TSTP Solution File: NUN089+2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : NUN089+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:10:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.75s 1.95s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   7 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ r1(A)
    | A = dollar_c1 ),
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( A != dollar_c1
    | r1(A) ),
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ r1(A)
    | A != B
    | ~ r2(C,B) ),
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(45,axiom,
    r2(dollar_c3,dollar_c5),
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(46,axiom,
    dollar_c4 = dollar_c5,
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(48,plain,
    dollar_c5 = dollar_c4,
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[46])]),
    [iquote('copy,46,flip.1')] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    r1(dollar_c4),
    file('NUN089+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    r2(dollar_c3,dollar_c4),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[45]),48]),
    [iquote('back_demod,45,demod,48')] ).

cnf(57,plain,
    r1(dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[12,2]),
    [iquote('hyper,12,2')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    dollar_c4 = dollar_c1,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[49,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,49,1')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    r2(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[53]),62]),
    [iquote('back_demod,53,demod,62')] ).

cnf(108,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[63,10,57,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,63,10,57,12')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUN089+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:52:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.75/1.95  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.75/1.95  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 1.75/1.95  Wed Jul 27 02:52:06 2022
% 1.75/1.95  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 28256.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.75/1.95  set(auto).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.75/1.95  clear(print_given).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  formula_list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  all A (A=A).
% 1.75/1.95  exists Y24 all X19 (-r1(X19)&X19!=Y24|r1(X19)&X19=Y24).
% 1.75/1.95  all X11 exists Y21 all X12 (-r2(X11,X12)&X12!=Y21|r2(X11,X12)&X12=Y21).
% 1.75/1.95  all X13 X14 exists Y22 all X15 (-r3(X13,X14,X15)&X15!=Y22|r3(X13,X14,X15)&X15=Y22).
% 1.75/1.95  all X16 X17 exists Y23 all X18 (-r4(X16,X17,X18)&X18!=Y23|r4(X16,X17,X18)&X18=Y23).
% 1.75/1.95  all X1 X8 exists Y4 ((exists Y5 ((exists Y15 (r2(X8,Y15)&r3(X1,Y15,Y5)))&Y5=Y4))& (exists Y7 (r2(Y7,Y4)&r3(X1,X8,Y7)))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X2 X9 exists Y2 ((exists Y3 ((exists Y14 (r2(X9,Y14)&r4(X2,Y14,Y3)))&Y3=Y2))& (exists Y6 (r3(Y6,X2,Y2)&r4(X2,X9,Y6)))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X3 X10 ((all Y12 ((all Y13 (-r2(X3,Y13)|Y13!=Y12))| -r2(X10,Y12)))|X3=X10).
% 1.75/1.95  all X4 exists Y9 ((exists Y16 (r1(Y16)&r3(X4,Y16,Y9)))&Y9=X4).
% 1.75/1.95  all X5 exists Y8 ((exists Y17 (r1(Y17)&r4(X5,Y17,Y8)))& (exists Y18 (r1(Y18)&Y8=Y18))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X6 ((exists Y19 (r1(Y19)&X6=Y19))| (exists Y1 Y11 (r2(Y1,Y11)&X6=Y11))).
% 1.75/1.95  all X7 Y10 ((all Y20 (-r1(Y20)|Y20!=Y10))| -r2(X7,Y10)).
% 1.75/1.95  -(all Y1 ((all Y2 ((all Y3 (-r1(Y3)| -r2(Y3,Y2)))| -r2(Y2,Y1)))| (all Y4 (Y4!=Y1| -r1(Y4))))).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r1(X19)|X19=$c1.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X19!=$c1|r1(X19).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r2(X11,X12)|X12=$f1(X11).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X12!=$f1(X11)|r2(X11,X12).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r3(X13,X14,X15)|X15=$f2(X13,X14).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X15!=$f2(X13,X14)|r3(X13,X14,X15).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r4(X16,X17,X18)|X18=$f3(X16,X17).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X18!=$f3(X16,X17)|r4(X16,X17,X18).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r2(X8,$f4(X1,X8)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r3(X1,$f4(X1,X8),$f5(X1,X8)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] $f5(X1,X8)=$f7(X1,X8).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r2($f6(X1,X8),$f7(X1,X8)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r3(X1,X8,$f6(X1,X8)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r2(X9,$f8(X2,X9)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r4(X2,$f8(X2,X9),$f9(X2,X9)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] $f9(X2,X9)=$f11(X2,X9).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r3($f10(X2,X9),X2,$f11(X2,X9)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r4(X2,X9,$f10(X2,X9)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r2(X3,Y13)|Y13!=Y12| -r2(X10,Y12)|X3=X10.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($f12(X4)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r3(X4,$f12(X4),$f13(X4)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] $f13(X4)=X4.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($f14(X5)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r4(X5,$f14(X5),$f16(X5)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($f15(X5)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] $f16(X5)=$f15(X5).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($f17(X6))|r2($f19(X6),$f18(X6)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($f17(X6))|X6=$f18(X6).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X6=$f17(X6)|r2($f19(X6),$f18(X6)).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] X6=$f17(X6)|X6=$f18(X6).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -r1(Y20)|Y20!=Y10| -r2(X7,Y10).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r2($c2,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r2($c3,$c5).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] $c4=$c5.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] r1($c4).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.75/1.95  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.75/1.95  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.75/1.95  clauses in usable.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process usable:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 1 [] -r1(A)|A=$c1.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 2 [] A!=$c1|r1(A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] -r2(A,B)|B=$f1(A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 4 [] A!=$f1(B)|r2(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -r3(A,B,C)|C=$f2(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] A!=$f2(B,C)|r3(B,C,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 7 [] -r4(A,B,C)|C=$f3(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 8 [] A!=$f3(B,C)|r4(B,C,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 9 [] -r2(A,B)|B!=C| -r2(D,C)|A=D.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [] -r1(A)|A!=B| -r2(C,B).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process sos:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 13 [] r2(A,$f4(B,A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 14 [] r3(A,$f4(A,B),$f5(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 16 [copy,15,flip.1] $f7(A,B)=$f5(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] $f7(A,B)=$f5(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 19 [copy,18,demod,17] r2($f6(A,B),$f5(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 20 [] r3(A,B,$f6(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] r2(A,$f8(B,A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 22 [] r4(A,$f8(A,B),$f9(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 23 [] $f9(A,B)=$f11(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ---> New Demodulator: 24 [new_demod,23] $f9(A,B)=$f11(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 25 [] r3($f10(A,B),A,$f11(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 26 [] r4(A,B,$f10(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 27 [] r1($f12(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 28 [] r3(A,$f12(A),$f13(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 29 [] $f13(A)=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ---> New Demodulator: 30 [new_demod,29] $f13(A)=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 31 [] r1($f14(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 32 [] r4(A,$f14(A),$f16(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 33 [] r1($f15(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 34 [] $f16(A)=$f15(A).
% 1.75/1.95  ---> New Demodulator: 35 [new_demod,34] $f16(A)=$f15(A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 36 [] r1($f17(A))|r2($f19(A),$f18(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 38 [copy,37,flip.2] r1($f17(A))|$f18(A)=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 40 [copy,39,flip.1] $f17(A)=A|r2($f19(A),$f18(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 42 [copy,41,flip.1,flip.2] $f17(A)=A|$f18(A)=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 43 [] r1($c2).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 44 [] r2($c2,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 45 [] r2($c3,$c5).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 47 [copy,46,flip.1] $c5=$c4.
% 1.75/1.95  ---> New Demodulator: 48 [new_demod,47] $c5=$c4.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 49 [] r1($c4).
% 1.75/1.95    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95  12 back subsumes 11.
% 1.75/1.95  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.75/1.95  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 24.
% 1.75/1.95      >> back demodulating 22 with 24.
% 1.75/1.95  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 30.
% 1.75/1.95      >> back demodulating 28 with 30.
% 1.75/1.95  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 35.
% 1.75/1.95      >> back demodulating 32 with 35.
% 1.75/1.95  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 48.
% 1.75/1.95      >> back demodulating 45 with 48.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 108 [hyper,63,10,57,12] $F.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.95  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ============ end of search ============
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.75/1.95  clauses given                 13
% 1.75/1.95  clauses generated             60
% 1.75/1.95  clauses kept                  86
% 1.75/1.95  clauses forward subsumed      32
% 1.75/1.95  clauses back subsumed          1
% 1.75/1.95  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.75/1.95  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Process 28256 finished Wed Jul 27 02:52:08 2022
% 1.75/1.95  Otter interrupted
% 1.75/1.95  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------