TSTP Solution File: PLA022-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PLA022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:59:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 120.81s 121.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 120.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : PLA022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:37:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 120.78/121.49 %-------------------------------------------
% 120.78/121.49 % File :CSE---1.6
% 120.78/121.49 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 120.78/121.49 % Transform :cnf
% 120.78/121.49 % Format :tptp:raw
% 120.78/121.49 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 120.78/121.49
% 120.78/121.49 % Result :Theorem 120.190000s
% 120.78/121.49 % Output :CNFRefutation 120.190000s
% 120.78/121.49 %-------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 % File : PLA022-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 120.81/121.50 % Domain : Planning (Blocks world)
% 120.81/121.50 % Problem : Block A on C on D
% 120.81/121.50 % Version : [SE94] axioms.
% 120.81/121.50 % English :
% 120.81/121.50
% 120.81/121.50 % Refs : [Sus73] Sussman (1973), A Computational Model of Skill Acquisi
% 120.81/121.50 % : [SE94] Segre & Elkan (1994), A High-Performance Explanation-B
% 120.81/121.50 % Source : [SE94]
% 120.81/121.50 % Names : - [SE94]
% 120.81/121.50
% 120.81/121.50 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 120.81/121.50 % Rating : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.29 v6.0.0, 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.31 v5.4.0, 0.39 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.46 v5.1.0, 0.38 v5.0.0, 0.33 v4.1.0, 0.27 v4.0.1, 0.29 v3.4.0, 0.20 v3.3.0, 0.00 v2.7.0, 0.25 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.5.0, 0.43 v2.4.0, 0.43 v2.3.0, 0.29 v2.2.1, 0.22 v2.2.0, 0.33 v2.1.0, 0.43 v2.0.0
% 120.81/121.50 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% 120.81/121.50 % Number of literals : 53 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% 120.81/121.50 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 120.81/121.50 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 120.81/121.50 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 120.81/121.50 % Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 120.81/121.50 % Number of variables : 37 ( 5 sgn)
% 120.81/121.50 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 120.81/121.50
% 120.81/121.50 % Comments : The axioms are a reconstruction of the situation calculus
% 120.81/121.50 % blocks world as in [Sus73].
% 120.81/121.50 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 %----Include Blocks world axioms
% 120.81/121.50 include('Axioms/PLA001-0.ax').
% 120.81/121.50 %----Include Blocks world difference axioms for 4 blocks
% 120.81/121.50 include('Axioms/PLA001-1.ax').
% 120.81/121.50 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 cnf(prove_ACD,negated_conjecture,
% 120.81/121.50 ~ holds(and(on(a,c),on(c,d)),State) ).
% 120.81/121.50
% 120.81/121.50 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 %-------------------------------------------
% 120.81/121.50 % Proof found
% 120.81/121.50 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 120.81/121.50 % SZS output start Proof
% 120.81/121.51 %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:0)
% 120.81/121.51 %VarNum:85(SingletonVarNum:37)
% 120.81/121.51 %MaxLitNum:4
% 120.81/121.51 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 120.81/121.51 %SharedTerms:35
% 120.81/121.51 %goalClause: 20
% 120.81/121.51 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 120.81/121.51 [1]P1(a1,a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [2]P2(a2,a14)
% 120.81/121.51 [3]P2(a2,a3)
% 120.81/121.51 [4]P2(a2,a5)
% 120.81/121.51 [5]P2(a2,a6)
% 120.81/121.51 [6]P2(a3,a14)
% 120.81/121.51 [7]P2(a3,a5)
% 120.81/121.51 [8]P2(a3,a6)
% 120.81/121.51 [9]P2(a5,a14)
% 120.81/121.51 [10]P2(a5,a6)
% 120.81/121.51 [11]P2(a6,a14)
% 120.81/121.51 [12]P1(f7(a2),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [13]P1(f7(a3),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [14]P1(f7(a5),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [16]P1(f10(a2,a14),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [17]P1(f10(a3,a14),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [18]P1(f10(a5,a6),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [19]P1(f10(a6,a14),a9)
% 120.81/121.51 [15]P1(f7(a14),x151)
% 120.81/121.51 [20]~P1(f4(f10(a2,a5),f10(a5,a6)),x201)
% 120.81/121.51 [21]~P2(x212,x211)+P2(x211,x212)
% 120.81/121.51 [30]~P1(f10(x301,x302),x305)+P1(f10(x301,x302),f8(f13(x303,x304),x305))
% 120.81/121.51 [22]~P1(x222,x223)+~P1(x221,x223)+P1(f4(x221,x222),x223)
% 120.81/121.51 [23]~P2(x231,x232)+~P1(f7(x231),x233)+P1(f7(x231),f8(f12(x232),x233))
% 120.81/121.51 [26]~P1(f11(x261),x263)+~P1(f7(x262),x263)+P1(a1,f8(f13(x261,x262),x263))
% 120.81/121.51 [27]~P1(f11(x271),x273)+~P1(f7(x272),x273)+P1(f7(x271),f8(f13(x271,x272),x273))
% 120.81/121.51 [31]~P1(f11(x311),x313)+~P1(f7(x312),x313)+P1(f10(x311,x312),f8(f13(x311,x312),x313))
% 120.81/121.51 [25]~P2(x251,x253)+~P1(f7(x251),x254)+P1(f7(x251),f8(f13(x252,x253),x254))
% 120.81/121.51 [28]~P2(x281,x283)+~P1(f10(x281,x282),x284)+P1(f10(x281,x282),f8(f12(x283),x284))
% 120.81/121.51 [24]~P2(x241,a14)+~P1(a1,x242)+~P1(f7(x241),x242)+P1(f11(x241),f8(f12(x241),x242))
% 120.81/121.51 [29]~P1(a1,x293)+~P1(f7(x292),x293)+~P1(f10(x292,x291),x293)+P1(f7(x291),f8(f12(x292),x293))
% 120.81/121.51 %EqnAxiom
% 120.81/121.51
% 120.81/121.51 %-------------------------------------------
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(36,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f10(a2,a14),f8(f13(x361,x362),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,2,16,18,22,21,30])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(40,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f7(a2),f8(f12(a14),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,2,12,16,18,22,21,30,25,23])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(60,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f11(a3),f8(f12(a3),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6,13,1,16,22,28,24])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(75,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P2(a5,a2)),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[36,4,22,21])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(108,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f10(a6,a14),f8(f13(x1081,x1082),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[40,5,19,22,21,30])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(110,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f11(a2),f8(f12(a2),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[40,5,19,12,2,1,22,21,30,24])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(142,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f10(a5,a6),f8(f13(x1421,x1422),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,18,20,22,21,30])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(166,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f7(a5),f8(f12(a2),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,14,18,75,28,23])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(172,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P2(a6,a3)),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,60,9,14,18,75,28,23,25,22,21])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(260,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f10(a5,a6),f8(f12(a2),a9))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[75,18,28])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(7458,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (~P1(f10(a2,a5),f8(f13(x74581,x74582),f8(f12(a2),a9)))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,260,22,30])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(7595,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 (P1(f10(a5,a6),f8(f13(x75951,x75952),f8(f13(x75953,x75954),a9)))),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[142,30])).
% 120.85/121.53 cnf(19178,plain,
% 120.85/121.53 ($false),
% 120.85/121.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[7458,7595,108,172,166,110,30,28,31]),
% 120.85/121.53 ['proof']).
% 120.85/121.56 % SZS output end Proof
% 120.85/121.56 % Total time :120.190000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------