TSTP Solution File: PUZ019-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ019-1 : TPTP v5.1.0. Bugfixed v5.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2800MHz
% Memory : 2005MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:02:11 EDT 2011
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16028/PUZ/PUZ019-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 151] [nf = 0] [nu = 134] [ut = 95]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 518] [nf = 4] [nu = 426] [ut = 95]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1379] [nf = 14] [nu = 1073] [ut = 100]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3602] [nf = 40] [nu = 2559] [ut = 104]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9360] [nf = 98] [nu = 5964] [ut = 106]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25695] [nf = 407] [nu = 13884] [ut = 106]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74716] [nf = 1197] [nu = 33466] [ut = 106]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 222515] [nf = 3622] [nu = 81565] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 654357] [nf = 9894] [nu = 201997] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1863884] [nf = 29911] [nu = 497022] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 17 secs [nr = 5293533] [nf = 82098] [nu = 1234389] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 47 secs [nr = 14534370] [nf = 235023] [nu = 3053045] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 36996012] [nf = 544159] [nu = 6261232] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 36996413] [nf = 544163] [nu = 6261545] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 36997370] [nf = 544175] [nu = 6262236] [ut = 108]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 37000954] [nf = 544541] [nu = 6263883] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 37077252] [nf = 546514] [nu = 6273394] [ut = 123]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 38108730] [nf = 568892] [nu = 6392010] [ut = 126]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 191 secs [nr = 48220920] [nf = 733119] [nu = 7655903] [ut = 126]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 63757206
% resolvents: 62849134 factors: 908072
% Number of unit clauses generated: 9736124
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 15.27
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 44 [1] = 51 [3] = 5
% [4] = 5 [5] = 16 [6] = 3 [8] = 6
% Total = 130
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 9736124 [2] = 32589056 [3] = 18666477 [4] = 2096884 [5] = 499731 [6] = 161948
% [7] = 6986
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] educated_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [1] female_1 (+)2 (-)2
% [2] male_1 (+)2 (-)2
% [3] equal_jobs_2 (+)7 (-)56
% [4] equal_people_2 (+)4 (-)12
% [5] has_job_2 (+)6 (-)24
% [6] husband_2 (+)1 (-)10
% ------------------
% Total: (+)23 (-)107
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 130
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 67440558
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 5242604
% Number of successful unifications: 63757206
% Number of unification failures: 640294501
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 603
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 162340318
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 579614729
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 24
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6856395
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 52
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 250
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.21
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 53
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 704051707
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6856481
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 10.53 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 212524
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 301 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------