TSTP Solution File: PUZ018-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : PUZ018-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.74s 1.94s
% Output : Refutation 1.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : PUZ018-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 29 00:25:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Sun May 29 00:25:42 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14502.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35 49 back subsumes 38.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 50
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.13/0.40 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.13/0.40 distinct function count: 0
% 0.13/0.40 distinct constant count: 10
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.74/1.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.74/1.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 6 [ 2 0 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 7 [ 3 15 198210 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 8 [ 3 9 209051 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 9 [ 3 3 90896 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 10 [ 3 19 225313 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 11 [ 6 0 1358 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 12 [ 7 0 54 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 13 [ 8 1 16870 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.55 sec ----> 170 [hyper,168,30,42,43,44,167,154] {-} $F.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Length of proof is 17. Level of proof is 8.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.74/1.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.74/1.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 1 [] {+} -all_on(A)|on(a,A).
% 1.74/1.94 2 [] {+} -all_on(A)|on(b,A).
% 1.74/1.94 3 [] {+} -all_on(A)|on(c,A).
% 1.74/1.94 6 [] {+} -same_person(a,b).
% 1.74/1.94 7 [] {+} -same_person(a,c).
% 1.74/1.94 10 [] {+} -same_day(sunday,tuesday).
% 1.74/1.94 12 [] {+} -same_day(sunday,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 21 [] {+} -same_day(tuesday,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 30 [] {+} -consecutive(A,B)| -consecutive(B,C)| -consecutive(C,D)| -on(E,A)| -on(E,B)| -on(E,C).
% 1.74/1.94 31 [] {+} -on(a,sunday).
% 1.74/1.94 32 [] {+} -on(a,tuesday).
% 1.74/1.94 33 [] {+} -on(a,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 34 [] {+} -on(b,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 35 [] {+} -on(b,saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 36 [] {+} -on(c,sunday).
% 1.74/1.94 37 [] {+} -all_on(friday).
% 1.74/1.94 41 [] {+} consecutive(sunday,monday).
% 1.74/1.94 42 [] {+} consecutive(monday,tuesday).
% 1.74/1.94 43 [] {+} consecutive(tuesday,wednesday).
% 1.74/1.94 44 [] {+} consecutive(wednesday,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 45 [] {+} consecutive(thursday,friday).
% 1.74/1.94 50 [] {-} all_on(sunday)|all_on(monday)|all_on(tuesday)|all_on(wednesday)|all_on(thursday)|all_on(friday)|all_on(saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 51 [copy,50,unit_del,37] {-} all_on(sunday)|all_on(monday)|all_on(tuesday)|all_on(wednesday)|all_on(thursday)|all_on(saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 52 [] {-} on(A,B)|on(A,C)|on(D,B)|on(D,C)|same_person(A,D)|same_day(B,C).
% 1.74/1.94 53 [hyper,51,3,unit_del,36] {-} all_on(monday)|all_on(tuesday)|all_on(wednesday)|all_on(thursday)|all_on(saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 72 [hyper,53,1,unit_del,32] {-} all_on(monday)|all_on(wednesday)|all_on(thursday)|all_on(saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 87 [hyper,72,2,unit_del,34] {-} all_on(monday)|all_on(wednesday)|all_on(saturday).
% 1.74/1.94 97 [hyper,87,2,unit_del,35] {+} all_on(monday)|all_on(wednesday).
% 1.74/1.94 98 [hyper,97,3] {+} all_on(wednesday)|on(c,monday).
% 1.74/1.94 99 [hyper,97,2] {+} all_on(wednesday)|on(b,monday).
% 1.74/1.94 105 [hyper,52,7] {-} on(a,A)|on(a,B)|on(c,A)|on(c,B)|same_day(A,B).
% 1.74/1.94 106 [hyper,52,6] {-} on(a,A)|on(a,B)|on(b,A)|on(b,B)|same_day(A,B).
% 1.74/1.94 107 [hyper,98,3] {+} on(c,monday)|on(c,wednesday).
% 1.74/1.94 110 [hyper,99,3] {+} on(b,monday)|on(c,wednesday).
% 1.74/1.94 152 [hyper,105,12,unit_del,31,33,36] {+} on(c,thursday).
% 1.74/1.94 154 [hyper,105,10,unit_del,31,32,36] {+} on(c,tuesday).
% 1.74/1.94 162 [hyper,106,21,unit_del,32,33,34] {+} on(b,tuesday).
% 1.74/1.94 164 [hyper,106,12,unit_del,31,33,34] {+} on(b,sunday).
% 1.74/1.94 167 [hyper,107,30,43,44,45,154,152] {+} on(c,monday).
% 1.74/1.94 168 [hyper,110,30,41,42,43,164,162] {-} on(c,wednesday).
% 1.74/1.94 170 [hyper,168,30,42,43,44,167,154] {-} $F.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.74/1.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ============ end of search ============
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 true clauses given 13 (27.7%)
% 1.74/1.94 false clauses given 34
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 FALSE TRUE
% 1.74/1.94 3 0 1
% 1.74/1.94 tot: 0 1 (100.0% true)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Model 13 [ 8 -6 16870 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.74/1.94
% 1.74/1.94 Process 14502 finished Sun May 29 00:25:44 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------