : KBO
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  Simplification rules
% 4.50/2.14  ----------------------
% 4.50/2.14  #Subsume      : 17
% 4.50/2.14  #Demod        : 262
% 4.50/2.14  #Tautology    : 62
% 4.50/2.14  #SimpNegUnit  : 45
% 4.50/2.14  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.50/2.14  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.50/2.14  
% 4.50/2.14  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.50/2.14  ----------------------
% 4.50/2.14  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 4.50/2.14  Parsing              : 0.25
% 4.50/2.14  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.50/2.14  Main loop            : 0.66
% 4.50/2.14  Inferencing          : 0.25
% 4.50/2.14  Reduction            : 0.19
% 4.50/2.14  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 4.50/2.14  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.50/2.14  Subsumption          : 0.15
% 4.50/2.14  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.50/2.14  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.50/2.14  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.50/2.14  Total                : 1.14
% 4.50/2.14  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.50/2.14  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.50/2.14  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.50/2.14  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------