TSTP Solution File: PLA002-1 by Gandalf---c-2.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem : PLA002-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality:r
% Format : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s
% Computer : art10.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 unknown
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1000MB
% OS : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
%
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/PLA/PLA002-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
%
% prove-all-passes started
%
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: medium
%
% strategies selected:
% (hyper 27 #f 2 5)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 2 5)
% (binary-double 16 #f 2 5)
% (binary 54 #t 2 5)
% (binary-order 27 #f 2 5)
% (binary-posweight-order 125 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 27 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 54 #f)
% (binary-order 54 #f)
% (hyper-order 43 #f)
% (binary 109 #t)
%
%
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
%
%
% timer checkpoints: c(17,40,0,34,0,0,52,50,0,69,0,0,96,50,0,113,0,0,153,50,0,170,0,0)
%
%
% START OF PROOF
% 145 [?] ?
% 154 [] at(f,s0).
% 155 [] at(d,go(d,X)) | -at(f,X).
% 159 [] at(c,go(c,X)) | -at(d,X).
% 163 [] at(b,skate(b,X)) | -at(c,X) | -cold(X).
% 165 [] at(a,drive(a,X)) | -at(b,X).
% 170 [] -at(a,X).
% 171 [hyper:155,154] at(d,go(d,s0)).
% 178 [hyper:159,171] at(c,go(c,go(d,s0))).
% 185 [hyper:163,178,cut:145] at(b,skate(b,go(c,go(d,s0)))).
% 216 [hyper:165,185,cut:170] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
%
% Proof found by the following strategy:
%
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 5
% clause depth limited to 5
% seconds given: 27
%
%
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
%
% Global statistics over all passes:
%
% given clauses: 80
% derived clauses: 221
% kept clauses: 36
% kept size sum: 317
% kept mid-nuclei: 42
% kept new demods: 0
% forw unit-subs: 39
% forw double-subs: 5
% forw overdouble-subs: 0
% backward subs: 14
% fast unit cutoff: 8
% full unit cutoff: 0
% dbl unit cutoff: 0
% real runtime : 0.1
% process. runtime: 0.1
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics:
% tried: 25
% length fails: 0
% strength fails: 0
% predlist fails: 23
% aux str. fails: 0
% by-lit fails: 0
% full subs tried: 2
% full subs fail: 0
%
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/PLA/PLA002-1+noeq.in")
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------