TSTP Solution File: NUN088+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:24:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.30s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ id(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ki9k_ls/input.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk23_0,esk21_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ki9k_ls/input.p',i_0_59) ).

cnf(i_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk22_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ki9k_ls/input.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(i_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    id(esk22_0,esk21_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5ki9k_ls/input.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ id(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk23_0,esk21_0),
    i_0_59 ).

cnf(c_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ id(X1,esk21_0)
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk22_0),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    id(esk22_0,esk21_0),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_71])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 03:31:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.30/2.46  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.30/2.46  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.30/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 7.30/2.46  
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof found!
% 7.30/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.30/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 7.30/2.46  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 7.30/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.30/2.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 7.30/2.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Initial clauses                      : 46
% 7.30/2.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
% 7.30/2.46  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 7.30/2.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 7.30/2.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Generated clauses                    : 127
% 7.30/2.46  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 113
% 7.30/2.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Paramodulations                      : 127
% 7.30/2.46  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 7.30/2.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 7.30/2.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.30/2.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 7.30/2.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 7.30/2.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 105
% 7.30/2.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 279
% 7.30/2.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 180
% 7.30/2.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 7.30/2.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 7.30/2.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 7.30/2.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.30/2.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1971
% 7.30/2.46  
% 7.30/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.30/2.46  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 7.30/2.46  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.30/2.46  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 7.30/2.46  # ...preprocessing         : 0.013 s
% 7.30/2.46  # ...main loop             : 0.002 s
% 7.30/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.30/2.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------