TSTP Solution File: PUZ001+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:11:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.79s 1.97s
% Output   : Refutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  13 unt;   5 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (  12 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ lives(A)
    | A = agatha
    | A = butler
    | A = charles ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ killed(A,B)
    | hates(A,B) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ killed(A,B)
    | ~ richer(A,B) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ hates(agatha,A)
    | ~ hates(charles,A) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ hates(agatha,A)
    | hates(butler,A) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ~ hates(A,dollar_f1(A)),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    agatha != butler,
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    butler != agatha,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[7])]),
    [iquote('copy,7,flip.1')] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ killed(agatha,agatha),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    lives(dollar_c1),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    killed(dollar_c1,agatha),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( A = butler
    | hates(agatha,A) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( richer(A,agatha)
    | hates(butler,A) ),
    file('PUZ001+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    hates(dollar_c1,agatha),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( butler = dollar_c1
    | charles = dollar_c1 ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,1]),9,11])])]),
    [iquote('para_into,12.1.1,1.2.1,unit_del,9,11,flip.1,flip.2')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ( A = butler
    | hates(butler,A) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,5')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    hates(butler,dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,3,12')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    dollar_f1(butler) = butler,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[27,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,27,6')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ~ hates(butler,butler),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,6]),
    [iquote('para_from,52.1.1,6.1.2')] ).

cnf(87,plain,
    charles = dollar_c1,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[66,22]),40]),
    [iquote('para_into,66.1.2,22.1.1,unit_del,40')] ).

cnf(92,plain,
    ( ~ hates(agatha,A)
    | ~ hates(dollar_c1,A) ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[4]),87]),
    [iquote('back_demod,4,demod,87')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    butler = agatha,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[92,16,19])]),
    [iquote('hyper,92,16,19,flip.1')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[104,8]),
    [iquote('binary,104.1,8.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 01:43:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.79/1.97  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.79/1.97  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 1.79/1.97  Wed Jul 27 01:43:53 2022
% 1.79/1.97  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 32122.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.79/1.97  set(auto).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.79/1.97  clear(print_given).
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  formula_list(usable).
% 1.79/1.97  all A (A=A).
% 1.79/1.97  exists X (lives(X)&killed(X,agatha)).
% 1.79/1.97  lives(agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  lives(butler).
% 1.79/1.97  lives(charles).
% 1.79/1.97  all X (lives(X)->X=agatha|X=butler|X=charles).
% 1.79/1.97  all X Y (killed(X,Y)->hates(X,Y)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X Y (killed(X,Y)-> -richer(X,Y)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X (hates(agatha,X)-> -hates(charles,X)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X (X!=butler->hates(agatha,X)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X (-richer(X,agatha)->hates(butler,X)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X (hates(agatha,X)->hates(butler,X)).
% 1.79/1.97  all X exists Y (-hates(X,Y)).
% 1.79/1.97  agatha!=butler.
% 1.79/1.97  -killed(agatha,agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  end_of_list.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  list(usable).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] A=A.
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] lives($c1).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] killed($c1,agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] lives(agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] lives(butler).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] lives(charles).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -lives(X)|X=agatha|X=butler|X=charles.
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -killed(X,Y)|hates(X,Y).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -killed(X,Y)| -richer(X,Y).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -hates(agatha,X)| -hates(charles,X).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] X=butler|hates(agatha,X).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] richer(X,agatha)|hates(butler,X).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -hates(agatha,X)|hates(butler,X).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -hates(X,$f1(X)).
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] agatha!=butler.
% 1.79/1.97  0 [] -killed(agatha,agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  end_of_list.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.79/1.97  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.79/1.97  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.79/1.97  clauses in usable.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.79/1.97     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ------------> process usable:
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 1 [] -lives(A)|A=agatha|A=butler|A=charles.
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 2 [] -killed(A,B)|hates(A,B).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] -killed(A,B)| -richer(A,B).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 4 [] -hates(agatha,A)| -hates(charles,A).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] -hates(agatha,A)|hates(butler,A).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 6 [] -hates(A,$f1(A)).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 8 [copy,7,flip.1] butler!=agatha.
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 9 [] -killed(agatha,agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ------------> process sos:
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 10 [] A=A.
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 11 [] lives($c1).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] killed($c1,agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] lives(agatha).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] lives(butler).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 15 [] lives(charles).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 16 [] A=butler|hates(agatha,A).
% 1.79/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 17 [] richer(A,agatha)|hates(butler,A).
% 1.79/1.97    Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 106 [binary,104.1,8.1] $F.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 6.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.79/1.97  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.79/1.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.79/1.97  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ============ end of search ============
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.79/1.97  clauses given                 32
% 1.79/1.97  clauses generated            335
% 1.79/1.97  clauses kept                 100
% 1.79/1.97  clauses forward subsumed     281
% 1.79/1.97  clauses back subsumed         22
% 1.79/1.97  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.79/1.97  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/1.97  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/1.97  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.79/1.97  
% 1.79/1.97  Process 32122 finished Wed Jul 27 01:43:54 2022
% 1.79/1.97  Otter interrupted
% 1.79/1.97  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------