TSTP Solution File: NUN087+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:09:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  22   ~;  16   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   6 sgn;   8   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8n1Nf3kh7L/E---3.1_7009.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
    ! [X33] :
    ? [X34] :
      ( ? [X35] :
          ( r1(X35)
          & r4(X33,X35,X34) )
      & ? [X36] :
          ( r1(X36)
          & X34 = X36 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8n1Nf3kh7L/E---3.1_7009.p',axiom_5a) ).

fof(zerotimeszeroeqzero,conjecture,
    ? [X39] :
      ( ? [X22] :
          ( r1(X22)
          & r4(X22,X22,X39) )
      & ? [X23] :
          ( r1(X23)
          & X39 = X23 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8n1Nf3kh7L/E---3.1_7009.p',zerotimeszeroeqzero) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X76] :
      ( r1(esk16_1(X76))
      & r4(X76,esk16_1(X76),esk15_1(X76))
      & r1(esk17_1(X76))
      & esk15_1(X76) = esk17_1(X76) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X39] :
        ( ? [X22] :
            ( r1(X22)
            & r4(X22,X22,X39) )
        & ? [X23] :
            ( r1(X23)
            & X39 = X23 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerotimeszeroeqzero]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X45] :
      ( ( r1(X45)
        | ~ r1(X45) )
      & ( X45 = esk1_0
        | ~ r1(X45) )
      & ( r1(X45)
        | X45 != esk1_0 )
      & ( X45 = esk1_0
        | X45 != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    r1(esk17_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    esk15_1(X1) = esk17_1(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X87,X88,X89] :
      ( ~ r1(X88)
      | ~ r4(X88,X88,X87)
      | ~ r1(X89)
      | X87 != X89 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    r1(esk16_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    r1(esk15_1(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | ~ r4(X1,X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X3)
    | X2 != X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    esk16_1(X1) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    esk15_1(X1) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r4(X1,X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    r4(X1,esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    r1(esk1_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 20:42:14 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8n1Nf3kh7L/E---3.1_7009.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 7088 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 7092 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 67
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 65
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 16
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 15
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 39
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 18
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1486
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------