TSTP Solution File: PUZ003-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : PUZ003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:11:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  21   ~;  18   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    member(petruchio),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',petruchio) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ~ member(petruchio),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    member(lorenzo),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lorenzo) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ member(lorenzo)
    | ~ member(petruchio) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f22,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ~ shaved(petruchio,lorenzo),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_petruchio_has_shaved_lorenzo) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( shaved(X1,X0)
      | ~ member(X0)
      | ~ member(X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f18,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ shaved(members,X0)
      | ~ member(X1)
      | shaved(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',all_shaved_then_one_shaved) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( shaved(members,X1)
      | ~ member(X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f17,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    member(guido),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',guido) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ member(guido)
      | shaved(members,X1)
      | ~ member(X1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( shaved(members,X1)
      | ~ member(guido)
      | ~ member(X1)
      | ~ member(X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ shaved(X0,X1)
      | shaved(members,X0)
      | ~ member(X0)
      | ~ member(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',one_shaved_then_all_shaved) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( shaved(X0,guido)
      | ~ member(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f2]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    shaved(members,guido),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f10,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    member(cesare),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cesare) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( shaved(members,guido)
    | ~ member(cesare) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f3]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ~ member(guido)
    | shaved(members,guido)
    | ~ member(cesare) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    shaved(guido,cesare),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',guido_has_shaved_cesare) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : PUZ003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 10:37:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  % (12706)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (12710)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (12702)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (12710)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50  % (12699)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (12694)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.50  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Time elapsed: 0.057 s
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (12710)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  % (12687)Success in time 0.152 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------