TSTP Solution File: PUZ016-2.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ016-2.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:54:11 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23014/PUZ/PUZ016-2.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28] [nf = 0] [nu = 5] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 263] [nf = 0] [nu = 14] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1117] [nf = 18] [nu = 41] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6223] [nf = 248] [nu = 168] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28090] [nf = 1332] [nu = 711] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 104912] [nf = 5398] [nu = 2986] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 389740] [nf = 18340] [nu = 12875] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1502262] [nf = 80111] [nu = 55278] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 5813970] [nf = 291046] [nu = 239499] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21947827] [nf = 1156480] [nu = 1029603] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21948062] [nf = 1156480] [nu = 1029612] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21948916] [nf = 1156498] [nu = 1029639] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21954022] [nf = 1156728] [nu = 1029766] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 21975889] [nf = 1157812] [nu = 1030309] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 22052711] [nf = 1161878] [nu = 1032584] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 22337539] [nf = 1174820] [nu = 1042473] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 131 secs [nr = 23450061] [nf = 1236591] [nu = 1084876] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 156 secs [nr = 27761769] [nf = 1447526] [nu = 1269097] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 251 secs [nr = 44912403] [nf = 2381874] [nu = 2059260] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 57433928
% resolvents: 54644976 factors: 2788952
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2815771
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.90
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5 [1] = 3
% Total = 8
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2815771 [2] = 26174925 [3] = 28443232
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] horizontal_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] horizontal_1_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] horizontal_1_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] horizontal_1_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] horizontal_2_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] horizontal_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] horizontal_2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] horizontal_2_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] horizontal_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] horizontal_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] horizontal_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] horizontal_3_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] horizontal_4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] horizontal_4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] horizontal_4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] horizontal_4_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] horizontal_5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] horizontal_5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] horizontal_5_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] horizontal_5_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] vertical_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [21] vertical_1_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [22] vertical_1_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [23] vertical_1_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] vertical_1_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] vertical_2_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [26] vertical_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] vertical_2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] vertical_2_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] vertical_2_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] vertical_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] vertical_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] vertical_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] vertical_3_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] vertical_3_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] vertical_4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] vertical_4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] vertical_4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] vertical_4_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] vertical_4_5 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)7
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 8
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 86964086
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 417071150
% Number of successful unifications: 57433928
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 148366413
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3524986902
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 2163213
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 74
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 57433928
% ConstructUnitClause() = 2163216
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 1.85 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 191446
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------