TSTP Solution File: PUZ007-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : PUZ007-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:10:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PUZ007-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 28 20:49:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.36 #
% 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.36 # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 27
% 0.13/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.36 # 27 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.36 # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.36 # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.36 # 23 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.36 # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.13/0.36 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.36 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (statement_by(a)=a_from_mars)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (statement_by(b)=a_has_lied)).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (says(a,a_from_mars))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (says(b,a_has_lied))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (from_mars(b)|from_mars(a))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (from_venus(b)|from_venus(a))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (from_mars(a)|~a_truth(a_from_mars))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~from_venus(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~female(X1)|~male(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~liar(X1)|~truthteller(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (~a_truth(a_from_mars)|~a_truth(a_has_lied))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~a_truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~liar(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (male(b)|~female(a))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (a_truth(a_from_mars)|~from_mars(a))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (female(b)|~male(a))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (from_venus(X1)|from_mars(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (female(X1)|male(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (liar(X1)|truthteller(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~a_truth(statement_by(X1)))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~male(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~female(X1)|~from_venus(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (liar(X1)|~female(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (a_truth(a_has_lied)|a_truth(a_from_mars))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (liar(X1)|~male(X1)|~from_venus(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=statement_by(X2)|~says(X2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (a_truth(statement_by(X1))|liar(X1))).
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (a_truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truthteller(X2))).
% 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (from_mars(b)|from_mars(a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (from_mars(b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_167, plain, (~from_venus(b)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_56])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (from_mars(a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_60, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_266, plain, (from_venus(a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_266, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, hypothesis, (statement_by(a)=a_from_mars)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_51, hypothesis, (statement_by(b)=a_has_lied)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (says(a,a_from_mars))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, hypothesis, (says(b,a_has_lied))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (from_mars(b)|from_mars(a))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (from_venus(b)|from_venus(a))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, hypothesis, (from_mars(a)|~a_truth(a_from_mars))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~from_venus(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~female(X1)|~male(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~liar(X1)|~truthteller(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_49, hypothesis, (~a_truth(a_from_mars)|~a_truth(a_has_lied))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (~a_truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~liar(X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, hypothesis, (male(b)|~female(a))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, hypothesis, (a_truth(a_from_mars)|~from_mars(a))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_54, hypothesis, (female(b)|~male(a))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (from_venus(X1)|from_mars(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (female(X1)|male(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (liar(X1)|truthteller(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~a_truth(statement_by(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~male(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (truthteller(X1)|~female(X1)|~from_venus(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (liar(X1)|~female(X1)|~from_mars(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_52, hypothesis, (a_truth(a_has_lied)|a_truth(a_from_mars))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (liar(X1)|~male(X1)|~from_venus(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=statement_by(X2)|~says(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (a_truth(statement_by(X1))|liar(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (a_truth(X1)|~says(X2,X1)|~truthteller(X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (from_venus(b)|from_venus(a)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (from_venus(a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_116, plain, (~from_mars(a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (from_venus(b)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_57, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_218, plain, (~a_truth(a_from_mars)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_218, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # Child (18513) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------