TSTP Solution File: NUN088+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 23 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn; 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
! [X65,X66] :
( ! [X67] :
( ~ id(X67,X66)
| ~ r1(X67) )
| ~ r2(X65,X66) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n4vOyftNAc/E---3.1_27368.p',axiom_7a) ).
fof(zerounidone,conjecture,
! [X63] :
( ! [X46] :
( ~ id(X46,X63)
| ~ r1(X46) )
| ! [X47] :
( ~ r1(X47)
| ~ r2(X47,X63) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n4vOyftNAc/E---3.1_27368.p',zerounidone) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X65,X66] :
( ! [X67] :
( ~ id(X67,X66)
| ~ r1(X67) )
| ~ r2(X65,X66) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X63] :
( ! [X46] :
( ~ id(X46,X63)
| ~ r1(X46) )
| ! [X47] :
( ~ r1(X47)
| ~ r2(X47,X63) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerounidone])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X86,X87,X88] :
( ~ id(X88,X87)
| ~ r1(X88)
| ~ r2(X86,X87) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( id(esk2_0,esk1_0)
& r1(esk2_0)
& r1(esk3_0)
& r2(esk3_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ id(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X1)
| ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
r2(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X1)
| ~ id(X1,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
r1(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
id(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 20:42:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.n4vOyftNAc/E---3.1_27368.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 27495 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27502 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 62
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 64
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 64
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 34
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 76
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 46
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2617
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------