TSTP Solution File: PUZ016-2.004 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : PUZ016-2.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : PUZ016-2.004 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat May 28 22:25:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Sat May 28 22:25:55 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1868.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 0.12/0.35  optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(propositional).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -horizontal_1_2.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -horizontal_1_1| -vertical_1_1.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -horizontal_1_3| -vertical_1_4.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_2| -horizontal_2_2.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_2| -vertical_2_2.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_2| -horizontal_2_1.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_3| -horizontal_2_3.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_3| -vertical_2_3.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [propositional] {-} -vertical_1_3| -horizontal_2_2.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 43
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 57
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 75
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 24
% 0.12/0.38     distinct predicate count: 0
% 0.12/0.38     distinct function count: 0
% 0.12/0.38     distinct constant count: 24
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ============ end of search ============
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  true clauses given          25      (92.6%)
% 0.12/0.39  false clauses given          2
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.12/0.39  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Process 1868 finished Sat May 28 22:25:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------