TSTP Solution File: PUZ005+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : PUZ005+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:07:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.46s 2.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 12 unt; 8 nHn; 40 RR)
% Number of literals : 88 ( 0 equ; 48 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
( wednesday(yesterday(X1))
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
thursday(a_thursday),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,X2)
| ~ day(X2)
| ~ day(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| ~ wednesday(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_45,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,X2,X1)
| ~ day(X1)
| ~ day(X2)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_32,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( ~ thursday(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ wednesday(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_31,plain,
( ~ wednesday(X1)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( ~ day(X1)
| ~ lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,yesterday(X1))
| ~ lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,X1,yesterday(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-11cj2469/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( wednesday(yesterday(X1))
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
thursday(a_thursday),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,X2)
| ~ day(X2)
| ~ day(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X2) ),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X1) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| ~ wednesday(X1) ),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
wednesday(yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,X2,X1)
| ~ day(X1)
| ~ day(X2)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X2) ),
i_0_45 ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X1) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,X2)
| ~ lion_lies(X2)
| ~ day(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
lion_lies(yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ thursday(X1) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( ~ thursday(X1)
| ~ lion_lies(X1) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,X2,X1)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X2)
| ~ day(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
unicorn_lies(a_thursday),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( day(X1)
| ~ wednesday(X1) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( ~ wednesday(X1)
| ~ unicorn_lies(X1) ),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( lion_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,yesterday(a_thursday))
| ~ day(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
day(a_thursday),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
~ lion_lies(a_thursday),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( unicorn_lies(X1)
| lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,a_thursday,X1)
| ~ day(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
day(yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
~ unicorn_lies(yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
( ~ day(X1)
| ~ lies_on_one_of(a_lion,X1,yesterday(X1))
| ~ lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,X1,yesterday(X1)) ),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
lies_on_one_of(a_lion,a_thursday,yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_79]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
lies_on_one_of(a_unicorn,a_thursday,yesterday(a_thursday)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_85]),c_0_78])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : PUZ005+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat May 28 22:09:27 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.46/2.35 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.46/2.35 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.46/2.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.46/2.35 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0e
% 7.46/2.35 # and selection function SelectLargestNegLit.
% 7.46/2.35 #
% 7.46/2.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 7.46/2.35
% 7.46/2.35 # Proof found!
% 7.46/2.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.46/2.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.46/2.35 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.46/2.35
% 7.46/2.35 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.46/2.35 # User time : 0.029 s
% 7.46/2.35 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.46/2.35 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 7.46/2.35 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.46/2.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------