TSTP Solution File: NUN087+2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:45:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 27
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 10 unt; 24 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 57 ( 22 ~; 16 |; 19 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 38 ( 23 >; 15 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 6 sgn; 8 !; 11 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
r1: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
r2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
r3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
r4: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk2_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk3_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk4_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk5_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
esk6_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
esk7_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
esk8_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
esk9_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
esk10_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
esk11_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
esk12_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
esk13_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
esk14_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
esk15_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_41,type,
esk16_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_42,type,
esk17_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_43,type,
esk18_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_44,type,
esk19_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_45,type,
esk20_1: $i > $i ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( ( ~ r1(X2)
& X2 != X1 )
| ( r1(X2)
& X2 = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).
fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
! [X33] :
? [X34] :
( ? [X35] :
( r1(X35)
& r4(X33,X35,X34) )
& ? [X36] :
( r1(X36)
& X34 = X36 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).
fof(zerotimeszeroeqzero,conjecture,
? [X39] :
( ? [X22] :
( r1(X22)
& r4(X22,X22,X39) )
& ? [X23] :
( r1(X23)
& X39 = X23 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zerotimeszeroeqzero) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
? [X1] :
! [X2] :
( ( ~ r1(X2)
& X2 != X1 )
| ( r1(X2)
& X2 = X1 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X76] :
( r1(esk16_1(X76))
& r4(X76,esk16_1(X76),esk15_1(X76))
& r1(esk17_1(X76))
& esk15_1(X76) = esk17_1(X76) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X39] :
( ? [X22] :
( r1(X22)
& r4(X22,X22,X39) )
& ? [X23] :
( r1(X23)
& X39 = X23 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerotimeszeroeqzero]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X45] :
( ( r1(X45)
| ~ r1(X45) )
& ( X45 = esk1_0
| ~ r1(X45) )
& ( r1(X45)
| X45 != esk1_0 )
& ( X45 = esk1_0
| X45 != esk1_0 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
r1(esk17_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
esk15_1(X1) = esk17_1(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X87,X88,X89] :
( ~ r1(X88)
| ~ r4(X88,X88,X87)
| ~ r1(X89)
| X87 != X89 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = esk1_0
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
r1(esk16_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
r1(esk15_1(X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X1)
| ~ r4(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X3)
| X2 != X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
esk16_1(X1) = esk1_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
esk15_1(X1) = esk1_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( r1(X1)
| X1 != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r4(X1,X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X2)
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
r4(X1,esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
r1(esk1_0),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 09:26:59 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.58 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time : 0.009000 s
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------