TSTP Solution File: PLA022-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : PLA022-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:09:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.52s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 71 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 99 ( 56 ~; 43 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 33 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f97,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f96,f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
holds(clear(a),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state5) ).
fof(f96,plain,
~ holds(clear(a),s0),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f95,f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
holds(clear(c),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state7) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( ~ holds(clear(c),s0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),s0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f92,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
holds(empty,s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state8) ).
fof(f92,plain,
( ~ holds(empty,s0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),s0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),s0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f88,f24]) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
holds(on(c,d),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial_state3) ).
fof(f88,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X1)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X1)
| ~ holds(empty,X1)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X1) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f86,f35]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
differ(c,a),
inference(resolution,[],[f11,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
differ(a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',differ_a_c) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ differ(X1,X0)
| differ(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_differ) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ holds(clear(c),X1)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X1)
| ~ differ(c,a)
| ~ holds(empty,X1)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f84,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0] :
( holds(clear(X0),do(pickup(X3),X2))
| ~ holds(clear(X0),X2)
| ~ differ(X0,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_4) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(clear(c),do(pickup(a),X0))
| ~ holds(empty,X0)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f83,f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
differ(a,table),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',differ_a_table) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),do(pickup(a),X0))
| ~ holds(empty,X0)
| ~ differ(a,table)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f82,f35]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(empty,X0)
| ~ differ(c,a)
| ~ holds(clear(a),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),do(pickup(a),X0))
| ~ differ(a,table)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f67,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X0] :
( holds(holding(X0),do(pickup(X0),X2))
| ~ holds(clear(X0),X2)
| ~ differ(X0,table)
| ~ holds(empty,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_1) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ holds(holding(a),do(pickup(X4),X5))
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X5)
| ~ differ(c,X4)
| ~ holds(clear(c),do(pickup(X4),X5)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f64,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( holds(on(X0,X1),do(pickup(X3),X2))
| ~ holds(on(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ differ(X0,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pickup_3) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),X0)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
| ~ holds(holding(a),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f60,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4] :
( holds(on(X0,X1),do(putdown(X3,X4),X2))
| ~ holds(on(X0,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',putdown_4) ).
fof(f60,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ holds(on(c,d),do(putdown(a,c),X1))
| ~ holds(holding(a),X1)
| ~ holds(clear(c),X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f7,f54]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ holds(on(a,c),X0)
| ~ holds(on(c,d),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f31]) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
! [X2] : ~ holds(and(on(c,d),on(a,c)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ACD) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( holds(and(X0,X1),X2)
| ~ holds(X1,X2)
| ~ holds(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_definition) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( holds(on(X0,X1),do(putdown(X0,X1),X2))
| ~ holds(holding(X0),X2)
| ~ holds(clear(X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',putdown_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : PLA022-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 10:11:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (1847)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (1856)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (1857)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (1852)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (1865)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1872)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.52 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.52 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Termination phase: Blocked clause elimination
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (1856)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Time elapsed: 0.117 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (1864)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (1846)Success in time 0.165 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------