TSTP Solution File: NUN087+2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:36:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  23   ~;  14   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (  29   !;  24   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f80,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f64,f64,f72,f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ r1(X1)
      | ~ r4(X2,X2,X1)
      | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 != X1
      | ~ r1(X1)
      | ~ r4(X2,X2,X0)
      | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( X0 != X1
          | ~ r1(X1) )
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ r4(X2,X2,X0)
          | ~ r1(X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( ? [X1] :
            ( X0 = X1
            & r1(X1) )
        & ? [X2] :
            ( r4(X2,X2,X0)
            & r1(X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X38] :
        ( ? [X22] :
            ( X22 = X38
            & r1(X22) )
        & ? [X21] :
            ( r4(X21,X21,X38)
            & r1(X21) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ? [X38] :
      ( ? [X22] :
          ( X22 = X38
          & r1(X22) )
      & ? [X21] :
          ( r4(X21,X21,X38)
          & r1(X21) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BCbwESXJBa/Vampire---4.8_22608',zerotimeszeroeqzero) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK3,sK3),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f70,f68]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0] : sK3 = sK6(X0),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f48,f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sK3 = X1
      | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( sK3 = X1
        & r1(X1) )
      | ( sK3 != X1
        & ~ r1(X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3])],[f1,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ( X0 = X1
          & r1(X1) )
        | ( X0 != X1
          & ~ r1(X1) ) )
   => ! [X1] :
        ( ( sK3 = X1
          & r1(X1) )
        | ( sK3 != X1
          & ~ r1(X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( X0 = X1
        & r1(X1) )
      | ( X0 != X1
        & ~ r1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BCbwESXJBa/Vampire---4.8_22608',axiom_1) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0] : r1(sK6(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK4(X0) = sK5(X0)
      & r1(sK5(X0))
      & r4(X0,sK6(X0),sK4(X0))
      & r1(sK6(X0)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f17,f29,f28,f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( X1 = X2
              & r1(X2) )
          & ? [X3] :
              ( r4(X0,X3,X1)
              & r1(X3) ) )
     => ( ? [X2] :
            ( sK4(X0) = X2
            & r1(X2) )
        & ? [X3] :
            ( r4(X0,X3,sK4(X0))
            & r1(X3) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( sK4(X0) = X2
          & r1(X2) )
     => ( sK4(X0) = sK5(X0)
        & r1(sK5(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( r4(X0,X3,sK4(X0))
          & r1(X3) )
     => ( r4(X0,sK6(X0),sK4(X0))
        & r1(sK6(X0)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( X1 = X2
          & r1(X2) )
      & ? [X3] :
          ( r4(X0,X3,X1)
          & r1(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X32] :
    ? [X33] :
      ( ? [X35] :
          ( X33 = X35
          & r1(X35) )
      & ? [X34] :
          ( r4(X32,X34,X33)
          & r1(X34) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BCbwESXJBa/Vampire---4.8_22608',axiom_5a) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK6(X0),sK3),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f60,f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0] : sK3 = sK5(X0),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f50,f46]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X0] : r1(sK5(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK6(X0),sK5(X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f49,f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0] : sK4(X0) = sK5(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK6(X0),sK4(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    r1(sK3),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( r1(X1)
      | sK3 != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 17:44:41 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.BCbwESXJBa/Vampire---4.8_22608
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22988)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Memory used [KB]: 1042
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22988)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22983)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22982)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22985)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Memory used [KB]: 1043
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22985)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)First to succeed.
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22986)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Memory used [KB]: 1053
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22986)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22981)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Memory used [KB]: 1056
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22981)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22983)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.54/0.75  % (22989)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22987)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Memory used [KB]: 1040
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22987)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Memory used [KB]: 1054
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22984)------------------------------
% 0.54/0.75  % (22877)Success in time 0.381 s
% 0.54/0.75  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------