TSTP Solution File: PRO018+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : PRO018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:44:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 50.87s 18.27s
% Output   : Proof 146.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : PRO018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 03:31:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.49/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.49/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.49/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.49/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.49/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.49/0.60  
% 0.49/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.49/0.60  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.49/0.60  
% 0.49/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.49/0.60  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.49/0.60  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.49/0.60  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.49/0.60  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.49/0.60  
% 0.49/0.60  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.49/0.60  
% 0.49/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.69/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.81/1.00  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.50/1.23  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.36/5.94  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 19.67/6.02  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 20.65/6.20  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.31/8.54  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 30.62/8.59  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 31.35/8.76  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.35/8.77  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 40.36/11.55  Prover 0: stopped
% 40.61/11.75  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 40.61/11.80  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 40.61/11.83  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 50.87/18.27  Prover 3: proved (6513ms)
% 50.87/18.27  Prover 2: stopped
% 50.87/18.27  Prover 1: stopped
% 50.87/18.27  
% 50.87/18.27  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 50.87/18.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 50.87/18.27  
% 50.87/18.27  Generating proof ... found it (size 286)
% 146.07/96.13  
% 146.07/96.13  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 146.07/96.13  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 146.07/96.13  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (tptp2 = tptp1) &  ~ (tptp2 = tptp4) &  ~ (tptp2 = tptp3) &  ~ (tptp1 = tptp4) &  ~ (tptp1 = tptp3) &  ~ (tptp4 = tptp3) & activity(tptp0) & subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) & arboreal(v0) & atomic(tptp2) & atomic(tptp1) & atomic(tptp4) & atomic(tptp3) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) &  ~ leaf_occ(v0, v1) &  ~ atomic(tptp0) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v5, v3) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v4, v3) |  ~ arboreal(v5) |  ~ arboreal(v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, v2) | min_precedes(v5, v4, v2) | min_precedes(v4, v5, v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ leaf_occ(v3, v4) |  ~ leaf_occ(v2, v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v4, v5) | atomic(v5)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ root_occ(v3, v4) |  ~ root_occ(v2, v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v4, v5)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ next_subocc(v2, v3, v4) |  ~ min_precedes(v5, v3, v4) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v5, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v3, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v4) |  ~ min_precedes(v3, v5, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ root_occ(v3, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v4) |  ~ min_precedes(v5, v3, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ min_precedes(v3, v4, v5) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, v5) | min_precedes(v2, v4, v5)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ subactivity(v3, v4) |  ~ atomic(v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v4) | atocc(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ leaf(v2, v4) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, v4) | leaf_occ(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ leaf(v2, v3) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v4, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) |  ~ root(v2, v4) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, v4) | root_occ(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ root(v3, v4) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ next_subocc(v2, v3, v4) | arboreal(v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ next_subocc(v2, v3, v4) | arboreal(v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ next_subocc(v2, v3, v4) | min_precedes(v2, v3, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ earlier(v3, v4) |  ~ earlier(v2, v3) | earlier(v2, v4)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ min_precedes(v4, v2, v3) | leaf(v2, v3) |  ? [v5] : min_precedes(v2, v5, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ min_precedes(v3, v4, v2) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (subactivity(v6, v2) & subactivity(v5, v2) & atocc(v4, v6) & atocc(v3, v5))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ min_precedes(v3, v4, v2) |  ? [v5] : (subactivity_occurrence(v4, v5) & subactivity_occurrence(v3, v5) & occurrence_of(v5, v2))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, v4) | precedes(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, v4) | next_subocc(v2, v3, v4) |  ? [v5] : (min_precedes(v5, v3, v4) & min_precedes(v2, v5, v4))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ atocc(v2, v3) |  ~ legal(v2) | root(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ atocc(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] : (subactivity(v3, v4) & atomic(v4) & occurrence_of(v2, v4))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ leaf(v2, v3) | root(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] : min_precedes(v4, v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ leaf(v2, v3) | atomic(v3) |  ? [v4] : (leaf_occ(v2, v4) & occurrence_of(v4, v3))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) |  ~ arboreal(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, tptp0) | leaf_occ(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (next_subocc(v2, v4, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v5, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v4, tptp3) & min_precedes(v5, v6, tptp0) & min_precedes(v4, v5, tptp0) &  ! [v7] : (v7 = v6 | v7 = v5 |  ~ min_precedes(v4, v7, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v6, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v6, tptp1)))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) | activity_occurrence(v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) | activity_occurrence(v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ legal(v3) |  ~ earlier(v2, v3) | precedes(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root(v3, v2) |  ? [v4] : (subactivity(v4, v2) & atocc(v3, v4))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root(v2, v3) | leaf(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] : min_precedes(v2, v4, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root(v2, v3) | legal(v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ precedes(v2, v3) | legal(v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ precedes(v2, v3) | earlier(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ arboreal(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3) | atomic(v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v3, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v3, tptp1) |  ? [v4] : (occurrence_of(v4, tptp1) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v3, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) |  ? [v4] : ((occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v4, tptp1) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0)))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v3, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v3, tptp2) |  ? [v4] : (occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v3, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v3, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) |  ? [v4] : ((occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v4, tptp1) & min_precedes(v2, v4, tptp0)))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] : (leaf(v2, v4) & subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) & occurrence_of(v3, v4))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ atomic(v3) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3) | arboreal(v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root_occ(v2, v3) |  ? [v4] : (subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) & root(v2, v4) & occurrence_of(v3, v4))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v3, v2) | activity(v2)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v3, v2) | activity_occurrence(v3)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v3, v2) | atomic(v2) |  ? [v4] : (subactivity_occurrence(v4, v3) & root(v4, v2))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ earlier(v3, v2) |  ~ earlier(v2, v3)) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ activity(v2) | subactivity(v2, v2)) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ activity_occurrence(v2) |  ? [v3] : (activity(v3) & occurrence_of(v2, v3))) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ legal(v2) | arboreal(v2)))
% 146.24/96.16  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 yields:
% 146.24/96.16  | (1)  ~ (tptp2 = tptp1) &  ~ (tptp2 = tptp4) &  ~ (tptp2 = tptp3) &  ~ (tptp1 = tptp4) &  ~ (tptp1 = tptp3) &  ~ (tptp4 = tptp3) & activity(tptp0) & subactivity_occurrence(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0) & arboreal(all_0_1_1) & atomic(tptp2) & atomic(tptp1) & atomic(tptp4) & atomic(tptp3) & occurrence_of(all_0_0_0, tptp0) &  ~ leaf_occ(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0) &  ~ atomic(tptp0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v3, v1) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v1) |  ~ arboreal(v3) |  ~ arboreal(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | min_precedes(v3, v2, v0) | min_precedes(v2, v3, v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, v2) |  ~ leaf_occ(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3) | atomic(v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ root_occ(v1, v2) |  ~ root_occ(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v1, v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v1, v3, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root_occ(v1, v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v3, v1, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v3) | min_precedes(v0, v2, v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ subactivity(v1, v2) |  ~ atomic(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) | atocc(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v2) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v2) | leaf_occ(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v2, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ root(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v2) | root_occ(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ root(v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | arboreal(v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | arboreal(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | min_precedes(v0, v1, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ earlier(v1, v2) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1) | earlier(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v2, v0, v1) | leaf(v0, v1) |  ? [v3] : min_precedes(v0, v3, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (subactivity(v4, v0) & subactivity(v3, v0) & atocc(v2, v4) & atocc(v1, v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v0) |  ? [v3] : (subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) & subactivity_occurrence(v1, v3) & occurrence_of(v3, v0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) | precedes(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) | next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : (min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) & min_precedes(v0, v3, v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atocc(v0, v1) |  ~ legal(v0) | root(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atocc(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity(v1, v2) & atomic(v2) & occurrence_of(v0, v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) | root(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : min_precedes(v2, v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) | atomic(v1) |  ? [v2] : (leaf_occ(v0, v2) & occurrence_of(v2, v1))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ arboreal(v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) | leaf_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v3, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) & min_precedes(v3, v4, tptp0) & min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 | v5 = v3 |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v5, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v4, tptp1)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) | activity_occurrence(v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) | activity_occurrence(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ legal(v1) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1) | precedes(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v1, v0) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity(v2, v0) & atocc(v1, v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v0, v1) | leaf(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : min_precedes(v0, v2, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v0, v1) | legal(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ precedes(v0, v1) | legal(v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ precedes(v0, v1) | earlier(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ arboreal(v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1) | atomic(v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ? [v2] : (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) |  ? [v2] : ((occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ? [v2] : (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) |  ? [v2] : ((occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (leaf(v0, v2) & subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) & occurrence_of(v1, v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atomic(v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1) | arboreal(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) & root(v0, v2) & occurrence_of(v1, v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | activity(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | activity_occurrence(v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | atomic(v0) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity_occurrence(v2, v1) & root(v2, v0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ earlier(v1, v0) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ activity(v0) | subactivity(v0, v0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ activity_occurrence(v0) |  ? [v1] : (activity(v1) & occurrence_of(v0, v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ legal(v0) | arboreal(v0))
% 146.24/96.17  |
% 146.24/96.17  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 146.24/96.17  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (subactivity(v4, v0) & subactivity(v3, v0) & atocc(v2, v4) & atocc(v1, v3)))
% 146.24/96.17  | (3) atomic(tptp1)
% 146.24/96.17  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v0) |  ? [v3] : (subactivity_occurrence(v2, v3) & subactivity_occurrence(v1, v3) & occurrence_of(v3, v0)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (5) atomic(tptp4)
% 146.24/96.18  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v1, v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v1, v3, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ earlier(v1, v2) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1) | earlier(v0, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | arboreal(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (9)  ~ (tptp2 = tptp1)
% 146.24/96.18  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, v2) |  ~ leaf_occ(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3) | atomic(v3))
% 146.24/96.18  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) |  ? [v2] : ((occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0))))
% 146.24/96.18  | (12) occurrence_of(all_0_0_0, tptp0)
% 146.24/96.18  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (leaf(v0, v2) & subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) & occurrence_of(v1, v2)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | arboreal(v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v0, v1) | legal(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) & root(v0, v2) & occurrence_of(v1, v2)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ precedes(v0, v1) | earlier(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v1, v0) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity(v2, v0) & atocc(v1, v2)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (19)  ~ leaf_occ(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0)
% 146.24/96.18  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atomic(v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1) | arboreal(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (21)  ~ (tptp2 = tptp4)
% 146.24/96.18  | (22)  ~ (tptp2 = tptp3)
% 146.24/96.18  | (23)  ! [v0] : ( ~ activity(v0) | subactivity(v0, v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ root(v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ root(v0, v1) | leaf(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : min_precedes(v0, v2, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) | root(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : min_precedes(v2, v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (27)  ~ (tptp4 = tptp3)
% 146.24/96.18  | (28) arboreal(all_0_1_1)
% 146.24/96.18  | (29) activity(tptp0)
% 146.24/96.18  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ legal(v1) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1) | precedes(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atocc(v0, v1) |  ~ legal(v0) | root(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (32) subactivity_occurrence(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0)
% 146.24/96.18  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v3, v1) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v2, v1) |  ~ arboreal(v3) |  ~ arboreal(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | min_precedes(v3, v2, v0) | min_precedes(v2, v3, v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (34)  ~ (tptp1 = tptp3)
% 146.24/96.18  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) | min_precedes(v0, v1, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (36)  ! [v0] : ( ~ legal(v0) | arboreal(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | activity_occurrence(v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) | precedes(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (39) atomic(tptp3)
% 146.24/96.18  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) | activity_occurrence(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v2) | next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) |  ? [v3] : (min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) & min_precedes(v0, v3, v2)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | atomic(v0) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity_occurrence(v2, v1) & root(v2, v0)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ min_precedes(v1, v2, v3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, v3) | min_precedes(v0, v2, v3))
% 146.24/96.18  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ arboreal(v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1) | atomic(v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ next_subocc(v0, v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v3, v1, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (46) atomic(tptp2)
% 146.24/96.18  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ earlier(v1, v0) |  ~ earlier(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ occurrence_of(v1, v0) | activity(v0))
% 146.24/96.18  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) | activity_occurrence(v1))
% 146.24/96.18  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ? [v2] : (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ root_occ(v1, v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ min_precedes(v3, v1, v2))
% 146.24/96.18  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ atocc(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] : (subactivity(v1, v2) & atomic(v2) & occurrence_of(v0, v2)))
% 146.24/96.18  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ arboreal(v0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp0) | leaf_occ(v0, v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (next_subocc(v0, v2, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v3, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v2, tptp3) & min_precedes(v3, v4, tptp0) & min_precedes(v2, v3, tptp0) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = v4 | v5 = v3 |  ~ min_precedes(v2, v5, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v4, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v4, tptp1))))
% 146.24/96.19  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.19  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ root(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v2) | root_occ(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.19  | (56)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ subactivity(v1, v2) |  ~ atomic(v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, v2) | atocc(v0, v1))
% 146.24/96.19  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) |  ? [v2] : ((occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)) | (occurrence_of(v2, tptp1) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0))))
% 146.24/96.19  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ root_occ(v1, v2) |  ~ root_occ(v0, v2) |  ~ occurrence_of(v2, v3))
% 146.24/96.19  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v2, v1))
% 146.42/96.19  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ min_precedes(v2, v0, v1) | leaf(v0, v1) |  ? [v3] : min_precedes(v0, v3, v1))
% 146.42/96.19  | (61)  ~ atomic(tptp0)
% 146.42/96.19  | (62)  ~ (tptp1 = tptp4)
% 146.42/96.19  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v1) | atomic(v1) |  ? [v2] : (leaf_occ(v0, v2) & occurrence_of(v2, v1)))
% 146.42/96.19  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ precedes(v0, v1) | legal(v1))
% 146.42/96.19  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ leaf(v0, v2) |  ~ subactivity_occurrence(v0, v1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, v2) | leaf_occ(v0, v1))
% 146.42/96.19  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) |  ~ leaf_occ(v1, all_0_0_0) |  ~ occurrence_of(v1, tptp1) |  ~ occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) | occurrence_of(v1, tptp2) |  ? [v2] : (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) & min_precedes(v0, v2, tptp0)))
% 146.42/96.19  | (67)  ! [v0] : ( ~ activity_occurrence(v0) |  ? [v1] : (activity(v1) & occurrence_of(v0, v1)))
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  | Instantiating formula (53) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms subactivity_occurrence(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0), arboreal(all_0_1_1), occurrence_of(all_0_0_0, tptp0),  ~ leaf_occ(all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (next_subocc(all_0_1_1, v0, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) & min_precedes(v1, v2, tptp0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) &  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v2, tptp1)))
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  | Instantiating (68) with all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 yields:
% 146.42/96.19  | (69) next_subocc(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_15_0_3 | v0 = all_15_1_4 |  ~ min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(all_15_0_3, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_15_0_3, tptp1))
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  | Applying alpha-rule on (69) yields:
% 146.42/96.19  | (70) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.19  | (71) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.19  | (72) occurrence_of(all_15_0_3, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_15_0_3, tptp1)
% 146.42/96.19  | (73) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.19  | (74) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.19  | (75)  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_15_0_3 | v0 = all_15_1_4 |  ~ min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.19  | (76) next_subocc(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  | Instantiating formula (54) with tptp3, tptp4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  | (77) tptp4 = tptp3 |  ~ occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (77), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.19  |-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.19  | (78)  ~ occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.19  |
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (35) with tptp0, all_15_2_5, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (79) min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (20) with tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms atomic(tptp4), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (80) arboreal(all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (48) with all_15_1_4, tptp4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (81) activity(tptp4)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (37) with all_15_1_4, tptp4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (82) activity_occurrence(all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (20) with tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms atomic(tptp3), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (83) arboreal(all_15_2_5)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (48) with all_15_2_5, tptp3 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (84) activity(tptp3)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (37) with all_15_2_5, tptp3 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (85) activity_occurrence(all_15_2_5)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (86)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (subactivity(v1, tptp0) & subactivity(v0, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_0_3, v1) & atocc(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (87)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(all_15_0_3, v0) & subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, v0) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (38) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (88) precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3)
% 146.42/96.19  	|
% 146.42/96.19  	| Instantiating formula (41) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.19  	| (89) next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0) |  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (90) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (91)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (subactivity(v1, tptp0) & subactivity(v0, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_1_4, v1) & atocc(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (92)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, v0) & subactivity_occurrence(all_15_2_5, v0) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (38) with tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (93) precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (41) with tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (94) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0) |  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating (86) with all_46_0_7, all_46_1_8 yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (95) subactivity(all_46_0_7, tptp0) & subactivity(all_46_1_8, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_0_3, all_46_0_7) & atocc(all_15_1_4, all_46_1_8)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (96) subactivity(all_46_0_7, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (97) subactivity(all_46_1_8, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (98) atocc(all_15_0_3, all_46_0_7)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (99) atocc(all_15_1_4, all_46_1_8)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating (92) with all_48_0_9 yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (100) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, all_48_0_9) & subactivity_occurrence(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9) & occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Applying alpha-rule on (100) yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (101) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (102) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (103) occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating (91) with all_50_0_10, all_50_1_11 yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (104) subactivity(all_50_0_10, tptp0) & subactivity(all_50_1_11, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_1_4, all_50_0_10) & atocc(all_15_2_5, all_50_1_11)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Applying alpha-rule on (104) yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (105) subactivity(all_50_0_10, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (106) subactivity(all_50_1_11, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (107) atocc(all_15_1_4, all_50_0_10)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (108) atocc(all_15_2_5, all_50_1_11)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating (87) with all_52_0_12 yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (109) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_0_3, all_52_0_12) & subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12) & occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Applying alpha-rule on (109) yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (110) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_0_3, all_52_0_12)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (111) subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12)
% 146.42/96.20  	| (112) occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (23) with tptp4 and discharging atoms activity(tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (113) subactivity(tptp4, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (23) with tptp3 and discharging atoms activity(tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (114) subactivity(tptp3, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms activity_occurrence(all_15_1_4), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (115)  ? [v0] : (activity(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms activity_occurrence(all_15_2_5), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (116)  ? [v0] : (activity(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_50_0_10, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_1_4, all_50_0_10), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (117)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_50_0_10, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_46_1_8, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_1_4, all_46_1_8), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (118)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_46_1_8, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_50_1_11, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_2_5, all_50_1_11), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (119)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_50_1_11, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (17) with all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (120) earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (64) with all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (121) legal(all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (53) with all_52_0_12, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms subactivity_occurrence(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12), arboreal(all_15_1_4), occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (122) leaf_occ(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (next_subocc(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) & min_precedes(v1, v2, tptp0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) &  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v2, tptp1)))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (53) with all_48_0_9, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms subactivity_occurrence(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9), arboreal(all_15_2_5), occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (123) leaf_occ(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (next_subocc(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) & min_precedes(v1, v2, tptp0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) &  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v2, tptp1)))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (37) with all_52_0_12, tptp0 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (124) activity_occurrence(all_52_0_12)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (42) with all_52_0_12, tptp0 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0),  ~ atomic(tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (125)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(v0, all_52_0_12) & root(v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (37) with all_48_0_9, tptp0 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (126) activity_occurrence(all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (42) with all_48_0_9, tptp0 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0),  ~ atomic(tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (127)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(v0, all_48_0_9) & root(v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (128)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (subactivity(v1, tptp0) & subactivity(v0, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_0_3, v1) & atocc(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (41) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (129) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0) |  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (130) min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (131) min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.20  	|
% 146.42/96.20  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_15_2_5, all_0_1_1, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_2_5, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.20  	| (132)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (subactivity(v1, tptp0) & subactivity(v0, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_2_5, v1) & atocc(all_0_1_1, v0))
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (128) with all_84_0_17, all_84_1_18 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (133) subactivity(all_84_0_17, tptp0) & subactivity(all_84_1_18, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_0_3, all_84_0_17) & atocc(all_15_2_5, all_84_1_18)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (133) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (134) subactivity(all_84_0_17, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (135) subactivity(all_84_1_18, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (136) atocc(all_15_0_3, all_84_0_17)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (137) atocc(all_15_2_5, all_84_1_18)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (125) with all_86_0_19 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (138) subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12) & root(all_86_0_19, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (138) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (139) subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (140) root(all_86_0_19, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (117) with all_88_0_20 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (141) subactivity(all_50_0_10, all_88_0_20) & atomic(all_88_0_20) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_88_0_20)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (141) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (142) subactivity(all_50_0_10, all_88_0_20)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (143) atomic(all_88_0_20)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (144) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_88_0_20)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (116) with all_96_0_24 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (145) activity(all_96_0_24) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_96_0_24)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (145) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (146) activity(all_96_0_24)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (147) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_96_0_24)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (115) with all_98_0_25 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (148) activity(all_98_0_25) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_98_0_25)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (148) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (149) activity(all_98_0_25)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (150) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_98_0_25)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (119) with all_100_0_26 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (151) subactivity(all_50_1_11, all_100_0_26) & atomic(all_100_0_26) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_100_0_26)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (151) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (152) subactivity(all_50_1_11, all_100_0_26)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (153) atomic(all_100_0_26)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (154) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_100_0_26)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (118) with all_102_0_27 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (155) subactivity(all_46_1_8, all_102_0_27) & atomic(all_102_0_27) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_102_0_27)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (155) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (156) subactivity(all_46_1_8, all_102_0_27)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (157) atomic(all_102_0_27)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (158) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_102_0_27)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (132) with all_106_0_29, all_106_1_30 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (159) subactivity(all_106_0_29, tptp0) & subactivity(all_106_1_30, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_2_5, all_106_0_29) & atocc(all_0_1_1, all_106_1_30)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (159) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (160) subactivity(all_106_0_29, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (161) subactivity(all_106_1_30, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (162) atocc(all_15_2_5, all_106_0_29)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (163) atocc(all_0_1_1, all_106_1_30)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating (127) with all_108_0_31 yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (164) subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9) & root(all_108_0_31, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (164) yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (165) subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.21  	| (166) root(all_108_0_31, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_102_0_27, tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_102_0_27), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (167) all_102_0_27 = tptp4
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_98_0_25, all_102_0_27, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_102_0_27), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_98_0_25), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (168) all_102_0_27 = all_98_0_25
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_88_0_20, all_102_0_27, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_102_0_27), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_88_0_20), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (169) all_102_0_27 = all_88_0_20
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_100_0_26, tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_100_0_26), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (170) all_100_0_26 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_96_0_24, all_100_0_26, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_100_0_26), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_96_0_24), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (171) all_100_0_26 = all_96_0_24
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Combining equations (169,168) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (172) all_98_0_25 = all_88_0_20
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Combining equations (167,168) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (173) all_98_0_25 = tptp4
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Combining equations (170,171) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (174) all_96_0_24 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Combining equations (173,172) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (175) all_88_0_20 = tptp4
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Combining equations (174,171) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (170) all_100_0_26 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| From (170) and (153) follows:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (39) atomic(tptp3)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| From (175) and (143) follows:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (5) atomic(tptp4)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| From (175) and (144) follows:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (74) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| From (174) and (147) follows:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (71) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_52_0_12 and discharging atoms activity_occurrence(all_52_0_12), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (181)  ? [v0] : (activity(v0) & occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, v0))
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_48_0_9 and discharging atoms activity_occurrence(all_48_0_9), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (182)  ? [v0] : (activity(v0) & occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, v0))
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (56) with tptp4, tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms subactivity(tptp4, tptp4), atomic(tptp4), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (183) atocc(all_15_1_4, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (56) with tptp3, tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms subactivity(tptp3, tptp3), atomic(tptp3), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (184) atocc(all_15_2_5, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.21  	|
% 146.42/96.21  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_106_0_29, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_2_5, all_106_0_29), yields:
% 146.42/96.21  	| (185)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_106_0_29, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_84_1_18, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_2_5, all_84_1_18), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (186)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_84_1_18, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (55) with tptp0, all_48_0_9, all_108_0_31 and discharging atoms subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9), root(all_108_0_31, tptp0), occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (187) root_occ(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (55) with tptp0, all_52_0_12, all_86_0_19 and discharging atoms subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12), root(all_86_0_19, tptp0), occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (188) root_occ(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (30) with all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms legal(all_15_1_4), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (189)  ~ earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4) | precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (60) with all_0_1_1, tptp0, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (190) leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0) |  ? [v0] : min_precedes(all_15_0_3, v0, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (60) with all_0_1_1, tptp0, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (191) leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0) |  ? [v0] : min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_15_1_4, all_0_1_1, tptp0 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_0_1_1, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (192)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (subactivity(v1, tptp0) & subactivity(v0, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_1_4, v1) & atocc(all_0_1_1, v0))
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating (192) with all_146_0_35, all_146_1_36 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (193) subactivity(all_146_0_35, tptp0) & subactivity(all_146_1_36, tptp0) & atocc(all_15_1_4, all_146_0_35) & atocc(all_0_1_1, all_146_1_36)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (193) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (194) subactivity(all_146_0_35, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (195) subactivity(all_146_1_36, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (196) atocc(all_15_1_4, all_146_0_35)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (197) atocc(all_0_1_1, all_146_1_36)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating (182) with all_148_0_37 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (198) activity(all_148_0_37) & occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_148_0_37)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (198) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (199) activity(all_148_0_37)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (200) occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_148_0_37)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating (186) with all_158_0_42 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (201) subactivity(all_84_1_18, all_158_0_42) & atomic(all_158_0_42) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_158_0_42)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (201) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (202) subactivity(all_84_1_18, all_158_0_42)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (203) atomic(all_158_0_42)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (204) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_158_0_42)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating (181) with all_160_0_43 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (205) activity(all_160_0_43) & occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_160_0_43)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (205) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (206) activity(all_160_0_43)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (207) occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_160_0_43)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating (185) with all_162_0_44 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (208) subactivity(all_106_0_29, all_162_0_44) & atomic(all_162_0_44) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_162_0_44)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Applying alpha-rule on (208) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (209) subactivity(all_106_0_29, all_162_0_44)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (210) atomic(all_162_0_44)
% 146.42/96.22  	| (211) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_162_0_44)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_160_0_43, tptp0, all_52_0_12 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_160_0_43), occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (212) all_160_0_43 = tptp0
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_148_0_37, tptp0, all_48_0_9 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_148_0_37), occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (213) all_148_0_37 = tptp0
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_162_0_44, tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_162_0_44), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (214) all_162_0_44 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Instantiating formula (54) with all_158_0_42, all_162_0_44, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_162_0_44), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_158_0_42), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (215) all_162_0_44 = all_158_0_42
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| Combining equations (214,215) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (216) all_158_0_42 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| From (212) and (207) follows:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (112) occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| From (213) and (200) follows:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (103) occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	| From (216) and (204) follows:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (71) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.22  	|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.22  	| (220) leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  	|
% 146.42/96.22  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (89), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.22  		|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.22  		| (221) next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  		|
% 146.42/96.22  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.22  			|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.22  			| (222) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  			|
% 146.42/96.22  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.22  				|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.22  				| (223) leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  				|
% 146.42/96.22  					| Instantiating formula (59) with all_15_0_3, tptp0, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  					| (224) $false
% 146.42/96.22  					|
% 146.42/96.22  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.42/96.22  				|-Branch two:
% 146.42/96.22  				| (225)  ~ leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  				| (226)  ? [v0] : min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  				|
% 146.42/96.22  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.22  					|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.22  					| (223) leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  					|
% 146.42/96.22  						| Using (223) and (225) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  						| (224) $false
% 146.42/96.22  						|
% 146.42/96.22  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.42/96.22  					|-Branch two:
% 146.42/96.22  					| (225)  ~ leaf(all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  					| (226)  ? [v0] : min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  					|
% 146.42/96.22  						| Instantiating (226) with all_248_0_5487 yields:
% 146.42/96.22  						| (231) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_248_0_5487, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  						|
% 146.42/96.22  						| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.22  						| (232)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.22  						|
% 146.42/96.22  						| Using (231) and (232) yields:
% 146.42/96.22  						| (233)  ~ (all_248_0_5487 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (52) with all_146_0_35, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_1_4, all_146_0_35), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (234)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(all_146_0_35, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (52) with tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (235)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(tptp4, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, v0))
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (52) with tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms atocc(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (236)  ? [v0] : (subactivity(tptp3, v0) & atomic(v0) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, v0))
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (16) with all_48_0_9, all_108_0_31 and discharging atoms root_occ(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (237)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9) & root(all_108_0_31, v0) & occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, v0))
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_248_0_5487, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_248_0_5487, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (238) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_248_0_5487, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating (236) with all_288_0_5493 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (239) subactivity(tptp3, all_288_0_5493) & atomic(all_288_0_5493) & occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_288_0_5493)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Applying alpha-rule on (239) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (240) subactivity(tptp3, all_288_0_5493)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (241) atomic(all_288_0_5493)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (242) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_288_0_5493)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating (234) with all_314_0_5506 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (243) subactivity(all_146_0_35, all_314_0_5506) & atomic(all_314_0_5506) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_314_0_5506)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Applying alpha-rule on (243) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (244) subactivity(all_146_0_35, all_314_0_5506)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (245) atomic(all_314_0_5506)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (246) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_314_0_5506)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating (235) with all_316_0_5507 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (247) subactivity(tptp4, all_316_0_5507) & atomic(all_316_0_5507) & occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_316_0_5507)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Applying alpha-rule on (247) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (248) subactivity(tptp4, all_316_0_5507)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (249) atomic(all_316_0_5507)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (250) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_316_0_5507)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating (237) with all_342_0_5523 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (251) subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9) & root(all_108_0_31, all_342_0_5523) & occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_342_0_5523)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Applying alpha-rule on (251) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (165) subactivity_occurrence(all_108_0_31, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (253) root(all_108_0_31, all_342_0_5523)
% 146.42/96.23  						| (254) occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_342_0_5523)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (54) with all_342_0_5523, tptp0, all_48_0_9 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, all_342_0_5523), occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (255) all_342_0_5523 = tptp0
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (54) with all_316_0_5507, tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_316_0_5507), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (256) all_316_0_5507 = tptp4
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (54) with all_314_0_5506, all_316_0_5507, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_316_0_5507), occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, all_314_0_5506), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (257) all_316_0_5507 = all_314_0_5506
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (54) with all_288_0_5493, tptp3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, all_288_0_5493), occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp3), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (258) all_288_0_5493 = tptp3
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Using (242) and (78) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (259)  ~ (all_288_0_5493 = tptp4)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (45) with all_248_0_5487, tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_248_0_5487, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (260)  ~ min_precedes(all_248_0_5487, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Instantiating formula (75) with all_248_0_5487 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_248_0_5487, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (261) all_248_0_5487 = all_15_0_3 | all_248_0_5487 = all_15_1_4
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Combining equations (256,257) yields a new equation:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (262) all_314_0_5506 = tptp4
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Equations (258) can reduce 259 to:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (263)  ~ (tptp4 = tptp3)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| Simplifying 263 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (27)  ~ (tptp4 = tptp3)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| From (255) and (254) follows:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (103) occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						| From (262) and (246) follows:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (74) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.23  						|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.23  						| (267) all_248_0_5487 = all_15_0_3
% 146.42/96.23  						|
% 146.42/96.23  							| From (267) and (231) follows:
% 146.42/96.23  							| (70) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  							|
% 146.42/96.23  							| From (267) and (260) follows:
% 146.42/96.23  							| (269)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  							|
% 146.42/96.23  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (129), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.23  							|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.23  							| (270) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  							|
% 146.42/96.23  								| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  								| (224) $false
% 146.42/96.23  								|
% 146.42/96.23  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.42/96.23  							|-Branch two:
% 146.42/96.23  							| (272)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  							| (273)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.23  							|
% 146.42/96.23  								| Instantiating (273) with all_442_0_5527 yields:
% 146.42/96.23  								| (274) min_precedes(all_442_0_5527, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_442_0_5527, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  								|
% 146.42/96.23  								| Applying alpha-rule on (274) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  								| (275) min_precedes(all_442_0_5527, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  								| (276) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_442_0_5527, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.23  								|
% 146.42/96.23  								| Using (275) and (269) yields:
% 146.42/96.23  								| (277)  ~ (all_442_0_5527 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.42/96.23  								|
% 146.42/96.23  								| Instantiating formula (75) with all_442_0_5527 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_442_0_5527, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.23  								| (278) all_442_0_5527 = all_15_0_3 | all_442_0_5527 = all_15_1_4
% 146.42/96.24  								|
% 146.42/96.24  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.24  								|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.24  								| (279) all_442_0_5527 = all_15_0_3
% 146.42/96.24  								|
% 146.42/96.24  									| Equations (279) can reduce 277 to:
% 146.42/96.24  									| (280) $false
% 146.42/96.24  									|
% 146.42/96.24  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.42/96.24  								|-Branch two:
% 146.42/96.24  								| (277)  ~ (all_442_0_5527 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.42/96.24  								| (282) all_442_0_5527 = all_15_1_4
% 146.42/96.24  								|
% 146.42/96.24  									| From (282) and (275) follows:
% 146.42/96.24  									| (70) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  									|
% 146.42/96.24  									| From (282) and (276) follows:
% 146.42/96.24  									| (73) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  									|
% 146.42/96.24  									| Instantiating formula (54) with tptp3, tptp4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp4), yields:
% 146.42/96.24  									| (285) tptp4 = tptp3 |  ~ occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.24  									|
% 146.42/96.24  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.24  									|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.24  									| (286)  ~ occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.24  									|
% 146.42/96.24  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 146.42/96.24  										|-Branch one:
% 146.42/96.24  										| (287) leaf_occ(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.24  										|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Instantiating formula (6) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9 and discharging atoms leaf_occ(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9), occurrence_of(all_48_0_9, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (224) $false
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.42/96.24  										|-Branch two:
% 146.42/96.24  										| (289)  ~ leaf_occ(all_15_2_5, all_48_0_9)
% 146.42/96.24  										| (290)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (next_subocc(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) & min_precedes(v1, v2, tptp0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) &  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v2, tptp1)))
% 146.42/96.24  										|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Instantiating (290) with all_591_0_5532, all_591_1_5533, all_591_2_5534 yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (291) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_591_2_5534, tptp0) & occurrence_of(all_591_1_5533, tptp4) & occurrence_of(all_591_2_5534, tptp3) & min_precedes(all_591_1_5533, all_591_0_5532, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_591_2_5534, all_591_1_5533, tptp0) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_591_0_5532 | v0 = all_591_1_5533 |  ~ min_precedes(all_591_2_5534, v0, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(all_591_0_5532, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_591_0_5532, tptp1))
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Applying alpha-rule on (291) yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (292) occurrence_of(all_591_0_5532, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_591_0_5532, tptp1)
% 146.42/96.24  											| (293) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_591_2_5534, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  											| (294) occurrence_of(all_591_1_5533, tptp4)
% 146.42/96.24  											| (295) min_precedes(all_591_1_5533, all_591_0_5532, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  											| (296)  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_591_0_5532 | v0 = all_591_1_5533 |  ~ min_precedes(all_591_2_5534, v0, tptp0))
% 146.42/96.24  											| (297) min_precedes(all_591_2_5534, all_591_1_5533, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  											| (298) occurrence_of(all_591_2_5534, tptp3)
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (272)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Using (293) and (272) yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (300)  ~ (all_591_2_5534 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Using (298) and (286) yields:
% 146.42/96.24  											| (301)  ~ (all_591_2_5534 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.42/96.24  											|
% 146.42/96.24  											| Instantiating formula (35) with tptp0, all_591_2_5534, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_591_2_5534, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.24  											| (302) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_591_2_5534, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.24  											|
% 146.68/96.24  											| Instantiating formula (75) with all_591_2_5534 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_591_2_5534, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.24  											| (303) all_591_2_5534 = all_15_0_3 | all_591_2_5534 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.24  											|
% 146.68/96.24  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (303), into two cases.
% 146.68/96.24  											|-Branch one:
% 146.68/96.24  											| (304) all_591_2_5534 = all_15_0_3
% 146.68/96.24  											|
% 146.68/96.24  												| Equations (304) can reduce 300 to:
% 146.68/96.24  												| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.24  												|
% 146.68/96.24  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.24  											|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.24  											| (300)  ~ (all_591_2_5534 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.68/96.24  											| (307) all_591_2_5534 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.24  											|
% 146.68/96.24  												| Equations (307) can reduce 301 to:
% 146.68/96.24  												| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.24  												|
% 146.68/96.24  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.24  									|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.24  									| (309) occurrence_of(all_15_1_4, tptp3)
% 146.68/96.24  									| (310) tptp4 = tptp3
% 146.68/96.24  									|
% 146.68/96.24  										| Equations (310) can reduce 27 to:
% 146.68/96.24  										| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.24  										|
% 146.68/96.24  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.24  						|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.24  						| (312)  ~ (all_248_0_5487 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.68/96.24  						| (313) all_248_0_5487 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.24  						|
% 146.68/96.24  							| Equations (313) can reduce 233 to:
% 146.68/96.24  							| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.24  							|
% 146.68/96.24  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.24  			|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.24  			| (315)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.24  			| (316)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.68/96.24  			|
% 146.68/96.24  				| Instantiating (316) with all_236_0_5927 yields:
% 146.68/96.24  				| (317) min_precedes(all_236_0_5927, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_236_0_5927, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.24  				|
% 146.68/96.24  				| Applying alpha-rule on (317) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (318) min_precedes(all_236_0_5927, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				| (319) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_236_0_5927, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (232)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (321)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (75) with all_236_0_5927 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_236_0_5927, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (322) all_236_0_5927 = all_15_0_3 | all_236_0_5927 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Using (318) and (321) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (323)  ~ (all_236_0_5927 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Using (318) and (232) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (324)  ~ (all_236_0_5927 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 146.68/96.25  				|-Branch one:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (325) all_236_0_5927 = all_15_0_3
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  					| Equations (325) can reduce 323 to:
% 146.68/96.25  					| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.25  					|
% 146.68/96.25  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.25  				|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (323)  ~ (all_236_0_5927 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.68/96.25  				| (328) all_236_0_5927 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  					| Equations (328) can reduce 324 to:
% 146.68/96.25  					| (280) $false
% 146.68/96.25  					|
% 146.68/96.25  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.68/96.25  		|-Branch two:
% 146.68/96.25  		| (330)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  		| (331)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0))
% 146.68/96.25  		|
% 146.68/96.25  			| Instantiating (331) with all_230_0_5928 yields:
% 146.68/96.25  			| (332) min_precedes(all_230_0_5928, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_230_0_5928, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  			|
% 146.68/96.25  			| Applying alpha-rule on (332) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  			| (333) min_precedes(all_230_0_5928, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  			| (334) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_230_0_5928, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  			|
% 146.68/96.25  			| Instantiating formula (59) with all_15_0_3, tptp0, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  			| (269)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  			|
% 146.68/96.25  			| Using (333) and (269) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  			| (336)  ~ (all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.68/96.25  			|
% 146.68/96.25  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 146.68/96.25  			|-Branch one:
% 146.68/96.25  			| (222) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  			|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (232)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Using (334) and (232) yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (339)  ~ (all_230_0_5928 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_230_0_5928, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_230_0_5928, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (340) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_230_0_5928, tptp0)
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (75) with all_230_0_5928 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_230_0_5928, tptp0), yields:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (341) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3 | all_230_0_5928 = all_15_1_4
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.68/96.25  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (341), into two cases.
% 146.68/96.25  				|-Branch one:
% 146.68/96.25  				| (342) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3
% 146.68/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  					| Equations (342) can reduce 336 to:
% 146.73/96.25  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.25  					|
% 146.73/96.25  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.25  				|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (336)  ~ (all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.25  				| (345) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  					| Equations (345) can reduce 339 to:
% 146.73/96.25  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.25  					|
% 146.73/96.25  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.25  			|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.25  			| (315)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  			| (316)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.73/96.25  			|
% 146.73/96.25  				| Instantiating (316) with all_246_0_5977 yields:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (349) min_precedes(all_246_0_5977, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_246_0_5977, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  				| Applying alpha-rule on (349) yields:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (350) min_precedes(all_246_0_5977, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  				| (351) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_246_0_5977, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (59) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (321)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  				| Instantiating formula (75) with all_246_0_5977 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_246_0_5977, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (353) all_246_0_5977 = all_15_0_3 | all_246_0_5977 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  				| Using (350) and (321) yields:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (354)  ~ (all_246_0_5977 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (353), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.25  				|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (355) all_246_0_5977 = all_15_0_3
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  					| Equations (355) can reduce 354 to:
% 146.73/96.25  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.25  					|
% 146.73/96.25  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.25  				|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.25  				| (354)  ~ (all_246_0_5977 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.25  				| (358) all_246_0_5977 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.25  				|
% 146.73/96.25  					| From (358) and (351) follows:
% 146.73/96.25  					| (73) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.25  					|
% 146.73/96.25  					| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_12, all_86_0_19 and discharging atoms root_occ(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (360)  ? [v0] : (subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12) & root(all_86_0_19, v0) & occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, v0))
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_230_0_5928, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_230_0_5928, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (340) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_230_0_5928, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating (360) with all_376_0_6025 yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (362) subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12) & root(all_86_0_19, all_376_0_6025) & occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_376_0_6025)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Applying alpha-rule on (362) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (139) subactivity_occurrence(all_86_0_19, all_52_0_12)
% 146.73/96.26  					| (364) root(all_86_0_19, all_376_0_6025)
% 146.73/96.26  					| (365) occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_376_0_6025)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating formula (54) with all_376_0_6025, tptp0, all_52_0_12 and discharging atoms occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, all_376_0_6025), occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (366) all_376_0_6025 = tptp0
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating formula (75) with all_230_0_5928 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_230_0_5928, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (341) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3 | all_230_0_5928 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| From (366) and (365) follows:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (112) occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (341), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  					|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (342) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  						| Equations (342) can reduce 336 to:
% 146.73/96.26  						| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.26  						|
% 146.73/96.26  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.26  					|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (336)  ~ (all_230_0_5928 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  					| (345) all_230_0_5928 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  						| From (345) and (334) follows:
% 146.73/96.26  						| (373) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  						|
% 146.73/96.26  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (122), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  						|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  						| (374) leaf_occ(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12)
% 146.73/96.26  						|
% 146.73/96.26  							| Instantiating formula (6) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12 and discharging atoms leaf_occ(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12), occurrence_of(all_52_0_12, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  							| (224) $false
% 146.73/96.26  							|
% 146.73/96.26  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.26  						|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.26  						| (376)  ~ leaf_occ(all_15_1_4, all_52_0_12)
% 146.73/96.26  						| (377)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (next_subocc(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0) & occurrence_of(v1, tptp4) & occurrence_of(v0, tptp3) & min_precedes(v1, v2, tptp0) & min_precedes(v0, v1, tptp0) &  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v3 = v1 |  ~ min_precedes(v0, v3, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(v2, tptp2) | occurrence_of(v2, tptp1)))
% 146.73/96.26  						|
% 146.73/96.26  							| Instantiating (377) with all_518_0_6033, all_518_1_6034, all_518_2_6035 yields:
% 146.73/96.26  							| (378) next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0) & occurrence_of(all_518_1_6034, tptp4) & occurrence_of(all_518_2_6035, tptp3) & min_precedes(all_518_1_6034, all_518_0_6033, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_518_2_6035, all_518_1_6034, tptp0) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_518_0_6033 | v0 = all_518_1_6034 |  ~ min_precedes(all_518_2_6035, v0, tptp0)) & (occurrence_of(all_518_0_6033, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_518_0_6033, tptp1))
% 146.73/96.26  							|
% 146.73/96.26  							| Applying alpha-rule on (378) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  							| (379) min_precedes(all_518_1_6034, all_518_0_6033, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  							| (380)  ! [v0] : (v0 = all_518_0_6033 | v0 = all_518_1_6034 |  ~ min_precedes(all_518_2_6035, v0, tptp0))
% 146.73/96.26  							| (381) next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  							| (382) min_precedes(all_518_2_6035, all_518_1_6034, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  							| (383) occurrence_of(all_518_1_6034, tptp4)
% 146.73/96.26  							| (384) occurrence_of(all_518_0_6033, tptp2) | occurrence_of(all_518_0_6033, tptp1)
% 146.73/96.26  							| (385) occurrence_of(all_518_2_6035, tptp3)
% 146.73/96.26  							|
% 146.73/96.26  							| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_518_2_6035, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  							| (386)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  							|
% 146.73/96.26  							| Instantiating formula (35) with tptp0, all_518_2_6035, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0),  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_518_2_6035, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  							| (224) $false
% 146.73/96.26  							|
% 146.73/96.26  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.26  	|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.26  	| (388)  ~ leaf(all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  	| (389)  ? [v0] : min_precedes(all_15_0_3, v0, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  	|
% 146.73/96.26  		| Instantiating (389) with all_224_0_6060 yields:
% 146.73/96.26  		| (390) min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_224_0_6060, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  		|
% 146.73/96.26  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  		|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  		| (222) next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  		|
% 146.73/96.26  			| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_0_3, tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  			| (321)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  			|
% 146.73/96.26  			| Using (390) and (321) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  			| (393)  ~ (all_224_0_6060 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.26  			|
% 146.73/96.26  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (89), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  			|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  			| (221) next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  			|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_0_3, tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (269)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Using (390) and (269) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (396)  ~ (all_224_0_6060 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_224_0_6060, all_15_0_3, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_0_3, all_224_0_6060, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (397) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_224_0_6060, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (75) with all_224_0_6060 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_224_0_6060, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (398) all_224_0_6060 = all_15_0_3 | all_224_0_6060 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (398), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  				|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (399) all_224_0_6060 = all_15_0_3
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Equations (399) can reduce 396 to:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.26  				|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (396)  ~ (all_224_0_6060 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  				| (402) all_224_0_6060 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Equations (402) can reduce 393 to:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.26  			|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.26  			| (330)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  			| (331)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, v0, tptp0))
% 146.73/96.26  			|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating (331) with all_265_0_6111 yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (406) min_precedes(all_265_0_6111, all_15_0_3, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_265_0_6111, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Applying alpha-rule on (406) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (407) min_precedes(all_265_0_6111, all_15_0_3, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				| (408) min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_265_0_6111, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (45) with all_15_1_4, tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (232)  ~ min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Using (408) and (232) yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (410)  ~ (all_265_0_6111 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (38) with tptp0, all_15_0_3, all_265_0_6111 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_265_0_6111, all_15_0_3, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (411) precedes(all_265_0_6111, all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (43) with tptp0, all_265_0_6111, all_15_1_4, all_15_2_5 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_1_4, all_265_0_6111, tptp0), min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (412) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_265_0_6111, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				| Instantiating formula (75) with all_265_0_6111 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_265_0_6111, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (413) all_265_0_6111 = all_15_0_3 | all_265_0_6111 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.26  				|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.26  				| (414) all_265_0_6111 = all_15_0_3
% 146.73/96.26  				|
% 146.73/96.26  					| From (414) and (411) follows:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (415) precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating formula (17) with all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms precedes(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (416) earlier(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.26  					| Instantiating formula (47) with all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3 and discharging atoms earlier(all_15_0_3, all_15_0_3), yields:
% 146.73/96.26  					| (224) $false
% 146.73/96.26  					|
% 146.73/96.27  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  				|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (418)  ~ (all_265_0_6111 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.27  				| (419) all_265_0_6111 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  					| Equations (419) can reduce 410 to:
% 146.73/96.27  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.27  					|
% 146.73/96.27  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  		|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.27  		| (315)  ~ next_subocc(all_15_2_5, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.27  		| (316)  ? [v0] : (min_precedes(v0, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, v0, tptp0))
% 146.73/96.27  		|
% 146.73/96.27  			| Instantiating (316) with all_251_0_6909 yields:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (423) min_precedes(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4, tptp0) & min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_251_0_6909, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  			| Applying alpha-rule on (423) yields:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (424) min_precedes(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.27  			| (425) min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_251_0_6909, tptp0)
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  			| Instantiating formula (75) with all_251_0_6909 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_15_2_5, all_251_0_6909, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (426) all_251_0_6909 = all_15_0_3 | all_251_0_6909 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  			| Instantiating formula (38) with tptp0, all_15_1_4, all_251_0_6909 and discharging atoms min_precedes(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4, tptp0), yields:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (427) precedes(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.27  			|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (428)  ~ earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  				| Instantiating formula (17) with all_15_1_4, all_251_0_6909 and discharging atoms precedes(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4), yields:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (429) earlier(all_251_0_6909, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  				| Instantiating formula (47) with all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_0_3), yields:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (430)  ~ earlier(all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  				| Using (429) and (428) yields:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (431)  ~ (all_251_0_6909 = all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (426), into two cases.
% 146.73/96.27  				|-Branch one:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (432) all_251_0_6909 = all_15_0_3
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  					| From (432) and (429) follows:
% 146.73/96.27  					| (433) earlier(all_15_0_3, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  					|
% 146.73/96.27  					| Using (433) and (430) yields:
% 146.73/96.27  					| (224) $false
% 146.73/96.27  					|
% 146.73/96.27  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  				|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (435)  ~ (all_251_0_6909 = all_15_0_3)
% 146.73/96.27  				| (436) all_251_0_6909 = all_15_1_4
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  					| Equations (436) can reduce 431 to:
% 146.73/96.27  					| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.27  					|
% 146.73/96.27  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  			|-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.27  			| (438) earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  			| (439) precedes(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4)
% 146.73/96.27  			|
% 146.73/96.27  				| Instantiating formula (47) with all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4 and discharging atoms earlier(all_15_1_4, all_15_1_4), yields:
% 146.73/96.27  				| (224) $false
% 146.73/96.27  				|
% 146.73/96.27  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  |-Branch two:
% 146.73/96.27  | (441) occurrence_of(all_15_2_5, tptp4)
% 146.73/96.27  | (310) tptp4 = tptp3
% 146.73/96.27  |
% 146.73/96.27  	| Equations (310) can reduce 27 to:
% 146.73/96.27  	| (280) $false
% 146.73/96.27  	|
% 146.73/96.27  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 146.73/96.27  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 146.73/96.27  
% 146.73/96.27  95659ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------