TSTP Solution File: PUZ013-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PUZ013-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:55:18 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6177/PUZ/PUZ013-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 2] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52] [nf = 1] [nu = 9] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~some_monitors_are_awake
% B1: some_english_sing
% B2: some_scotch_dance_not
% B6: some_monitors_are_awake | some_monitors_are_not_awake
% B9: ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not | some_monitors_are_awake
% B10: ~some_english_sing | ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not
% B15: ~some_irish_fight_not | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_germans_play
% B19: ~some_english_sing | ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > some_english_sing
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > some_scotch_dance_not
% U3: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_monitors_are_not_awake
% U4: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > ~some_english_sing_not
% U5: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_irish_fight_not
% U6: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_germans_play
% U7: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_english_sing_not
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% some_english_sing ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% some_scotch_dance_not ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% ~some_monitors_are_awake ....... B0
% some_monitors_are_awake | some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... B6
% some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... R1 [B0:L0, B6:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U4:
% ~some_monitors_are_awake ....... B0
% ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not | some_monitors_are_awake ....... B9
% ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not ....... R1 [B0:L0, B9:L2]
% some_english_sing ....... U1
% ~some_english_sing_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U5:
% some_english_sing ....... B1
% ~some_english_sing | ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not ....... B10
% ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not ....... R1 [B1:L0, B10:L0]
% some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... U3
% some_irish_fight_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U3:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U6:
% some_scotch_dance_not ....... B2
% ~some_irish_fight_not | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_germans_play ....... B15
% ~some_irish_fight_not | some_germans_play ....... R1 [B2:L0, B15:L1]
% some_irish_fight_not ....... U5
% some_germans_play ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U7:
% some_english_sing ....... B1
% ~some_english_sing | ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... B19
% ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... R1 [B1:L0, B19:L0]
% some_germans_play ....... U6
% ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U6:L0]
% some_scotch_dance_not ....... U2
% some_english_sing_not ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% some_english_sing_not ....... U7
% ~some_english_sing_not ....... U4
% [] ....... R1 [U7:L0, U4:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 77
% resolvents: 76 factors: 1
% Number of unit clauses generated: 18
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 23.38
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 3 [1] = 1 [2] = 3 [3] = 1
% Total = 8
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 18 [2] = 33 [3] = 26
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] some_english_sing (+)1 (-)0
% [1] some_english_sing_not (+)1 (-)1
% [2] some_germans_play (+)1 (-)0
% [3] some_germans_play_not (+)0 (-)0
% [4] some_irish_fight (+)0 (-)0
% [5] some_irish_fight_not (+)1 (-)0
% [6] some_monitors_are_awake (+)0 (-)1
% [7] some_monitors_are_not_awake (+)1 (-)0
% [8] some_of_the_eleven_are_not_oiling (+)0 (-)0
% [9] some_scotch_dance (+)0 (-)0
% [10] some_scotch_dance_not (+)1 (-)0
% [11] some_welsh_eat (+)0 (-)0
% [12] some_welsh_eat_not (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)6 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 8
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 168
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 87
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 191
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 299
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 87
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.14 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------