TSTP Solution File: PLA006-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : PLA006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:10:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_CTable,negated_conjecture,
~ holds(on(c,table),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',prove_CTable) ).
cnf(putdown_2,axiom,
( holds(on(X1,X2),do(putdown(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ holds(holding(X1),X3)
| ~ holds(clear(X2),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',putdown_2) ).
cnf(clear_table,axiom,
holds(clear(table),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',clear_table) ).
cnf(pickup_1,axiom,
( holds(holding(X1),do(pickup(X1),X2))
| ~ holds(empty,X2)
| ~ holds(clear(X1),X2)
| ~ differ(X1,table) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',pickup_1) ).
cnf(differ_c_table,axiom,
differ(c,table),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',differ_c_table) ).
cnf(initial_state7,axiom,
holds(clear(c),s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',initial_state7) ).
cnf(initial_state8,axiom,
holds(empty,s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p',initial_state8) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ holds(on(c,table),X1),
prove_CTable ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( holds(on(X1,X2),do(putdown(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ holds(holding(X1),X3)
| ~ holds(clear(X2),X3) ),
putdown_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
holds(clear(table),X1),
clear_table ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ holds(holding(c),X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( holds(holding(X1),do(pickup(X1),X2))
| ~ holds(empty,X2)
| ~ holds(clear(X1),X2)
| ~ differ(X1,table) ),
pickup_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
differ(c,table),
differ_c_table ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ holds(clear(c),X1)
| ~ holds(empty,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
holds(clear(c),s0),
initial_state7 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
holds(empty,s0),
initial_state8 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : PLA006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:36:46 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.GGW4uS0V55/E---3.1_3374.p
% 0.16/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3451 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3456 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.43 # Search class: FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.43 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses : 31
% 0.16/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 31
% 0.16/0.43 # Processed clauses : 75
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 73
% 0.16/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Generated clauses : 28
% 0.16/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.16/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Paramodulations : 28
% 0.16/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.16/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.16/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 31
% 0.16/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46
% 0.16/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.16/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.16/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1008
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1656 pages
% 0.16/0.43
% 0.16/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.43 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.16/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.16/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.16/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------