TSTP Solution File: PUZ027-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:27:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : PUZ027-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat May 28 20:21:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 11 clauses, backtracked 21 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 57 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 75639 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 44 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  15[0:Inp] || a_truth(truthteller(a))* a_truth(truthteller(b)) -> answer(a_and_b_truthteller).
% 0.19/0.41  16[0:Inp] || a_truth(truthteller(a)) a_truth(normal(b))* -> answer(a_truthteller_b_normal).
% 0.19/0.41  17[0:Inp] || a_truth(truthteller(a)) a_truth(liar(b))* -> answer(a_truthteller_b_liar).
% 0.19/0.41  18[0:Inp] || a_truth(normal(a))* a_truth(truthteller(b)) -> answer(a_normal_b_truthteller).
% 0.19/0.41  19[0:Inp] || a_truth(normal(a))* a_truth(normal(b)) -> answer(a_and_b_normal).
% 0.19/0.41  20[0:Inp] || a_truth(normal(a)) a_truth(liar(b))* -> answer(a_normal_b_liar).
% 0.19/0.41  21[0:Inp] || a_truth(liar(a))* a_truth(truthteller(b)) -> answer(a_liar_b_truthteller).
% 0.19/0.41  22[0:Inp] || a_truth(liar(a))* a_truth(normal(b)) -> answer(a_liar_b_normal).
% 0.19/0.41  23[0:Inp] || a_truth(liar(a))* a_truth(liar(b)) -> answer(a_and_b_liar).
% 0.19/0.41  24[0:Inp] answer(u) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  25[0:Inp] ||  -> a_truth(normal(u)) a_truth(liar(u))* a_truth(truthteller(u)).
% 0.19/0.41  33[0:MRR:23.2,24.0] || a_truth(liar(b)) a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  34[0:MRR:22.2,24.0] || a_truth(normal(b)) a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  35[0:MRR:21.2,24.0] || a_truth(truthteller(b)) a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  36[0:MRR:20.2,24.0] || a_truth(liar(b))* a_truth(normal(a)) -> .
% 0.19/0.41  37[0:MRR:19.2,24.0] || a_truth(normal(b)) a_truth(normal(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  38[0:MRR:18.2,24.0] || a_truth(truthteller(b)) a_truth(normal(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  39[0:MRR:17.2,24.0] || a_truth(liar(b))* a_truth(truthteller(a)) -> .
% 0.19/0.41  40[0:MRR:16.2,24.0] || a_truth(normal(b))* a_truth(truthteller(a)) -> .
% 0.19/0.41  41[0:MRR:15.2,24.0] || a_truth(truthteller(b)) a_truth(truthteller(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  68[1:Spt:34.0] || a_truth(normal(b))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  69[2:Spt:35.0] || a_truth(truthteller(b))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  70[3:Spt:36.0] || a_truth(liar(b))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  71[3:Res:25.1,70.0] ||  -> a_truth(normal(b))* a_truth(truthteller(b)).
% 0.19/0.41  74[3:MRR:71.0,71.1,68.0,69.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  75[3:Spt:74.0,36.0,70.0] ||  -> a_truth(liar(b))*.
% 0.19/0.41  76[3:Spt:74.0,36.1] || a_truth(normal(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  77[3:MRR:33.0,75.0] || a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  78[3:MRR:39.0,75.0] || a_truth(truthteller(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  81[3:Res:25.1,77.0] ||  -> a_truth(normal(a))* a_truth(truthteller(a)).
% 0.19/0.41  82[3:MRR:81.0,76.0] ||  -> a_truth(truthteller(a))*.
% 0.19/0.41  83[3:MRR:82.0,78.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  84[2:Spt:83.0,35.0,69.0] ||  -> a_truth(truthteller(b))*.
% 0.19/0.41  85[2:Spt:83.0,35.1] || a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  86[2:MRR:38.0,84.0] || a_truth(normal(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  87[2:MRR:41.0,84.0] || a_truth(truthteller(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  88[2:Res:25.1,85.0] ||  -> a_truth(normal(a))* a_truth(truthteller(a)).
% 0.19/0.41  89[2:MRR:88.0,88.1,86.0,87.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  90[1:Spt:89.0,34.0,68.0] ||  -> a_truth(normal(b))*.
% 0.19/0.41  91[1:Spt:89.0,34.1] || a_truth(liar(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  92[1:MRR:37.0,90.0] || a_truth(normal(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  93[1:MRR:40.0,90.0] || a_truth(truthteller(a))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  94[1:Res:25.1,91.0] ||  -> a_truth(normal(a))* a_truth(truthteller(a)).
% 0.19/0.41  95[1:MRR:94.0,94.1,92.0,93.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : a_and_b_truthteller a_truthteller_b_normal a_truthteller_b_liar a_normal_b_truthteller a_and_b_normal a_normal_b_liar a_liar_b_truthteller a_liar_b_normal a_and_b_liar prove_there_is_an_answer person_is_one_type
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------