%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUN089+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUN089+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 02:54:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.46  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.46  SPASS derived 41 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 76 clauses.
% 0.19/0.46  SPASS allocated 97824 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.46  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.46  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.46  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  
% 0.19/0.46  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  2[0:Inp] ||  -> r1(skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.46  3[0:Inp] ||  -> id__dfg(skc8,skc5)*r.
% 0.19/0.46  5[0:Inp] ||  -> r2(skc6,skc5)*.
% 0.19/0.46  48[0:Inp] r1(u) || r2(v,w)* id__dfg(u,w)* -> .
% 0.19/0.46  92[0:Res:3.0,48.1] r1(skc8) || r2(u,skc5)* -> .
% 0.19/0.46  106[0:MRR:92.0,2.0] || r2(u,skc5)* -> .
% 0.19/0.46  107[0:UnC:106.0,5.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  Formulae used in the proof : zerounidtwo axiom_7a
% 0.19/0.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------