TSTP Solution File: NUN081+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUN081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.55s 2.75s
% Output : Refutation 2.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUN081+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 03:48:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Thu Jun 2 03:48:10 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21292.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.20/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 45 back subsumes 36.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.48/0.67 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.48/0.67 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.48/0.67 number of clauses in intial UL: 43
% 0.48/0.67 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.48/0.67 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.48/0.67 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 36
% 0.48/0.67 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.48/0.67 absolute distinct symbol count: 25
% 0.48/0.67 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.48/0.67 distinct function count: 19
% 0.48/0.67 distinct constant count: 1
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.48/0.67
% 0.48/0.67 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.55/2.75 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.55/2.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 2 [ 1 1 431 ] (0.00 seconds, 895 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 3 [ 1 1 492 ] (0.00 seconds, 1053 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 4 [ 1 1 256 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 5 [ 1 1 2728 ] (0.00 seconds, 3538 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 6 [ 2 1 1267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 7 [ 26 0 2593 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 8 [ 32 1 417 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 9 [ 34 1 1296 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 10 [ 49 1 389 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 11 [ 44 1 309 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 12 [ 52 1 565 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 13 [ 38 1 1835 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 14 [ 44 1 1033 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 15 [ 59 1 1168 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 16 [ 40 1 1630 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 17 [ 70 1 2225 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 18 [ 52 1 296 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 19 [ 46 0 1021 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 20 [ 71 1 258 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 2.37 sec ----> 1982 [hyper,58,21,79,90,90,478,90] {-} $F.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.55/2.75 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.55/2.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 4 [] {+} r2(A,B)| -id(B,$f1(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 10 [] {+} -id(A,B)|id(A,C)| -id(B,C).
% 2.55/2.75 12 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -r1(B)|r1(A).
% 2.55/2.75 13 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -id(C,D)| -r2(A,C)|r2(B,D).
% 2.55/2.75 21 [] {+} -r3(A,B,C)| -id(C,D)| -r2(E,D)| -r2(F,E)| -r1(G)| -r2(G,F).
% 2.55/2.75 45 [] {-} id(A,A).
% 2.55/2.75 56 [] {-} id($f13(A),A).
% 2.55/2.75 58 [] {+} r3(A,$f12(A),$f13(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 61 [] {+} id($f16(A),$f15(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 62 [] {+} r1($f15(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 69 [hyper,45,4] {-} r2(A,$f1(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 79 [hyper,56,10,56] {-} id($f13($f13(A)),A).
% 2.55/2.75 90 [hyper,69,13,56,45] {-} r2(A,$f1($f13(A))).
% 2.55/2.75 478 [hyper,61,12,62] {+} r1($f16(A)).
% 2.55/2.75 1982 [hyper,58,21,79,90,90,478,90] {-} $F.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.55/2.75 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 ============ end of search ============
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 true clauses given 5 (14.3%)
% 2.55/2.75 false clauses given 30
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 FALSE TRUE
% 2.55/2.75 4 0 5
% 2.55/2.75 5 3 19
% 2.55/2.75 6 55 12
% 2.55/2.75 7 95 9
% 2.55/2.75 8 139 77
% 2.55/2.75 9 152 145
% 2.55/2.75 10 136 161
% 2.55/2.75 11 156 122
% 2.55/2.75 12 121 87
% 2.55/2.75 13 70 82
% 2.55/2.75 14 50 33
% 2.55/2.75 15 16 14
% 2.55/2.75 16 16 15
% 2.55/2.75 17 0 8
% 2.55/2.75 18 0 4
% 2.55/2.75 tot: 1009 793 (44.0% true)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Model 20 [ 71 1 258 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.55/2.75
% 2.55/2.75 Process 21292 finished Thu Jun 2 03:48:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------