TSTP Solution File: NUN088+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.16s 2.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   34
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (   8 unt;  28 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   52 (  28   ~;  20   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   40 (  24   >;  16   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   23 (  23 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  24   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ r4 > r3 > r2 > id > r1 > #nlpp > #skF_11 > #skF_16 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_18 > #skF_19 > #skF_3 > #skF_15 > #skF_12 > #skF_10 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_21 > #skF_13 > #skF_17 > #skF_22 > #skF_14 > #skF_23 > #skF_7 > #skF_9 > #skF_5 > #skF_4 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r2,type,
    r2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r3,type,
    r3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(id,type,
    id: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(r4,type,
    r4: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r1,type,
    r1: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_279,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Y1] :
        ( ! [Y2] :
            ( ~ id(Y2,Y1)
            | ~ r1(Y2) )
        | ! [Y3] :
            ( ~ r1(Y3)
            | ~ r2(Y3,Y1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zerounidone) ).

tff(f_127,axiom,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ~ id(X26,X27)
      | ( ~ r1(X26)
        & ~ r1(X27) )
      | ( r1(X26)
        & r1(X27) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_8) ).

tff(f_101,axiom,
    ! [X20] : id(X20,X20),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_5) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ? [Y24] :
    ! [X19] :
      ( ( id(X19,Y24)
        & r1(X19) )
      | ( ~ r1(X19)
        & ~ id(X19,Y24) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

tff(f_106,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( ~ id(X21,X22)
      | id(X22,X21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_6) ).

tff(f_262,axiom,
    ! [X7,Y10] :
      ( ! [Y20] :
          ( ~ id(Y20,Y10)
          | ~ r1(Y20) )
      | ~ r2(X7,Y10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_7a) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    r1('#skF_22'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_279]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    id('#skF_22','#skF_21'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_279]) ).

tff(c_235,plain,
    ! [X26_147,X27_148] :
      ( ~ r1(X26_147)
      | r1(X27_148)
      | ~ id(X26_147,X27_148) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_127]) ).

tff(c_274,plain,
    ( ~ r1('#skF_22')
    | r1('#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_235]) ).

tff(c_296,plain,
    r1('#skF_21'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_122,c_274]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [X20_23] : id(X20_23,X20_23),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_101]) ).

tff(c_133,plain,
    ! [X19_119] :
      ( r1(X19_119)
      | ~ id(X19_119,'#skF_1') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_147,plain,
    r1('#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_133]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [X19_2] :
      ( id(X19_2,'#skF_1')
      | ~ r1(X19_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_153,plain,
    ! [X22_128,X21_129] :
      ( id(X22_128,X21_129)
      | ~ id(X21_129,X22_128) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_106]) ).

tff(c_164,plain,
    ! [X19_2] :
      ( id('#skF_1',X19_2)
      | ~ r1(X19_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_153]) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    r2('#skF_23','#skF_21'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_279]) ).

tff(c_464,plain,
    ! [X7_169,Y10_170,Y20_171] :
      ( ~ r2(X7_169,Y10_170)
      | ~ r1(Y20_171)
      | ~ id(Y20_171,Y10_170) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_262]) ).

tff(c_483,plain,
    ! [Y20_172] :
      ( ~ r1(Y20_172)
      | ~ id(Y20_172,'#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_464]) ).

tff(c_495,plain,
    ( ~ r1('#skF_1')
    | ~ r1('#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_483]) ).

tff(c_512,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_296,c_147,c_495]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUN088+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:33:33 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.16/2.10  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.16/2.10  
% 4.16/2.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.16/2.13  
% 4.16/2.13  Inference rules
% 4.16/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.16/2.13  #Ref     : 0
% 4.16/2.13  #Sup     : 81
% 4.16/2.13  #Fact    : 0
% 4.16/2.13  #Define  : 0
% 4.16/2.13  #Split   : 1
% 4.16/2.13  #Chain   : 0
% 4.16/2.13  #Close   : 0
% 4.16/2.13  
% 4.16/2.13  Ordering : KBO
% 4.16/2.13  
% 4.16/2.13  Simplification rules
% 4.16/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.16/2.13  #Subsume      : 6
% 4.16/2.13  #Demod        : 25
% 4.16/2.13  #Tautology    : 40
% 4.16/2.13  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.16/2.13  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.16/2.13  
% 4.16/2.13  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.16/2.13  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.16/2.13  
% 4.16/2.13  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.16/2.13  ----------------------
% 4.16/2.13  Preprocessing        : 0.54
% 4.16/2.13  Parsing              : 0.29
% 4.16/2.13  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 4.16/2.13  Main loop            : 0.40
% 4.16/2.13  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 4.16/2.13  Reduction            : 0.11
% 4.16/2.13  Demodulation         : 0.08
% 4.16/2.13  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.16/2.13  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 4.16/2.13  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 4.16/2.13  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.16/2.13  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.16/2.13  Total                : 0.99
% 4.16/2.13  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.16/2.13  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.16/2.13  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.16/2.13  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------