TSTP Solution File: PUZ001+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:10:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 28 22:34:09 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.14/0.38 #
% 0.14/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.38 # Number of axioms: 15 Number of unprocessed: 15
% 0.14/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.14/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.14/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 0.14/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.14/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.14/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.14/0.38 # 15 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.14/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.14/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.14/0.38 # Found 8 unit axioms.
% 0.14/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.14/0.38 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.14/0.38 # 8 unit axiom clauses
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.14/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.14/0.38 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.14/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.14/0.38 # Returning from population with 17 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.14/0.38 # We now have 17 tableaux to operate on
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (lives(agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (killed(esk1_0,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (lives(butler))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (lives(charles))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (lives(esk1_0))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (butler!=agatha)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~killed(agatha,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~hates(X1,esk2_1(X1)))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~richer(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~hates(agatha,X1)|~hates(charles,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (hates(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=butler|hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (hates(butler,X1)|~hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (richer(X1,agatha)|hates(butler,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=charles|X1=butler|X1=agatha|~lives(X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X15=X15)).
% 0.14/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (killed(esk1_0,agatha)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (killed(esk1_0,agatha)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (~richer(esk1_0,agatha)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_115, plain, (hates(butler,esk1_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_115, ...])).
% 0.14/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (lives(agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (killed(esk1_0,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (lives(butler))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (lives(charles))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (lives(esk1_0))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (butler!=agatha)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~killed(agatha,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~hates(X1,esk2_1(X1)))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~richer(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~hates(agatha,X1)|~hates(charles,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (hates(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=butler|hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (hates(butler,X1)|~hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (richer(X1,agatha)|hates(butler,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=charles|X1=butler|X1=agatha|~lives(X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X15=X15)).
% 0.14/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (butler!=agatha), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (butler!=agatha), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_111, plain, (hates(agatha,agatha)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_115, plain, (~hates(charles,agatha)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_115, ...])).
% 0.14/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.14/0.38 # Child (18894) has found a proof.
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (lives(agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (killed(esk1_0,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (lives(butler))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (lives(charles))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (lives(esk1_0))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (butler!=agatha)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~killed(agatha,agatha))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~hates(X1,esk2_1(X1)))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~richer(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~hates(agatha,X1)|~hates(charles,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (hates(X1,X2)|~killed(X1,X2))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (X1=butler|hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (hates(butler,X1)|~hates(agatha,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (richer(X1,agatha)|hates(butler,X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=charles|X1=butler|X1=agatha|~lives(X1))).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X15=X15)).
% 0.14/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.14/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # Found 7 steps
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (lives(agatha)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (lives(agatha)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_89, plain, (lives(agatha)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_90, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_117, plain, (agatha=butler), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_116, plain, (agatha=charles), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_116, ...])).
% 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_118, plain, (agatha=agatha), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_118, ...])).
% 0.14/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.14/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.14/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.14/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------