TSTP Solution File: PLA001-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : PLA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:58:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : PLA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 05:58:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  % File     : PLA001-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.20/0.65  % Domain   : Planning
% 0.20/0.65  % Problem  : Cheyenne to DesMoines, buying a loaf of bread on the way
% 0.20/0.65  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.20/0.65  % English  : The problem is to drive from Cheyenne, Wyoming to Des Moines,
% 0.20/0.65  %            Iowa and end up there with a loaf of bread. A portion of the
% 0.20/0.65  %            road map is expressed in clause form. The allowable actions
% 0.20/0.65  %            are to drive from a city to a neighboring city, to buy a loaf
% 0.20/0.65  %            of bread at a city, and to wait_at at a city for one unit
% 0.20/0.65  %            of time. Buying a loaf of bread takes one unit of time and
% 0.20/0.65  %            driving to a neighboring city takes two units of time.
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  % Refs     : [Pla81] Plaisted (1981), Theorem Proving with Abstraction
% 0.20/0.65  % Source   : [Pla81]
% 0.20/0.65  % Names    : - [Pla81]
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.65  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.21 v6.0.0, 0.33 v5.5.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.28 v5.3.0, 0.35 v5.2.0, 0.23 v5.1.0, 0.19 v5.0.0, 0.13 v4.1.0, 0.20 v4.0.1, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.33 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.7.0, 0.12 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.4.0, 0.14 v2.3.0, 0.14 v2.2.1, 0.22 v2.1.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.20/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 2-4 aty)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  14 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   20 (   2 sgn)
% 0.20/0.65  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.20/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(drive1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65      ( ~ at(FromCity,Loaves,Time,Situation)
% 0.20/0.65      | ~ next_to(FromCity,ToCity)
% 0.20/0.65      | at(ToCity,Loaves,s(s(Time)),drive(ToCity,Situation)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(drive2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65      ( ~ at(FromCity,Loaves,Time,Situation)
% 0.20/0.65      | ~ next_to(ToCity,FromCity)
% 0.20/0.65      | at(ToCity,Loaves,s(s(Time)),drive(ToCity,Situation)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(wait_in_city,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65      ( ~ at(City,Loaves,Time,Situation)
% 0.20/0.65      | at(City,Loaves,s(Time),wait_at(Situation)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(buy_in_city,axiom,
% 0.20/0.65      ( ~ at(City,Loaves,Time,Situation)
% 0.20/0.65      | at(City,s(Loaves),s(Time),buy(Situation)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map1,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(winnemucca,elko) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map2,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(elko,saltLakeCity) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map3,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(saltLakeCity,rockSprings) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map4,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(rockSprings,laramie) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map5,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(laramie,cheyenne) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map6,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(cheyenne,northPlatte) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map7,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(northPlatte,grandIsland) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map8,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(grandIsland,lincoln) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map9,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(lincoln,omaha) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(map10,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      next_to(omaha,desMoines) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(initial,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.65      at(cheyenne,none,start,initial_situation) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  cnf(prove_you_gat_get_there_with_bread,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.65      ~ at(desMoines,s(none),Time,Situation) ).
% 0.20/0.65  
% 0.20/0.65  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.66  %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.66  %VarNum:40(SingletonVarNum:20)
% 0.20/0.66  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.66  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.20/0.66  %SharedTerms:26
% 0.20/0.66  %goalClause: 12
% 0.20/0.66  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.66  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.20/0.66  [2]P1(a2,a7)
% 0.20/0.66  [3]P1(a7,a8)
% 0.20/0.66  [4]P1(a8,a9)
% 0.20/0.66  [5]P1(a9,a3)
% 0.20/0.66  [6]P1(a3,a12)
% 0.20/0.66  [7]P1(a12,a10)
% 0.20/0.66  [8]P1(a10,a13)
% 0.20/0.66  [9]P1(a13,a15)
% 0.20/0.66  [10]P1(a15,a5)
% 0.20/0.66  [11]P2(a3,a14,a17,a11)
% 0.20/0.66  [12]~P2(a5,f16(a14),x121,x122)
% 0.20/0.66  [13]~P2(x131,x132,x133,x134)+P2(x131,x132,f16(x133),f18(x134))
% 0.20/0.66  [14]~P2(x141,x142,x143,x144)+P2(x141,f16(x142),f16(x143),f4(x144))
% 0.20/0.66  [15]~P2(x155,x152,x153,x154)+~P1(x151,x155)+P2(x151,x152,f16(f16(x153)),f6(x151,x154))
% 0.20/0.66  [16]~P2(x165,x162,x163,x164)+~P1(x165,x161)+P2(x161,x162,f16(f16(x163)),f6(x161,x164))
% 0.20/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.66  
% 0.20/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a5,a14,x171,x172)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,14])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a5,f16(a14),x181,x182)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[12])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a15,f16(a14),x191,x192)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,18,10,14,16])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (P2(a3,a14,f16(a17),f18(a11))),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,18,10,11,14,16,15,13])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (P2(a12,a14,f16(f16(a17)),f6(a12,a11))),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,11,14,16])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a15,f16(a14),x331,x332)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[19])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a13,f16(a14),x351,x352)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,19,33,14,16])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a13,a14,x471,x472)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[35,14])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     (~P2(a10,a14,x651,x652)),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,24,17,47,15,16])).
% 0.20/0.66  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.20/0.66     ($false),
% 0.20/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,28,65,16]),
% 0.20/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.66  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------