TSTP Solution File: PLA022-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : PLA022-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 02:20:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 92 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 124 ( 68 ~; 54 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f102,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f66,f71,f101]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f99,f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
holds(clear(c),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state7) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( ~ holds(clear(c),s0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f98,f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
holds(clear(a),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state5) ).
fof(f98,plain,
( ~ holds(clear(a),s0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),s0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f95,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
holds(empty,s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state8) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( ~ holds(empty,s0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),s0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),s0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f61,f24]) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
holds(on(c,d),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state3) ).
fof(f61,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(empty,X0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0) )
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f60]) ).
fof(f60,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(empty,X0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0) ) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f69,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
differ(a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',differ_a_c) ).
fof(f69,plain,
( ~ differ(a,c)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f65,f11]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ differ(X1,X0)
| differ(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_differ) ).
fof(f65,plain,
( ~ differ(c,a)
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> differ(c,a) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
( spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f58,f63,f60]) ).
fof(f58,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ differ(c,a)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(empty,X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f57,f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
differ(a,table),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',differ_a_table) ).
fof(f57,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ differ(c,a)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
| ~ differ(a,table)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(empty,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f56,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X0] :
( ~ differ(X0,table)
| ~ holds(clear(X0),X2)
| ~ holds(empty,X2)
| holds(holding(X0),do(pickup(X0),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_1) ).
fof(f56,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(holding(a),do(pickup(X0),X1))
| ~ differ(c,X0)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X1)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X1) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(holding(a),do(pickup(X0),X1))
| ~ differ(c,X0)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X1)
| ~ differ(c,X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f39,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0] :
( ~ differ(X0,X3)
| ~ holds(clear(X0),X2)
| holds(clear(X0),do(pickup(X3),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_4) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(clear(c),do(pickup(X0),X1))
| ~ holds(holding(a),do(pickup(X0),X1))
| ~ differ(c,X0)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f37,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ differ(X0,X3)
| ~ holds(on(X0,X1),X2)
| holds(on(X0,X1),do(pickup(X3),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_3) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
| ~ holds(holding(a),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f35,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(clear(X1),X2)
| ~ holds(holding(X0),X2)
| holds(on(X0,X1),do(putdown(X0,X1),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',putdown_2) ).
fof(f35,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(on(a,c),do(putdown(X0,X1),X2))
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X2) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f32,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ holds(on(X0,X1),X2)
| holds(on(X0,X1),do(putdown(X3,X4),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',putdown_4) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(on(a,c),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f31,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ holds(X1,X2)
| ~ holds(X0,X2)
| holds(and(X0,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_definition) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
! [X2] : ~ holds(and(on(c,d),on(a,c)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ACD) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : PLA022-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 13:45:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9332)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Memory used [KB]: 1003
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9328)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9327)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9329)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9332)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9330)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9331)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Memory used [KB]: 1001
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9331)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9326)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Memory used [KB]: 1006
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9326)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9330)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.75 % (9328)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75 % (9327)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9333)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Memory used [KB]: 1001
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.75 % (9333)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-9232"
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.75 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.75 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.75
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Memory used [KB]: 1101
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.60/0.75 % (9330)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.60/0.75 % (9232)Success in time 0.38 s
% 0.60/0.75 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------