TSTP Solution File: PUZ001+2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : PUZ001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:11:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   60 (  18 unt;  23 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  147 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   37 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (  52   ~;  41   |;  53   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   34 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   23 (  10   >;  13   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;  13 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  114 (  15 sgn;  48   !;  30   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    live: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    predicate1: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    in: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    'DreadburyMansion': $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    modifier_pp: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    kill: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    'AuntAgatha': $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    predicate2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    'Butler': $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    'Charles': $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    hate: $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    rich: $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    comp_than: $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    property2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk4_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk5_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk6_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    esk7_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    esk8_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    esk9_1: $i > $i ).

fof(background,axiom,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( $true
      & predicate1(X2,live,X1)
      & modifier_pp(X2,in,'DreadburyMansion')
      & predicate2(X3,kill,X1,'AuntAgatha')
      & ! [X4,X5] :
          ( ( $true
            & predicate1(X5,live,X4)
            & modifier_pp(X5,in,'DreadburyMansion') )
         => ( X4 = 'AuntAgatha'
            | X4 = 'Butler'
            | X4 = 'Charles' ) )
      & ! [X6] :
          ( $true
         => ! [X7,X8] :
              ( ( $true
                & predicate2(X8,kill,X6,X7) )
             => ? [X9] : predicate2(X9,hate,X6,X7) ) )
      & ! [X10] :
          ( $true
         => ~ ? [X11,X12,X13] :
                ( $true
                & predicate2(X12,kill,X10,X11)
                & property2(X13,rich,comp_than,X11)
                & X10 = X13 ) )
      & ! [X14,X15] :
          ( ( $true
            & predicate2(X15,hate,'AuntAgatha',X14) )
         => ~ ? [X16] : predicate2(X16,hate,'Charles',X14) )
      & ~ ? [X17] : predicate2(X17,hate,'AuntAgatha','Butler')
      & ! [X18] :
          ( ( $true
            & X18 != 'Butler' )
         => ? [X19] : predicate2(X19,hate,'AuntAgatha',X18) )
      & ! [X20] :
          ( ( $true
            & ~ ? [X21] :
                  ( property2(X21,rich,comp_than,'AuntAgatha')
                  & X20 = X21 ) )
         => ? [X22] : predicate2(X22,hate,'Butler',X20) )
      & ! [X23,X24] :
          ( ( $true
            & predicate2(X24,hate,'AuntAgatha',X23) )
         => ? [X25] : predicate2(X25,hate,'Butler',X23) )
      & ! [X26] :
          ( $true
         => ~ ! [X27] :
                ( $true
               => ? [X28] : predicate2(X28,hate,X26,X27) ) )
      & 'AuntAgatha' != 'Butler' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',background) ).

fof(prove,conjecture,
    ? [X1] : predicate2(X1,kill,'AuntAgatha','AuntAgatha'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove) ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( predicate1(X2,live,X1)
      & modifier_pp(X2,in,'DreadburyMansion')
      & predicate2(X3,kill,X1,'AuntAgatha')
      & ! [X4,X5] :
          ( ( predicate1(X5,live,X4)
            & modifier_pp(X5,in,'DreadburyMansion') )
         => ( X4 = 'AuntAgatha'
            | X4 = 'Butler'
            | X4 = 'Charles' ) )
      & ! [X6,X7,X8] :
          ( predicate2(X8,kill,X6,X7)
         => ? [X9] : predicate2(X9,hate,X6,X7) )
      & ! [X10] :
          ~ ? [X11,X12,X13] :
              ( predicate2(X12,kill,X10,X11)
              & property2(X13,rich,comp_than,X11)
              & X10 = X13 )
      & ! [X14,X15] :
          ( predicate2(X15,hate,'AuntAgatha',X14)
         => ~ ? [X16] : predicate2(X16,hate,'Charles',X14) )
      & ~ ? [X17] : predicate2(X17,hate,'AuntAgatha','Butler')
      & ! [X18] :
          ( X18 != 'Butler'
         => ? [X19] : predicate2(X19,hate,'AuntAgatha',X18) )
      & ! [X20] :
          ( ~ ? [X21] :
                ( property2(X21,rich,comp_than,'AuntAgatha')
                & X20 = X21 )
         => ? [X22] : predicate2(X22,hate,'Butler',X20) )
      & ! [X23,X24] :
          ( predicate2(X24,hate,'AuntAgatha',X23)
         => ? [X25] : predicate2(X25,hate,'Butler',X23) )
      & ! [X26] :
          ~ ! [X27] :
            ? [X28] : predicate2(X28,hate,X26,X27)
      & 'AuntAgatha' != 'Butler' ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[background]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X48,X51,X52,X54,X56] :
      ( predicate1(esk2_0,live,esk1_0)
      & modifier_pp(esk2_0,in,'DreadburyMansion')
      & predicate2(esk3_0,kill,esk1_0,'AuntAgatha')
      & ( ~ predicate1(X33,live,X32)
        | ~ modifier_pp(X33,in,'DreadburyMansion')
        | X32 = 'AuntAgatha'
        | X32 = 'Butler'
        | X32 = 'Charles' )
      & ( ~ predicate2(X36,kill,X34,X35)
        | predicate2(esk4_3(X34,X35,X36),hate,X34,X35) )
      & ( ~ predicate2(X40,kill,X38,X39)
        | ~ property2(X41,rich,comp_than,X39)
        | X38 != X41 )
      & ( ~ predicate2(X43,hate,'AuntAgatha',X42)
        | ~ predicate2(X44,hate,'Charles',X42) )
      & ~ predicate2(X45,hate,'AuntAgatha','Butler')
      & ( X46 = 'Butler'
        | predicate2(esk5_1(X46),hate,'AuntAgatha',X46) )
      & ( property2(esk6_1(X48),rich,comp_than,'AuntAgatha')
        | predicate2(esk7_1(X48),hate,'Butler',X48) )
      & ( X48 = esk6_1(X48)
        | predicate2(esk7_1(X48),hate,'Butler',X48) )
      & ( ~ predicate2(X52,hate,'AuntAgatha',X51)
        | predicate2(esk8_2(X51,X52),hate,'Butler',X51) )
      & ~ predicate2(X56,hate,X54,esk9_1(X54))
      & 'AuntAgatha' != 'Butler' ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ~ predicate2(X1,hate,X2,esk9_1(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( predicate2(esk8_2(X2,X1),hate,'Butler',X2)
    | ~ predicate2(X1,hate,'AuntAgatha',X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ~ predicate2(X1,hate,'AuntAgatha',esk9_1('Butler')),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = 'Butler'
    | predicate2(esk5_1(X1),hate,'AuntAgatha',X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ predicate2(X1,hate,'AuntAgatha',X2)
    | ~ predicate2(X3,hate,'Charles',X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( predicate2(esk4_3(X2,X3,X1),hate,X2,X3)
    | ~ predicate2(X1,kill,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X2 = 'AuntAgatha'
    | X2 = 'Butler'
    | X2 = 'Charles'
    | ~ predicate1(X1,live,X2)
    | ~ modifier_pp(X1,in,'DreadburyMansion') ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    modifier_pp(esk2_0,in,'DreadburyMansion'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = esk6_1(X1)
    | predicate2(esk7_1(X1),hate,'Butler',X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    esk9_1('Butler') = 'Butler',
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ predicate2(X1,hate,'AuntAgatha',X2)
    | ~ predicate2(X3,kill,'Charles',X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = 'AuntAgatha'
    | X1 = 'Butler'
    | X1 = 'Charles'
    | ~ predicate1(esk2_0,live,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    predicate1(esk2_0,live,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ predicate2(X1,kill,X2,X3)
    | ~ property2(X4,rich,comp_than,X3)
    | X2 != X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( property2(esk6_1(X1),rich,comp_than,'AuntAgatha')
    | predicate2(esk7_1(X1),hate,'Butler',X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    esk6_1('Butler') = 'Butler',
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ predicate2(X1,hate,'Butler','Butler'),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X1 = 'Butler'
    | ~ predicate2(X2,kill,'Charles',X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( 'Charles' = esk1_0
    | 'Butler' = esk1_0
    | 'AuntAgatha' = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ property2(X1,rich,comp_than,X2)
    | ~ predicate2(X3,kill,X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    property2('Butler',rich,comp_than,'AuntAgatha'),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( 'AuntAgatha' = esk1_0
    | 'Butler' = esk1_0
    | X1 = 'Butler'
    | ~ predicate2(X2,kill,esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    predicate2(esk3_0,kill,esk1_0,'AuntAgatha'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    'AuntAgatha' != 'Butler',
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] : predicate2(X1,kill,'AuntAgatha','AuntAgatha'),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ predicate2(X1,kill,'Butler','AuntAgatha'),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( 'Butler' = esk1_0
    | 'AuntAgatha' = esk1_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X57] : ~ predicate2(X57,kill,'AuntAgatha','AuntAgatha'),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( 'AuntAgatha' = esk1_0
    | ~ predicate2(X1,kill,esk1_0,'AuntAgatha') ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ predicate2(X1,kill,'AuntAgatha','AuntAgatha'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    'AuntAgatha' = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ predicate2(X1,kill,esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : PUZ001+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 22:56:05 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.59  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.60  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.20/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60  % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------