TSTP Solution File: NUN076+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:26:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  44   ~;  34   |;  32   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (  15 sgn  18   !;  23   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
    ! [X33] :
    ? [X34] :
      ( ? [X35] :
          ( r1(X35)
          & r4(X33,X35,X34) )
      & ? [X36] :
          ( r1(X36)
          & X34 = X36 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

fof(thereexistsanevennumber,conjecture,
    ? [X39,X22,X23] :
      ( ? [X16] :
          ( X16 = X39
          & ? [X25] :
              ( r4(X25,X22,X16)
              & ? [X19] :
                  ( r2(X19,X25)
                  & ? [X34] :
                      ( r1(X34)
                      & r2(X34,X19) ) ) ) )
      & ? [X17] :
          ( r3(X22,X23,X17)
          & X17 = X39 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thereexistsanevennumber) ).

fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X30] :
    ? [X31] :
      ( ? [X32] :
          ( r1(X32)
          & r3(X30,X32,X31) )
      & X31 = X30 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X37] :
      ( r1(esk19_1(X37))
      & r4(X37,esk19_1(X37),esk18_1(X37))
      & r1(esk20_1(X37))
      & esk18_1(X37) = esk20_1(X37) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X39,X22,X23] :
        ( ? [X16] :
            ( X16 = X39
            & ? [X25] :
                ( r4(X25,X22,X16)
                & ? [X19] :
                    ( r2(X19,X25)
                    & ? [X34] :
                        ( r1(X34)
                        & r2(X34,X19) ) ) ) )
        & ? [X17] :
            ( r3(X22,X23,X17)
            & X17 = X39 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thereexistsanevennumber]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( r1(X4)
        | ~ r1(X4) )
      & ( X4 = esk16_0
        | ~ r1(X4) )
      & ( r1(X4)
        | X4 != esk16_0 )
      & ( X4 = esk16_0
        | X4 != esk16_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    r1(esk20_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    esk18_1(X1) = esk20_1(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X40,X41,X43,X44,X45,X46,X42,X47] :
      ( X43 != X40
      | ~ r4(X44,X41,X43)
      | ~ r2(X45,X44)
      | ~ r1(X46)
      | ~ r2(X46,X45)
      | ~ r3(X41,X42,X47)
      | X47 != X40 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = esk16_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    r1(esk18_1(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    r1(esk19_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X33] :
      ( r1(esk11_1(X33))
      & r3(X33,esk11_1(X33),esk10_1(X33))
      & esk10_1(X33) = X33 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ r3(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ r2(X5,X6)
    | ~ r1(X5)
    | ~ r2(X6,X7)
    | ~ r4(X7,X3,X8)
    | X8 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    r4(X1,esk19_1(X1),esk18_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    esk18_1(X1) = esk16_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    esk19_1(X1) = esk16_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    r3(X1,esk11_1(X1),esk10_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    esk10_1(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    r1(esk11_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r4(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X4,X3)
    | ~ r2(X5,X1)
    | ~ r2(X6,X5)
    | ~ r1(X6) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    r4(X1,esk16_0,esk16_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    r3(X1,esk11_1(X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    esk11_1(X1) = esk16_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X6,X8] :
      ( ( r2(X6,X8)
        | ~ r2(X6,X8) )
      & ( X8 = esk12_1(X6)
        | ~ r2(X6,X8) )
      & ( r2(X6,X8)
        | X8 != esk12_1(X6) )
      & ( X8 = esk12_1(X6)
        | X8 != esk12_1(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r3(esk16_0,X1,esk16_0)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X4,X2)
    | ~ r1(X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    r3(X1,esk16_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( r2(X2,X1)
    | X1 != esk12_1(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X3,X1)
    | ~ r1(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    r2(X1,esk12_1(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    r1(esk16_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.07  % Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.04/0.08  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 10:44:15 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/1.31  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.12/1.31  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.12/1.31  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 0.12/1.31  
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof found!
% 0.12/1.31  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/1.31  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object total steps             : 36
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 0.12/1.31  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.12/1.31  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.12/1.31  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.12/1.31  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.12/1.31  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.12/1.31  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.12/1.31  # Processed clauses                    : 94
% 0.12/1.31  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.12/1.31  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.12/1.31  # ...remaining for further processing  : 83
% 0.12/1.31  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.12/1.31  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.12/1.31  # Backward-rewritten                   : 24
% 0.12/1.31  # Generated clauses                    : 143
% 0.12/1.31  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 130
% 0.12/1.31  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.12/1.31  # Paramodulations                      : 128
% 0.12/1.31  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Equation resolutions                 : 11
% 0.12/1.31  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 0.12/1.31  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.12/1.31  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/1.31  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.12/1.31  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
% 0.12/1.31  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.12/1.31  # ...number of literals in the above   : 48
% 0.12/1.31  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Current number of archived clauses   : 37
% 0.12/1.31  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 236
% 0.12/1.31  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 0.12/1.31  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.12/1.31  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.12/1.31  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 34
% 0.12/1.31  # BW rewrite match successes           : 19
% 0.12/1.31  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/1.31  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2678
% 0.12/1.31  
% 0.12/1.31  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/1.31  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.12/1.31  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.12/1.31  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.12/1.31  # Maximum resident set size: 2996 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------