TSTP Solution File: PLA017-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : PLA017-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:32:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.68s 1.89s
% Output : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : PLA017-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.28 % DateTime : Tue May 31 23:44:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.30 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.30 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.30 Tue May 31 23:44:44 2022
% 0.14/0.30 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27278.
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.30 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.30 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.30 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.30 in usable.
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.30 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.30
% 0.14/0.30 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.33 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.33 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.33 number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 0.14/0.33 number of clauses initially in problem: 31
% 0.14/0.33 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 38
% 0.14/0.33 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.14/0.33 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 96
% 0.14/0.33 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.14/0.33 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.14/0.33 distinct function count: 7
% 0.14/0.33 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.33
% 0.14/0.33 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Changing weight limit from 60 to 15.
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 6 [ 1 2 16305 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 10 [ 2 1 1479 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Model 11 [ 1 1 10882 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.37/1.61 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 100 givens.
% 1.37/1.61
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.56 sec ----> 7699 [binary,7698.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 2 [] {+} holds(holding(A),do(pickup(A),B))| -holds(empty,B)| -holds(clear(A),B)| -differ(A,table).
% 1.68/1.89 5 [] {+} holds(clear(A),do(pickup(B),C))| -holds(clear(A),C)| -differ(A,B).
% 1.68/1.89 7 [] {+} holds(on(A,B),do(putdown(A,B),C))| -holds(holding(A),C)| -holds(clear(B),C).
% 1.68/1.89 11 [] {+} differ(A,B)| -differ(B,A).
% 1.68/1.89 12 [] {+} -holds(on(a,c),A).
% 1.68/1.89 14 [] {+} differ(a,c).
% 1.68/1.89 16 [] {+} differ(a,table).
% 1.68/1.89 27 [] {-} holds(clear(a),s0).
% 1.68/1.89 29 [] {+} holds(clear(c),s0).
% 1.68/1.89 30 [] {+} holds(empty,s0).
% 1.68/1.89 34 [hyper,14,11] {+} differ(c,a).
% 1.68/1.89 47 [hyper,27,2,30,16] {-} holds(holding(a),do(pickup(a),s0)).
% 1.68/1.89 254 [hyper,34,5,29] {+} holds(clear(c),do(pickup(a),s0)).
% 1.68/1.89 7698 [hyper,254,7,47] {-} holds(on(a,c),do(putdown(a,c),do(pickup(a),s0))).
% 1.68/1.89 7699 [binary,7698.1,12.1] {-} $F.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.68/1.89 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ============ end of search ============
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 true clauses given 52 (33.1%)
% 1.68/1.89 false clauses given 105
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 FALSE TRUE
% 1.68/1.89 7 0 4
% 1.68/1.89 8 0 50
% 1.68/1.89 9 15 82
% 1.68/1.89 10 215 212
% 1.68/1.89 11 468 241
% 1.68/1.89 12 733 220
% 1.68/1.89 13 1008 250
% 1.68/1.89 14 102 98
% 1.68/1.89 15 50 112
% 1.68/1.89 tot: 2591 1269 (32.9% true)
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Model 11 [ 1 -36 10882 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.68/1.89
% 1.68/1.89 Process 27278 finished Tue May 31 23:44:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------