TSTP Solution File: PUZ001-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PUZ001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:10:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : PUZ001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 22:30:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 % File : PUZ001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.19/0.61 % Domain : Puzzles
% 0.19/0.61 % Problem : Dreadbury Mansion
% 0.19/0.61 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.61 % Theorem formulation : Made unsatisfiable.
% 0.19/0.61 % English : Someone who lives in Dreadbury Mansion killed Aunt Agatha.
% 0.19/0.61 % Agatha, the butler, and Charles live in Dreadbury Mansion,
% 0.19/0.61 % and are the only people who live therein. A killer always
% 0.19/0.61 % hates his victim, and is never richer than his victim.
% 0.19/0.61 % Charles hates no one that Aunt Agatha hates. Agatha hates
% 0.19/0.61 % everyone except the butler. The butler hates everyone not
% 0.19/0.61 % richer than Aunt Agatha. The butler hates everyone Aunt
% 0.19/0.61 % Agatha hates. No one hates everyone. Agatha is not the
% 0.19/0.61 % butler. Therefore : Agatha killed herself.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Refs : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.19/0.61 % : [MB88] Manthey & Bry (1988), SATCHMO: A Theorem Prover Implem
% 0.19/0.61 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.19/0.61 % Names :
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.19/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 12 RR)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of literals : 21 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.61 % Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.19/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 % Comments : Modified from the [MB88] version to be unsatisfiable, by Geoff
% 0.19/0.61 % Sutcliffe.
% 0.19/0.61 % : Also known as "Who killed Aunt Agatha"
% 0.19/0.61 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(agatha,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 lives(agatha) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(butler,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 lives(butler) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(charles,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 lives(charles) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(poorer_killer,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ killed(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ richer(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(different_hates,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ hates(agatha,X)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ hates(charles,X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(no_one_hates_everyone,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.61 ( ~ hates(X,agatha)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ hates(X,butler)
% 0.19/0.61 | ~ hates(X,charles) ) ).
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 cnf(agatha_hates_agatha,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.62 hates(agatha,agatha) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(agatha_hates_charles,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.62 hates(agatha,charles) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(killer_hates_victim,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ~ killed(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.62 | hates(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(same_hates,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ~ hates(agatha,X)
% 0.19/0.62 | hates(butler,X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(butler_hates_poor,hypothesis,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ~ lives(X)
% 0.19/0.62 | richer(X,agatha)
% 0.19/0.62 | hates(butler,X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %----Literal dropped from here to make it unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(prove_neither_charles_nor_butler_did_it,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62 ( killed(butler,agatha)
% 0.19/0.62 | killed(charles,agatha) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 6
% 0.19/0.62 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]P1(a2)
% 0.19/0.62 [3]P1(a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [4]P2(a1,a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [5]P2(a1,a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [6]P3(a2,a1)+P3(a3,a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [8]~P2(a1,x81)+P2(a2,x81)
% 0.19/0.62 [10]~P2(a3,x101)+~P2(a1,x101)
% 0.19/0.62 [9]~P3(x91,x92)+P2(x91,x92)
% 0.19/0.62 [11]~P4(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x112)
% 0.19/0.62 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(a2,x71)+P4(x71,a1)
% 0.19/0.62 [12]~P2(x121,a2)+~P2(x121,a3)+~P2(x121,a1)
% 0.19/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P2(a2,a1)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,10,9,12,8])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 (P2(a2,a2)),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,5,10,9,12,8,6,11,7])).
% 0.19/0.62 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.19/0.62 ($false),
% 0.19/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,17,22,12,8]),
% 0.19/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------