TSTP Solution File: NUN088+3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NUN088+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 21 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 2 sgn; 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
! [X41,X42] :
( ! [X43] :
( ~ r1(X43)
| X43 != X42 )
| ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uhxXQIAyed/E---3.1_10051.p',axiom_7a) ).
fof(zerouneqone2,conjecture,
! [X44] :
( ! [X39] :
( X44 != X39
| ~ r2(X44,X39) )
| ~ r1(X44) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uhxXQIAyed/E---3.1_10051.p',zerouneqone2) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X41,X42] :
( ! [X43] :
( ~ r1(X43)
| X43 != X42 )
| ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X44] :
( ! [X39] :
( X44 != X39
| ~ r2(X44,X39) )
| ~ r1(X44) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerouneqone2])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X85,X86,X87] :
( ~ r1(X87)
| X87 != X86
| ~ r2(X85,X86) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( esk21_0 = esk22_0
& r2(esk21_0,esk22_0)
& r1(esk21_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ r1(X1)
| X1 != X2
| ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
r2(esk21_0,esk22_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk21_0 = esk22_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
r2(esk21_0,esk21_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk21_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : NUN088+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:19:56 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uhxXQIAyed/E---3.1_10051.p
% 0.18/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10186 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10191 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses : 42
% 0.18/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.18/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 30
% 0.18/0.48 # Processed clauses : 41
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.18/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.18/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.18/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 35
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 34
% 0.18/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12
% 0.18/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.18/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.18/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1233
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1844 pages
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.18/0.48 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.18/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.18/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------