TSTP Solution File: PLA006-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : PLA006-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:36:38 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.34s
% Output : Refutation 0.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4631/PLA/PLA006-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 126] [nf = 0] [nu = 48] [ut = 38]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 43130] [nf = 2] [nu = 35053] [ut = 3540]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),table_0()),x0)
% B9: differ_2(c_0(),table_0())
% B28: ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(holding_1(x0),x2) | holds_2(on_2(x0,x1),do_2(putdown_2(x0,x1),x2))
% B30: ~differ_2(x0,table_0()) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x0),x1) | ~holds_2(empty_0(),x1) | holds_2(holding_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x0),x1))
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U1: < d0 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 b > holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0)
% U12: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b > holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0())
% U15: < d0 v0 dv0 f1 c2 t3 td2 b > holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0())
% U38: < d2 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 > ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),x0)
% U3550: < d3 v0 dv0 f3 c3 t6 td3 > holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),do_2(pickup_1(c_0()),s0_0()))
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0) ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U12:
% holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12
% Derivation of unit clause U15:
% holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15
% Derivation of unit clause U38:
% ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),table_0()),x0) ....... B0
% ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(holding_1(x0),x2) | holds_2(on_2(x0,x1),do_2(putdown_2(x0,x1),x2)) ....... B28
% ~holds_2(clear_1(table_0()), x0) | ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B28:L2]
% holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0) ....... U1
% ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), x0) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U3550:
% differ_2(c_0(),table_0()) ....... B9
% ~differ_2(x0,table_0()) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x0),x1) | ~holds_2(empty_0(),x1) | holds_2(holding_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x0),x1)) ....... B30
% ~holds_2(clear_1(c_0()), x0) | ~holds_2(empty_0(), x0) | holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), x0)) ....... R1 [B9:L0, B30:L0]
% holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15
% ~holds_2(empty_0(), s0_0()) | holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), s0_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U15:L0]
% holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12
% holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), s0_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U12:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),do_2(pickup_1(c_0()),s0_0())) ....... U3550
% ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),x0) ....... U38
% [] ....... R1 [U3550:L0, U38:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 52098
% resolvents: 52083 factors: 15
% Number of unit clauses generated: 43542
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 83.58
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 20 [1] = 18 [2] = 3502 [3] = 11
% Total = 3551
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 43542 [2] = 8274 [3] = 282
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] differ_2 (+)20 (-)0
% [1] holds_2 (+)3529 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)3549 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 3551
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1815
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 52103
% Number of unification failures: 8514
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 7057
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 639312
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 602
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 9
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 31890
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 20960
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 12
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7735
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 38250
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.07
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.20
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 50
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 60617
% ConstructUnitClause() = 35421
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.05 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.34 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------