TSTP Solution File: PUZ002-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : PUZ002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:23:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.96s
% Output : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : PUZ002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 29 01:27:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.95 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.95 Process 12658 was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.95 Sun May 29 01:27:24 2022
% 0.41/0.95 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_12505_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_12505_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.95 set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.95 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.95 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.95 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.95 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.95 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.95 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.95 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.95 clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (12 formulas)
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.41/0.95
% 0.41/0.95 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.41/0.95 1 -kangaroo(A) | -suitable_pet(A) # label(kangaroos_are_not_pets) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 2 kangaroo(the_kangaroo) # label(kangaroo_is_a_kangaroo) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 Derived: -suitable_pet(the_kangaroo). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.41/0.95 3 -takes_to_me(A) | in_house(A) # label(in_house_if_takes_to_me) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 4 takes_to_me(A) | detested(A) # label(takes_to_me_or_detested) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 Derived: in_house(A) | detested(A). [resolve(3,a,4,a)].
% 0.41/0.95 5 -detested(A) | avoided(A) # label(avoid_detested) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 6 -avoided(the_kangaroo) # label(avoid_kangaroo) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.95 Derived: -detested(the_kangaroo). [resolve(5,b,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 7 in_house(A) | detested(A). [resolve(3,a,4,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 8 -in_house(A) | cat(A) # label(only_cats_in_house) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: detested(A) | cat(A). [resolve(7,a,8,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 9 -prowler(A) | gazer(A) # label(prowlers_are_gazers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 10 -gazer(A) | suitable_pet(A) # label(gazers_are_suitable_pets) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: -prowler(A) | suitable_pet(A). [resolve(9,b,10,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 11 -mouse_killer(A) | carnivore(A) # label(mouse_killers_are_carnivores) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 12 -carnivore(A) | prowler(A) # label(carnivores_are_prowlers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: -mouse_killer(A) | prowler(A). [resolve(11,b,12,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 13 detested(A) | cat(A). [resolve(7,a,8,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 14 -cat(A) | mouse_killer(A) # label(cats_are_mice_killers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: detested(A) | mouse_killer(A). [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 15 -prowler(A) | suitable_pet(A). [resolve(9,b,10,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 16 -suitable_pet(the_kangaroo). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: -prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(15,b,16,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 17 detested(A) | mouse_killer(A). [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 18 -detested(the_kangaroo). [resolve(5,b,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: mouse_killer(the_kangaroo). [resolve(17,a,18,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 19 mouse_killer(the_kangaroo). [resolve(17,a,18,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 20 -mouse_killer(A) | prowler(A). [resolve(11,b,12,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(19,a,20,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 21 prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(19,a,20,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 22 -prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(15,b,16,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 Derived: $F. [resolve(21,a,22,a)].
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 Auto_denials: (no changes).
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.41/0.96 Function symbol KB weights:
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.41/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.96 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.41/0.96 % Length of proof is 23.
% 0.41/0.96 % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.41/0.96 % Maximum clause weight is 0.000.
% 0.41/0.96 % Given clauses 0.
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 1 -kangaroo(A) | -suitable_pet(A) # label(kangaroos_are_not_pets) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 2 kangaroo(the_kangaroo) # label(kangaroo_is_a_kangaroo) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 3 -takes_to_me(A) | in_house(A) # label(in_house_if_takes_to_me) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 4 takes_to_me(A) | detested(A) # label(takes_to_me_or_detested) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 5 -detested(A) | avoided(A) # label(avoid_detested) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 6 -avoided(the_kangaroo) # label(avoid_kangaroo) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 7 in_house(A) | detested(A). [resolve(3,a,4,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 8 -in_house(A) | cat(A) # label(only_cats_in_house) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 9 -prowler(A) | gazer(A) # label(prowlers_are_gazers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 10 -gazer(A) | suitable_pet(A) # label(gazers_are_suitable_pets) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 11 -mouse_killer(A) | carnivore(A) # label(mouse_killers_are_carnivores) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 12 -carnivore(A) | prowler(A) # label(carnivores_are_prowlers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 13 detested(A) | cat(A). [resolve(7,a,8,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 14 -cat(A) | mouse_killer(A) # label(cats_are_mice_killers) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.41/0.96 15 -prowler(A) | suitable_pet(A). [resolve(9,b,10,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 16 -suitable_pet(the_kangaroo). [resolve(1,a,2,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 17 detested(A) | mouse_killer(A). [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 18 -detested(the_kangaroo). [resolve(5,b,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 19 mouse_killer(the_kangaroo). [resolve(17,a,18,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 20 -mouse_killer(A) | prowler(A). [resolve(11,b,12,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 21 prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(19,a,20,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 22 -prowler(the_kangaroo). [resolve(15,b,16,a)].
% 0.41/0.96 23 $F. [resolve(21,a,22,a)].
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 Given=0. Generated=1. Kept=0. proofs=1.
% 0.41/0.96 Usable=0. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=23. Hints=0.
% 0.41/0.96 Megabytes=0.02.
% 0.41/0.96 User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.41/0.96 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.41/0.96
% 0.41/0.96 Process 12658 exit (max_proofs) Sun May 29 01:27:24 2022
% 0.41/0.96 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------