TSTP Solution File: NUN089+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUN089+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.07s 1.29s
% Output : Refutation 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUN089+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 02:59:44 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Thu Jun 2 02:59:44 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30618.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.20/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 40 back subsumes 35.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.42 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.42 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.42 number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.20/0.42 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.20/0.42 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.20/0.42 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 31
% 0.20/0.42 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.42 absolute distinct symbol count: 29
% 0.20/0.42 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.20/0.42 distinct function count: 19
% 0.20/0.42 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 2 [ 1 1 249 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 3 [ 1 1 383 ] (0.00 seconds, 942 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 4 [ 1 1 271 ] (0.00 seconds, 150676 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 5 [ 1 0 2970 ] (0.00 seconds, 3363 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 6 [ 1 0 1150 ] (0.00 seconds, 1768 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 7 [ 1 0 889 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 8 [ 1 0 2387 ] (0.00 seconds, 2669 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 9 [ 2 0 1775 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 10 [ 15 0 305 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.91 sec ----> 82 [hyper,65,20,66,64] {-} $F.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Length of proof is 0. Level of proof is 0.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 20 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -r1(A)| -r2(C,B).
% 1.07/1.29 64 [] {+} r2($c3,$c5).
% 1.07/1.29 65 [] {+} id($c4,$c5).
% 1.07/1.29 66 [] {+} r1($c4).
% 1.07/1.29 82 [hyper,65,20,66,64] {-} $F.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.07/1.29 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 ============ end of search ============
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 true clauses given 1 (8.3%)
% 1.07/1.29 false clauses given 11
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 FALSE TRUE
% 1.07/1.29 3 0 2
% 1.07/1.29 4 4 3
% 1.07/1.29 5 2 0
% 1.07/1.29 6 7 0
% 1.07/1.29 7 4 0
% 1.07/1.29 8 5 0
% 1.07/1.29 9 3 0
% 1.07/1.29 tot: 25 5 (16.7% true)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Model 10 [ 15 0 305 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.07/1.29
% 1.07/1.29 Process 30618 finished Thu Jun 2 02:59:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------