TSTP Solution File: NUN087+2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:08:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 49 ( 20 ~; 12 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 22 !; 16 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f98,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f97,f66]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
r1(sK16),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
! [X1] :
( r1(X1)
| sK16 != X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
? [X0] :
! [X1] :
( ( ~ r1(X1)
& X0 != X1 )
| ( r1(X1)
& X0 = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).
fof(f97,plain,
~ r1(sK16),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
( ~ r1(sK16)
| ~ r1(sK16) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f61,f82]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0] : r4(X0,sK16,sK16),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f81,f70]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
! [X1] : sK16 = sK1(X1),
inference(resolution,[],[f52,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X0] : r1(sK1(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0] :
? [X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( X1 = X3
& r1(X3) )
& ? [X2] :
( r4(X0,X2,X1)
& r1(X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X32] :
? [X33] :
( ? [X34] :
( r1(X34)
& r4(X32,X34,X33) )
& ? [X35] :
( X33 = X35
& r1(X35) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5a) ).
fof(f52,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X1)
| sK16 = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0] : r4(X0,sK1(X0),sK16),
inference(superposition,[],[f29,f69]) ).
fof(f69,plain,
! [X0] : sK0(X0) = sK16,
inference(resolution,[],[f52,f58]) ).
fof(f58,plain,
! [X0] : r1(sK0(X0)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f26,f27]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0] : sK2(X0) = sK0(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0] : r1(sK2(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0] : r4(X0,sK1(X0),sK0(X0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X2,X1] :
( ~ r4(X2,X2,X1)
| ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ r4(X2,X2,X0)
| ~ r1(X2)
| X0 != X1
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ~ r1(X1)
| X0 != X1 )
| ! [X2] :
( ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r4(X2,X2,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( ? [X2] :
( r1(X2)
& r4(X2,X2,X0) )
& ? [X1] :
( X0 = X1
& r1(X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X38] :
( ? [X22] :
( X22 = X38
& r1(X22) )
& ? [X21] :
( r1(X21)
& r4(X21,X21,X38) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f12,conjecture,
? [X38] :
( ? [X22] :
( X22 = X38
& r1(X22) )
& ? [X21] :
( r1(X21)
& r4(X21,X21,X38) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zerotimeszeroeqzero) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 10:01:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (21732)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (21732)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.50 % (21753)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (21729)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (21758)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21736)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21731)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21753)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.51 % (21757)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (21732)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (21727)Success in time 0.171 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------