TSTP Solution File: PUZ016-2.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ016-2.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:54:01 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19559/PUZ/PUZ016-2.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30] [nf = 0] [nu = 10] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 204] [nf = 0] [nu = 28] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1084] [nf = 18] [nu = 82] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6454] [nf = 226] [nu = 324] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30420] [nf = 1074] [nu = 1398] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 129872] [nf = 5241] [nu = 5916] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 548207] [nf = 20096] [nu = 25706] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2363063] [nf = 97002] [nu = 110608] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 10157501] [nf = 398797] [nu = 481738] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 37227645] [nf = 1559321] [nu = 1837945] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 37227819] [nf = 1559321] [nu = 1837963] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 121 secs [nr = 37228699] [nf = 1559339] [nu = 1838017] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 37234069] [nf = 1559547] [nu = 1838259] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 37258035] [nf = 1560395] [nu = 1839333] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 37357487] [nf = 1564562] [nu = 1843851] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 37775822] [nf = 1579417] [nu = 1863641] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 39590678] [nf = 1656323] [nu = 1948543] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 154 secs [nr = 47385116] [nf = 1958118] [nu = 2319673] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 266 secs [nr = 81248661] [nf = 3404039] [nu = 3918519] [ut = 11]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 95918214
% resolvents: 92140011 factors: 3778203
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4635226
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.83
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 5 [1] = 6
% Total = 11
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4635226 [2] = 46865782 [3] = 44417206
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] horizontal_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] horizontal_1_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] horizontal_1_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] horizontal_2_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] horizontal_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] horizontal_2_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [6] horizontal_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] horizontal_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] horizontal_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] horizontal_4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] horizontal_4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] horizontal_4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] vertical_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [13] vertical_1_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [14] vertical_1_3 (+)0 (-)1
% [15] vertical_1_4 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] vertical_2_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [17] vertical_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] vertical_2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] vertical_2_4 (+)0 (-)1
% [20] vertical_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] vertical_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] vertical_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] vertical_3_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)9
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 11
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 104703985
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 286982280
% Number of successful unifications: 95918214
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 245752098
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2770972862
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3563432
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 58
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 95918214
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3563438
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 3.09 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 319727
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------