TSTP Solution File: PUZ015-2.006 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ015-2.006 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:53:43 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6380/PUZ/PUZ015-2.006+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 308] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1142] [nf = 10] [nu = 0] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5094] [nf = 216] [nu = 24] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19926] [nf = 1232] [nu = 48] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60202] [nf = 3458] [nu = 72] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 190996] [nf = 10496] [nu = 320] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 627470] [nf = 44468] [nu = 1192] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 22 secs [nr = 1935522] [nf = 130618] [nu = 2064] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 63 secs [nr = 5862500] [nf = 421106] [nu = 4984] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10795813] [nf = 754887] [nu = 12248] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10796105] [nf = 754887] [nu = 12248] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10796939] [nf = 754897] [nu = 12248] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10800891] [nf = 755103] [nu = 12272] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 10815723] [nf = 756119] [nu = 12296] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 10855999] [nf = 758345] [nu = 12320] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 10986793] [nf = 765383] [nu = 12568] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 11423267] [nf = 799355] [nu = 13440] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 144 secs [nr = 12731319] [nf = 885505] [nu = 14312] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 185 secs [nr = 16658297] [nf = 1175993] [nu = 17232] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 28630647
% resolvents: 26769627 factors: 1861020
% Number of unit clauses generated: 28344
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.10
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4
% Total = 4
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 28344 [2] = 6846324 [3] = 21755979
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] horizontal_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] horizontal_1_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] horizontal_1_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] horizontal_1_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] horizontal_1_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] horizontal_2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] horizontal_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] horizontal_2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] horizontal_2_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] horizontal_2_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] horizontal_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] horizontal_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] horizontal_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] horizontal_3_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] horizontal_3_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] horizontal_4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] horizontal_4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] horizontal_4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] horizontal_4_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] horizontal_4_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] horizontal_5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] horizontal_5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] horizontal_5_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] horizontal_5_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] horizontal_5_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] horizontal_6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] horizontal_6_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] horizontal_6_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] horizontal_6_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] horizontal_6_5 (+)0 (-)1
% [30] vertical_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [31] vertical_1_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] vertical_1_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] vertical_1_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] vertical_1_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] vertical_1_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] vertical_2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] vertical_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] vertical_2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] vertical_2_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] vertical_2_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] vertical_2_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] vertical_3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] vertical_3_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] vertical_3_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] vertical_3_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] vertical_3_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] vertical_3_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] vertical_4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] vertical_4_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] vertical_4_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] vertical_4_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] vertical_4_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] vertical_4_6 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] vertical_5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] vertical_5_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] vertical_5_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] vertical_5_4 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] vertical_5_5 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] vertical_5_6 (+)0 (-)1
% ------------------
% Total: (+)0 (-)4
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 4
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 43250815
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 817026052
% Number of successful unifications: 28630647
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 84941866
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 4219498367
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 20424
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 94
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 28630647
% ConstructUnitClause() = 20424
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.03 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 95435
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------