TSTP Solution File: PLA031-1.003 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : PLA031-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:32:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 58.55s 58.77s
% Output : Refutation 58.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : PLA031-1.003 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Tue May 31 20:41:44 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.30 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.09/0.30 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.09/0.30 Tue May 31 20:41:44 2022
% 0.09/0.30 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21391.
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.09/0.30 set(auto).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.09/0.30 clear(print_given).
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 list(usable).
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.09/0.30 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.09/0.30 in usable.
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.09/0.30 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 ------------> process usable:
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 ------------> process sos:
% 0.09/0.30
% 0.09/0.30 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.32 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.32 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.32 number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.13/0.32 number of clauses initially in problem: 112
% 0.13/0.32 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 34
% 0.13/0.32 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.32 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.32 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.13/0.32 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.13/0.32 distinct function count: 0
% 0.13/0.32 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32
% 0.13/0.32 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Changing weight limit from 60 to 9.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 9 after 5325 givens.
% 1.73/1.94
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 58.06 sec ----> 115785 [binary,115784.1,39.1] {-} $F.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 Length of proof is 17. Level of proof is 17.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 58.55/58.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 58.55/58.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 1 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,A,G)|s(truck1,B,C,D,E,F,A,G).
% 58.55/58.77 2 [] {+} s(A,B,C,D,E,F,A,G)| -s(truck1,B,C,D,E,F,A,G).
% 58.55/58.77 9 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,C,G)|s(A,B,truck1,D,E,F,C,G).
% 58.55/58.77 10 [] {+} s(A,B,C,D,E,F,C,G)| -s(A,B,truck1,D,E,F,C,G).
% 58.55/58.77 13 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,D,G)|s(A,B,C,truck1,E,F,D,G).
% 58.55/58.77 14 [] {+} s(A,B,C,D,E,F,D,G)| -s(A,B,C,truck1,E,F,D,G).
% 58.55/58.77 19 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,E)| -neq(F,truck2)|s(A,B,C,D,truck2,F,G,E).
% 58.55/58.77 20 [] {+} s(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,E)| -s(A,B,C,D,truck2,F,G,E).
% 58.55/58.77 21 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,F,G)| -neq(E,truck1)|s(A,B,C,D,E,truck1,F,G).
% 58.55/58.77 27 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,truck1,F,G)| -link(F,H)|s(A,B,C,D,E,truck1,H,G).
% 58.55/58.77 29 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)| -path(E,I)|s(A,B,C,D,I,F,G,H).
% 58.55/58.77 30 [] {+} -s(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H)| -path(F,I)|s(A,B,C,D,E,I,G,H).
% 58.55/58.77 39 [] {+} -s(s2,s2,s0,s2,s1,A,s0,B).
% 58.55/58.77 40 [] {-} neq(truck1,truck2).
% 58.55/58.77 61 [] {-} neq(s1,truck1).
% 58.55/58.77 96 [] {-} path(s0,p0_1).
% 58.55/58.77 99 [] {-} path(p0_1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 101 [] {-} path(p1_2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 102 [] {-} path(s2,p1_2).
% 58.55/58.77 108 [] {-} link(s1,s2).
% 58.55/58.77 110 [] {-} link(s2,s0).
% 58.55/58.77 111 [] {-} link(s0,s2).
% 58.55/58.77 112 [] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,s2,s0,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 114 [hyper,112,30,96] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,s2,p0_1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 124 [hyper,114,30,99] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,s2,s1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 147 [hyper,124,29,102] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,p1_2,s1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 187 [hyper,147,29,101] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,s1,s1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 246 [hyper,187,21,61] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,s1,truck1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 343 [hyper,246,19,40] {-} s(s1,s2,s2,s0,truck2,truck1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 586 [hyper,343,1] {-} s(truck1,s2,s2,s0,truck2,truck1,s1,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 1204 [hyper,586,27,108] {-} s(truck1,s2,s2,s0,truck2,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 2597 [hyper,1204,9] {-} s(truck1,s2,truck1,s0,truck2,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 5399 [hyper,2597,2] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,s0,truck2,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 10454 [hyper,5399,27,110] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,s0,truck2,truck1,s0,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 24372 [hyper,10454,13] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,truck1,truck2,truck1,s0,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 39751 [hyper,24372,27,111] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,truck1,truck2,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 57733 [hyper,39751,14] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,s2,truck2,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 76195 [hyper,57733,20] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,s2,s1,truck1,s2,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 95627 [hyper,76195,27,110] {-} s(s2,s2,truck1,s2,s1,truck1,s0,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 115784 [hyper,95627,10] {-} s(s2,s2,s0,s2,s1,truck1,s0,s1).
% 58.55/58.77 115785 [binary,115784.1,39.1] {-} $F.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 % SZS output end Refutation
% 58.55/58.77 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 ============ end of search ============
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 58.55/58.77
% 58.55/58.77 Process 21391 finished Tue May 31 20:42:42 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------