TSTP Solution File: PLA019-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : PLA019-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:59:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 129.00s 129.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 129.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : PLA019-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:58:19 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 129.00/129.04 %-------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.04 % File :CSE---1.6
% 129.00/129.04 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 129.00/129.04 % Transform :cnf
% 129.00/129.04 % Format :tptp:raw
% 129.00/129.04 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 129.00/129.04
% 129.00/129.04 % Result :Theorem 128.430000s
% 129.00/129.04 % Output :CNFRefutation 128.430000s
% 129.00/129.04 %-------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 % File : PLA019-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 129.00/129.06 % Domain : Planning (Blocks world)
% 129.00/129.06 % Problem : Block D on C
% 129.00/129.06 % Version : [SE94] axioms.
% 129.00/129.06 % English :
% 129.00/129.06
% 129.00/129.06 % Refs : [Sus73] Sussman (1973), A Computational Model of Skill Acquisi
% 129.00/129.06 % : [SE94] Segre & Elkan (1994), A High-Performance Explanation-B
% 129.00/129.06 % Source : [SE94]
% 129.00/129.06 % Names : - [SE94]
% 129.00/129.06
% 129.00/129.06 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 129.00/129.06 % Rating : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.43 v6.0.0, 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.38 v5.4.0, 0.44 v5.3.0, 0.50 v5.2.0, 0.54 v5.1.0, 0.44 v5.0.0, 0.33 v4.1.0, 0.40 v4.0.1, 0.43 v3.7.0, 0.57 v3.5.0, 0.43 v3.4.0, 0.20 v3.3.0, 0.33 v2.7.0, 0.38 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.5.0, 0.43 v2.4.0, 0.43 v2.3.0, 0.29 v2.2.1, 0.22 v2.2.0, 0.33 v2.1.0, 0.43 v2.0.0
% 129.00/129.06 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 20 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% 129.00/129.06 % Number of literals : 53 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% 129.00/129.06 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 129.00/129.06 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 129.00/129.06 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 129.00/129.06 % Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% 129.00/129.06 % Number of variables : 37 ( 5 sgn)
% 129.00/129.06 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 129.00/129.06
% 129.00/129.06 % Comments : The axioms are a reconstruction of the situation calculus
% 129.00/129.06 % blocks world as in [Sus73].
% 129.00/129.06 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 %----Include Blocks world axioms
% 129.00/129.06 include('Axioms/PLA001-0.ax').
% 129.00/129.06 %----Include Blocks world difference axioms for 4 blocks
% 129.00/129.06 include('Axioms/PLA001-1.ax').
% 129.00/129.06 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 cnf(prove_DC,negated_conjecture,
% 129.00/129.06 ~ holds(on(d,c),State) ).
% 129.00/129.06
% 129.00/129.06 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 %-------------------------------------------
% 129.00/129.06 % Proof found
% 129.00/129.06 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 129.00/129.06 % SZS output start Proof
% 129.00/129.07 %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:0)
% 129.00/129.07 %VarNum:85(SingletonVarNum:37)
% 129.00/129.07 %MaxLitNum:4
% 129.00/129.07 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 129.00/129.07 %SharedTerms:34
% 129.00/129.07 %goalClause: 20
% 129.00/129.07 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 129.00/129.07 [1]P1(a1,a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [2]P2(a2,a14)
% 129.00/129.07 [3]P2(a2,a3)
% 129.00/129.07 [4]P2(a2,a5)
% 129.00/129.07 [5]P2(a2,a6)
% 129.00/129.07 [6]P2(a3,a14)
% 129.00/129.07 [7]P2(a3,a5)
% 129.00/129.07 [8]P2(a3,a6)
% 129.00/129.07 [9]P2(a5,a14)
% 129.00/129.07 [10]P2(a5,a6)
% 129.00/129.07 [11]P2(a6,a14)
% 129.00/129.07 [12]P1(f7(a2),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [13]P1(f7(a3),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [14]P1(f7(a5),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [16]P1(f10(a2,a14),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [17]P1(f10(a3,a14),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [18]P1(f10(a5,a6),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [19]P1(f10(a6,a14),a9)
% 129.00/129.07 [15]P1(f7(a14),x151)
% 129.00/129.07 [20]~P1(f10(a6,a5),x201)
% 129.00/129.07 [21]~P2(x212,x211)+P2(x211,x212)
% 129.00/129.07 [30]~P1(f10(x301,x302),x305)+P1(f10(x301,x302),f8(f13(x303,x304),x305))
% 129.00/129.07 [22]~P1(x222,x223)+~P1(x221,x223)+P1(f4(x221,x222),x223)
% 129.00/129.07 [23]~P2(x231,x232)+~P1(f7(x231),x233)+P1(f7(x231),f8(f12(x232),x233))
% 129.00/129.07 [26]~P1(f11(x261),x263)+~P1(f7(x262),x263)+P1(a1,f8(f13(x261,x262),x263))
% 129.00/129.07 [27]~P1(f11(x271),x273)+~P1(f7(x272),x273)+P1(f7(x271),f8(f13(x271,x272),x273))
% 129.00/129.07 [31]~P1(f11(x311),x313)+~P1(f7(x312),x313)+P1(f10(x311,x312),f8(f13(x311,x312),x313))
% 129.00/129.07 [25]~P2(x251,x253)+~P1(f7(x251),x254)+P1(f7(x251),f8(f13(x252,x253),x254))
% 129.00/129.07 [28]~P2(x281,x283)+~P1(f10(x281,x282),x284)+P1(f10(x281,x282),f8(f12(x283),x284))
% 129.00/129.07 [24]~P2(x241,a14)+~P1(a1,x242)+~P1(f7(x241),x242)+P1(f11(x241),f8(f12(x241),x242))
% 129.00/129.07 [29]~P1(a1,x293)+~P1(f7(x292),x293)+~P1(f10(x292,x291),x293)+P1(f7(x291),f8(f12(x292),x293))
% 129.00/129.07 %EqnAxiom
% 129.00/129.07
% 129.00/129.07 %-------------------------------------------
% 129.07/129.10 cnf(45,plain,
% 129.07/129.10 (P1(f7(a14),x451)),
% 129.07/129.10 inference(rename_variables,[],[15])).
% 129.07/129.10 cnf(47,plain,
% 129.07/129.10 (~P1(f11(x471),x472)+P1(a1,f8(f13(x471,a14),x472))),
% 129.07/129.10 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,1,2,15,45,12,14,16,31,21,30,25,23,28,24,26])).
% 129.07/129.10 cnf(49,plain,
% 129.07/129.10 (~P1(f11(x491),x492)+P1(f7(x491),f8(f13(x491,a14),x492))),
% 129.07/129.10 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,1,2,15,45,12,14,16,31,21,30,25,23,28,24,26,27])).
% 129.07/129.10 cnf(54,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f7(a6),f8(f12(a5),a9))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14,1,29])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(58,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f11(a3),f8(f12(a3),a9))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6,13,18,14,1,12,29,25,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(102,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f11(a5),f8(f12(a5),a9))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,14,1,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(174,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P2(a14,a6)),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,15,14,20,1,31,29,21])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(203,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(a1,f8(f13(a3,a14),f8(f12(a3),a9)))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,1,6,47,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(204,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(a1,f8(f13(a5,a14),f8(f12(a5),a9)))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[14,9,1,47,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(250,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (~P1(a1,f8(f13(a3,a14),f8(f12(a3),a9)))+P1(f11(a3),f8(f12(a3),f8(f13(a3,a14),f8(f12(a3),a9))))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[58,6,49,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(23384,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f7(a6),f8(f13(x233841,a14),f8(f12(a5),a9)))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[174,54,21,25])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(23482,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f11(a3),f8(f12(a3),f8(f13(a3,a14),f8(f12(a3),a9))))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[203,250])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(26572,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (P1(f11(a6),f8(f12(a6),f8(f13(a5,a14),f8(f12(a5),a9))))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[204,23482,23384,11,15,31,24])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(27312,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 (~P1(f7(a5),f8(f12(a6),f8(f13(a5,a14),f8(f12(a5),a9))))),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,26572,30,31])).
% 129.07/129.11 cnf(27315,plain,
% 129.07/129.11 ($false),
% 129.07/129.11 inference(scs_inference,[],[27312,10,102,15,23,27]),
% 129.07/129.11 ['proof']).
% 129.07/129.15 % SZS output end Proof
% 129.07/129.15 % Total time :128.430000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------