TSTP Solution File: NUN088+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUN088+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n186.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.5MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 27 14:27:10 EST 2019
% Result : Theorem 0.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 61 ( 32 ~; 20 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 1 sgn 21 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(10,axiom,
! [X26,X27] :
( ! [X28] :
( ~ id(X28,X27)
| ~ r1(X28) )
| ~ r2(X26,X27) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpEGsPjF/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',axiom_7a) ).
fof(11,conjecture,
! [X10] :
( ! [X29] :
( ~ id(X29,X10)
| ~ r1(X29) )
| ! [X30] :
( ~ r1(X30)
| ~ r2(X30,X10) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpEGsPjF/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',zerounidone) ).
fof(12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X10] :
( ! [X29] :
( ~ id(X29,X10)
| ~ r1(X29) )
| ! [X30] :
( ~ r1(X30)
| ~ r2(X30,X10) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[11]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X26,X27] :
( ! [X28] :
( ~ id(X28,X27)
| ~ r1(X28) )
| ~ r2(X26,X27) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[10,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(21,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X10] :
( ! [X29] :
( ~ id(X29,X10)
| ~ r1(X29) )
| ! [X30] :
( ~ r1(X30)
| ~ r2(X30,X10) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[12,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(64,plain,
! [X29,X30] :
( ! [X31] :
( ~ id(X31,X30)
| ~ r1(X31) )
| ~ r2(X29,X30) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(65,plain,
! [X29,X30,X31] :
( ~ id(X31,X30)
| ~ r1(X31)
| ~ r2(X29,X30) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(66,plain,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X3)
| ~ id(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
fof(67,negated_conjecture,
? [X10] :
( ? [X29] :
( id(X29,X10)
& r1(X29) )
& ? [X30] :
( r1(X30)
& r2(X30,X10) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
fof(68,negated_conjecture,
? [X31] :
( ? [X32] :
( id(X32,X31)
& r1(X32) )
& ? [X33] :
( r1(X33)
& r2(X33,X31) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[67]) ).
fof(69,negated_conjecture,
( id(esk7_0,esk6_0)
& r1(esk7_0)
& r1(esk8_0)
& r2(esk8_0,esk6_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[68]) ).
cnf(70,negated_conjecture,
r2(esk8_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
cnf(72,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk7_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
cnf(73,negated_conjecture,
id(esk7_0,esk6_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
cnf(91,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X1)
| ~ id(X1,esk6_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,70,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(120,negated_conjecture,
~ id(esk7_0,esk6_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[91,72,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(124,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[120,73,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(125,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[124,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(126,negated_conjecture,
$false,
125,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : NUN088+1 : TPTP v7.3.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n186.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.5MB
% 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Sun Feb 24 02:13:45 CST 2019
% 0.03/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.29 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.29 --creating new selector for [NUM009+0.ax]
% 0.08/0.38 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpEGsPjF/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.08/0.38 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpEGsPjF/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.08/0.38 -prover status Theorem
% 0.08/0.38 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.08/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.38 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.38 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.08/0.38 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.38 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------